Quantcast
Channel: Huffington Post India
Viewing all 46147 articles
Browse latest View live

Everything You Need To Know About Deepika Padukone And Ranveer Singh's Upcoming Wedding

$
0
0

After dating for nearly 5 years, Ranveer Singh and Deepika Padukone, who've appeared in 4 films together, are ready to tie the knot.

According to a report in Filmfare, the wedding is going to be a hyper-exclusive private event which will take place on November 20 in Italy. The guest list has been restricted to not more than 30 people that include family and close friends.

Lake Como in Northern Italy's Lombardy's region has been finalised as the venue for the wedding. The picturesque lake town in Europe has become a favorite hotspot among the rich and the famous and has been featured in films such as Ocean's Twelve and Casino Royale.

Reportedly, Ranveer and Deepika are going all out to ensure the celebration remains private. In the recent past, pictures of celebrity weddings have ended up on Instagram during the celebrations itself. To ensure that doesn't happen, the couple will be requesting guests to leave their phones behind.

DNA quoted a source as saying, "They have asked guests to not bring their cell phones to the ceremony. Considering the fact that it will be a destination wedding, there will be fewer people and all the arrangements will be in place."

After the wedding in Italy, the couple plans to throw a reception party in Mumbai for their friends from the industry.

Also see on HuffPost:


Trump Administration Blows Smoke On Climate Change Effect On Wildfires

$
0
0
Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke talks to journalists outside the White House West Wing before attending a Cabinet meeting with President Donald Trump on Thursday. Zinke said the wildfires in the West are caused by mismanaged public lands and

Just when it seemed that the Trump administration had rolled out every nonsensical thing that could be said and done in response to the extreme wildfires raging in California, Thursday happened.

It was a dizzying display of misinformation and climate change denialism ― of what happens when ideology trumps science.

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke was up early for a chat with his good friends at Fox Business. Most of the 6-minute interview was what one might have come to expect after the last week: Zinke blasted “radical” environmental groups and called for better forest management. But halfway through the segment, host Neil Cavuto posed a question.

“Do you believe climate change is real and that man is the cause?” he asked.

“There’s no dispute that the climate is changing, although it has always changed,” Zinke said. “Whether man is the direct result, how much that result is, that’s still being disputed.” In the case of fires, Zinke added, “it’s clear” that “temperatures are higher, the season’s longer.”  

To be clear, the vast majority of climate scientistsroughly 97 percent — agree that climate change is real and that human activity is the primary cause. Scientific research has also shown that climate change is contributing to the extreme fires raging across the West.

Whether or not climate change is helping drive extreme wildfire, Zinke told Cavuto, is “irrelevant to what’s occurred.” To emphasize his point, Zinke noted the more than 120 million dead trees in California. What he didn’t mention, of course, is that the trees died because of a years-long drought that scientists have concluded was made worse by anthropogenic climate change.

A few hours after his interview with Fox, CBS News correspondent Weijia Jiang asked Zinke outside the White House if climate change is a factor in the California fires. “Of course,” he said, a response that stood in stark contrast to comments he made during his weekend trip to fire-scorched California.

“I’ve heard the climate change argument back and forth. This has nothing to do with climate change,” he told KCRA-TV in Sacramento over the weekend. “This has to do with active forest management.”

A Thursday headline from Bloomberg read “Zinke Blames Climate Change, Lax Forest Management for Wildfires.” But acknowledging that climate change might be playing a role in devastating wildfires is not the same as accepting that human activity ― the burning of fossil fuels ― is driving global climate change. And Zinke’s newfound belief that climate change is part of the wildfire problem came only after several days of intense criticism.

Also on Thursday, the U.S. Forest Service unveiled a new policy to partner with states in an effort to combat catastrophic wildfires ― a move that was celebrated by both Republican and Democratic lawmakers. At a press conference announcing the new strategy, Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue dodged questions about his personal beliefs about climate change and wildfire.

“A lot of people, when you talk about climate change, they want to talk about what the causes are,” Purdue said. “What we’re trying to talk about is the impact.”

Perdue said the United States has gone through several “cycles of climate change” and is “in a warmer cycle now.” 

“So the fact is, what are we doing about that?” he asked. “And the solutions are the same. If you want to debate the cause, you can do that. We’re about focusing on what we can do today in order to mitigate the impact of longer fire seasons, hotter fires, drier conditions in that way. And that’s what this is really all about.”

In other words, Purdue’s apparent stance ― like Zinke’s ― is that the cause of climate change is up for debate and irrelevant to the discussion. 

By Thursday afternoon, President Donald Trump chimed in. At a Cabinet meeting, the president “complimented Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke for saying the California fires are ‘not a global warming thing,’” reported Daniel Dale, a correspondent for the Toronto Star, reported.  

The administration appears to be using the disaster in California as an opportunity to push partisan policy, as HuffPost previously reported. Trump and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross have attempted to connect devastating California wildfires to a longstanding fight between farmers and environmentalists over water resources. 

California fire officialsdismissedTrump’s claim last week that the fires have been exacerbated by a water shortage resulting from “bad environmental laws.” As Scott McLean, deputy chief of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, told HuffPost: “It is our changing climate that is leading to more severe and destructive fires.”

Nevertheless, Ross issued a directive that prioritizes water for fighting wildland fires over protecting endangered species, without offering a shred of evidence to show that firefighters actually need that additional water.

As if trying to prove that the water order has nothing to do with wildfire, Trump repeated his false claim at Thursday’s Cabinet meeting. 

“We’re spending a fortune in California because of poor maintenance and because, frankly, they’re sending a lot of water out to the Pacific to protect the smelt,” he said, referring to the Delta smelt, an imperiled species of fish. 

“And, by the way, it’s not working.”

Trump has offered no condolences to the victims and no thanks to the firefighters for their efforts this summer. 

Woman Gets Contact Lens Stuck In Eye For 28 Years

$
0
0

A missing contacts lens isn’t something you should turn a blind eye toward.

Case in point: A 42-year-old woman in Great Britain who lost a lens when she was a teen, only to have doctors discover it embedded in her eye 28 years later.

According to the medical journal BMJ Case Reports, the patient went to the doctor after she discovered a pea-sized lump below her left eyebrow.

The cyst was visible on an MRI and cause the woman’s left eyelid to droop, according to CNN.  

When doctors went in to remove the cyst, they discovered a rigid contact lens that somehow migrated into the eyelid, according to USA Today.

At first, the woman couldn’t recall how the contact lens got stuck in her peepers. Then her mom remembered the patient losing a lens during a badminton game when the patient was just 14.

Since the woman had no symptoms, she figured the lens had simply fallen out and gone missing.

“The patient never wore [rigid gas-permeable] lenses following this incident. We can infer that the RGP lens migrated into the patient’s left upper eyelid at the time of trauma and had been in situ for the last 28 years,” the authors said in their report.

Once the cyst and the lens were removed from the woman’s eyes, her peepers went back to normal.

This isn’t the only bizarre eye injury that’s hard to stomach.

In late 2016, a 67-year-old British woman went in for cataracts surgery only to discover the “blueish mass” in one of her eyes was actually 27 contact lenses.

If something similar happens to you and you don’t have nearly three decades to wait for removal, Health.com suggests flipping your upper eyelid to see if it’s hiding underneath, and using saline drops to flush it out.

If that doesn’t work, see your eye doctor.

University Students Say Attack On Umar Khalid Was A Message For Them To Shut Up

$
0
0
Fahad Ahmad protesting at TISS.

NEW DELHI — There is a concerted effort to silence voices critical of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its politics in India, student leaders who have been protesting against right-wing intimidation told HuffPost India. The activists were responding to an attack on former Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) student Umar Khalid earlier this week in New Delhi.

Hours after the incident, a number of people, including some journalists, had questioned on social networks whether the attack had taken place at all. Others went a step further to suggest that the assailant, who had a gun, shouldn't have missed his target. Khalid, who submitted his PhD thesis to JNU earlier this month, is not new to the vitriol. He has been at the receiving end of a stream of abuse on social media for more than two years.

The Delhi Police, who found CCTV footage of the fleeing attacker, have confirmed that the attack was not staged, though they were not sure if Khalid was being targeted. Two men have claimed responsibility for the attack in a video doing the rounds of WhatsApp. HuffPost India couldn't independently establish the veracity of the video.

While the attacker's identity and motive are still unknown, the students who spoke to HuffPost India said that it had only been a matter of time before the combination of political persecution and social media hatred emboldened someone to take an extreme step. They pointed to the murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh last year by people associated with Hindutva organisations as evidence of this.

Across campuses in India, students critical of the ruling party's politics are witnessing a strong pushback from the government, university administrations and state machineries. In 2017, student activist Pooja Shukla was thrown into jail for 26 days for waving a black flag at Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Adityanath when he visited Lucknow University. Shukla later joined the Samajwadi Party as a full-time political activist and has been at the receiving end of intimidation by the police, who have conducted random searches at her house and detained her on more than one occasion.

"The attack on Umar... and the response to it is evidence of the fact that student activists have now become the eyesore of supporters of a certain ideology," 23-year-old Shukla told HuffPost India.

ALSO READ: JAILED FOR WAVING A BLACK FLAG AT ADITYANATH, THIS 23-YEAR-OLD GIRL IS THE FACE OF DISSENT IN UP

Twenty-six-year old Fahad Ahmad has spent the past couple of months running from pillar to post to get admission to a doctoral course which he had qualified for two years ago. Ahmed had enrolled for an integrated MPhil-PhD degree in social work at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) in Mumbai, which allows a student to start on his PhD immediately after he completes his MPhil.

However, the former general secretary of the students' union of TISS faces a hurdle in pursuing his education. He had spearheaded a movement against the TISS administration after it rolled back the waiver of fees for SC, ST and OBC students earlier this year. Beginning this February, Ahmad had led protests that included sit-in demonstrations, blocking of the university gates and surrounding administrative offices. In May this year, he refused to accept his degree certificate at the convocation as a mark of protest.

Fahad Ahmad refusing the degree at TISS.

Soon after the convocation, TISS sent Ahmad a two-page letter, saying he had "insulted" the institution by refusing to accept his certificate. It also said that an enquiry has been instituted against him and other students. The letter, a copy of which is with HuffPost, also informed Ahmad that the university is 'not in a position to forward your documents for the release of JRF'.

"My father is a farmer in Bareilly and my mother a homemaker. I depend on the JRF (Junior Research Fellowship) scholarship from the UGC to support my education," said Ahmed.

However, a UGC policy that withholds a scholarship if there is a disciplinary enquiry against a student means that Ahmed has not received his stipend for four months. Ahmed says that his being a vocal critic of the central government's "anti-Dalit and anti-minority politics" had put him under the government's scanner and that the university administration was trying to curry favour with the government by making an example out of him.

"For the longest time, I did not refer to my being Muslim during political interactions. But right now, this country is at a stage where I cannot be in denial of the fact that my religion is closely related to the persecution I have faced," Ahmed said. He added that the country did not need an attack on Khalid to wake up to the fact that the government's new enemies are students.

Professor PK Shajahan, who was the dean of student when Ahmad was supposed to receive the degree certificate from the chairman S. Ramadorai, who also happens to be an advisor to the Prime Minister, said that the student refused to accept the degree. "He also wanted to speak about his issues on the stage. When he was asked not to, he refused to accept the degree and walked away," Shajahan said.

The letter the university later sent to Ahmad said that he 'in a way, insulted the chairman'.

The students also met education minister Prakash Javadekar, who Ahmad claimed, rejected their pleas about the fees.

"There's barely any opposition and the parties themselves have far from clean images. Protests by students, on the other hand, have proved to be more impactful in consolidating opinions against the BJP. No wonder then that they are cracking down on us," he said.

Ahmad's concerns are echoed by Shivangi Choubey, a 21-year-old student of Banaras Hindu University (BHU) who was recently 'debarred' from the institution for taking part in protests against the administration and the conservative, Hindutva right-wing politics on campus. Chaubey, who is part of a liberal, anti-Hindutva student's group in BHU called Joint Action Committee, told HuffPost India that she was known as a vocal critic of "everything the BJP and any religious, conservative political groups" represent.

"I had participated in a protest last year against a woman who was harassed by men on campus and the administration did not take concrete action against it. Later, I campaigned for the deadline at women's hostels to be extended," Choubey said. During one such protest earlier this year, she and some other students went to confront chief proctor Royana Singh and a heated argument followed. The next day Singh filed an FIR against Choubey under Section 307 of the IPC for "attempt to murder".

"She concocted a host of lies, but couldn't back it up with proof. Her medico-legal certificate only found that she was suffering from hypertension and could not find any evidence of physical assault like she had suggested. So police called us for questioning but did not arrest us as there was no evidence against me," Choubey said.

Singh confirmed the fact that she had filed an FIR alleging 'attempt to murder' but the police gave Choubey a clean chit.

Singh confirmed the fact that she had filed an FIR alleging 'attempt to murder' but the police gave Choubey a clean chit. She added that though Choubey and the students didn't physically assault her, they broke a glass door, shards from which injured Singh. "Their intentions were not right," Singh said.

Singh also rejected claims that Choubey was being targeted for speaking against the political regime at the Centre. "She had been claiming that she has not been given a character certificate, but we did give it to her on 13 August. The university did everything possible to help her get admission to a different institution since she was debarred from BHU.

Choubey countered that claim and said the university was compelled to do so since she had spoken against them widely.

Both Ahmed and Choubey said that they faced threats through various channels—unofficial communications from university officials, police and acquaintances —of being thrown to jail on serious charges.

"It's not just the government. The government's politics emboldens a certain group of people who then take it upon themselves to go to extremes, knowing the government will probably be on their side. That's what happened in JNU, that's what happened to me. They want to shut up political voices within campuses by taking us out and that's what they have managed to do in BHU in my case at least," said Choubey.

Sudhanshu Vajpayee, a former student of Lucknow University, was rusticated in 2015 after he got into a scuffle with Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) activists on the campus. The ABVP activists had tried to disrupt a seminar against love jihad which activist Kavita Krishnan was addressing.

"I challenged the university's decision to rusticate me in court and in 2016, the court put a stay order on their rustication. By then, I had already started a masters' degree course at an open university. Just before I went to apply for an MPhil course in 2017, the university got wind of my intentions and re-appealed against the court order stopping my rustication. So my studies are on hold again," 28-year-old Vajpayee told HuffPost India.

The attack on Khalid, said Vajpayee, sounds like the beginning of another long struggle for students in a country where they have emerged as one of the primary voices of dissent against divisive Hindutva right-wing sentiments.

Kerala Floods: Death Toll Rises To 164

$
0
0
Indian rescuers conduct rescue operations after a landslide at Kuttampuzha village in Ernakulam district in the Indian state of Kerala on August 9, 2018.

The death toll from Kerala's worst floods in a century has risen to 164, Manorama Online reported, citing chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan.

The situation remains extremely critical, said Vijayan, adding that 223,000 people have been shifted to rehabilitation camps.

The India Meteorological Department has issued a red alert in 13 of 14 districts in the state.

The Met department in Trivandrum, however, has predicted that the intensity of the rain will reduce by Sunday.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit Kerala on Friday evening and undertake an aerial survey the next day.

Vijayan tweeted on Friday he has requested for send more "central forces and choppers for rescue work", and that Modi has assured immediate help.

Torrential rains have disrupted normal life, destroyed crops and affected air, rail and road traffic in the state over the past two weeks. Reuters reported the Kochi airport is likely to remain shut till August 26 because of flooding and flights were being diverted to the two other airports of the state.

Mathrubhumi reported that the volume of water being released from Idukki dam may be increased after the water level in the dam neared 2,403 feet.

Visit https://keralarescue.in/ to find out how you can help the state. You can also donate to the Chief Minister's Distress Relief Fund here.

Aretha Franklin Was The Original Pop Diva

$
0
0

“I assume you’ve heard the Aretha story,” said “Divas Live” producer Sean Murphy. He was one of a handful of people I spoke to for the 20th anniversary of the all-star VH1 concert series earlier this year. And yes, I’d heard the Aretha story. It was one for the history books, cementing her position as pop’s OG diva.

In its proper denotation, “diva” means “goddess.” That definition is sometimes lost in the word’s postmodern permutations, where it’s become a shorthand for “bitch.” We all know there are better synonyms: conquerer, artiste, doyenne, Aretha. 

As popular music grew in spectacle throughout the 20th century, the personalities of the women making it got bigger. But none would be here without Aretha Franklin, the soul sister who died Thursday at the age of 76. Franklin made divadom possible, first by showcasing an impossibly fierce voice and later by demonstrating an awareness of just how valuable that voice was. 

Take, for instance, “Divas Live,” which launched in 1998 with Franklin as the centerpiece. Four decades into her career, no female singer was more exalted than Franklin, even though she hadn’t had a Top 10 hit since 1985. Mariah Carey, Céline Dion, Gloria Estefan, Shania Twain and Carole King paid their respects on that April night, competing for a morsel of the star power that Franklin’s pipes summoned.

Gloria Estefan, Mariah Carey, Aretha Franklin, Carole King, Celine Dion and Shania Twain at

But it’s not enough to know that our pop matrons are talented. We want to know they’re in charge, that they have battled the forces of sexism and voyeurism and emerged unscathed. In that, “Divas Live” was Franklin’s ultimate crucible.

The “Aretha story” goes like this. Back in ’98, Franklin’s management had apparently instructed the producers to shut off the concert venue’s air conditioning during her rehearsal. It was bad for the vocal chords, they insisted. But when Franklin stepped onstage to run through her numbers, she demanded silence. Placing her hand near a vent, Franklin discovered a breeze was indeed wafting through the room.

“She threw a hissy fit and walked out of the backstage into a car and left,” producer Wayne Isaak said.

Chaos ensued. Was the AC system actually on ― and, if so, why? According to Murphy, the Beacon Theatre was coincidentally running a test of its ventilation that day, so yes, it was on. According to producer Lauren Zalaznick, however, the AC was so off that “the other performers were horrified” by the saunalike environment. Either way, frenzied phone calls followed, and no one was sure whether Franklin would be back for the telecast. 

Eventually, the staff learned that Franklin had fled to her hotel, where she was cavalierly snacking on powdered donuts during a dress fitting. Was it a sign that Miss Franklin, as everyone called her, would arrive for the live show without a rehearsal? “Divas Live” was a multimillion-dollar broadcast, and what mattered most was everyone showing up for their cues.

“Things were coming down from Mount Sinai,” Zalaznick said. “We didn’t know [if she’d return], and then all of a sudden the clouds parted, the tablets were delivered, and suddenly we knew. To me, it felt that mysterious and insane.”

The show would not only go on; it would become a hallmark of Franklin’s career, generating a massive audience that saw Franklin’s heirs pay tribute to their diva forerunner just two months after the Lauryn Hill collaboration “A Rose Is Still a Rose” rechristened her relevance among younger music fans. During the evening’s grand denouement, the ladies performed Franklin’s signature “(You Make Me Feel Like) A Natural Woman,” written by King, together ― a pageant that’s still better described as Aretha and her five backup singers.

“I think we put the house AC on and froze it as best we could,” Zalaznick added. “And I’m telling you I believe that we cut the AC before Aretha Franklin came out to perform, and maybe again for the finale. Or maybe we said we did but we didn’t.”

Hearing stories like this, Franklin’s sense of authority rings even louder given how little we knew about her personal life. Usually the dignitaries thought to be the fussiest are the ones whose relationships and private behavior headline tabloids. But with Franklin, it was almost always about the music. She positioned herself as culture’s supreme superstar to mask any self-doubt she might have felt as a result of body-image struggles or her two divorces, one of which involved domestic abuse. 

In the 21st century, the less Franklin performed, the more candid she became about the counterparts who succeeded her. When Beyoncé introduced Tina Turner as “the queen” at the 2008 Grammys, Franklin took offense, releasing an unprompted statement in which she dismissed it as a “cheap shot.” In 2014, she praised Adele, Alicia Keys and Whitney Houston but offered “no comment” when asked about Nicki Minaj and left Taylor Swift’s plaudits at “great gowns.” In 2017, she sent The Associated Press a fax to clarify Dionne Warwick’s “libel” ― the claim that Franklin was Houston’s godmother.

For Franklin, everything was about status. No one could speak for her, and no one could challenge her sovereignty. As absurd as the whole “Divas Live” episode might seem, why wouldn’t she storm off when her specifications weren’t met? A handful of singers with tighter faces and broader radio play were waiting in the wings to threaten her throne ― or at least that’s what it must have felt like.

And so, on that holy night, in the ultimate diva move, Franklin did what she best knew how to do, as someone whose pioneering spotlight shined long before MTV and TMZ brought celebrity culture to our fingertips: She sang so loudly, so powerfully and so beautifully that no one could compete.

She commanded respect ― and not just a little bit.

Aretha Franklin in 1975.

Radhika Apte Picks The 5 Shows You Ought To Watch On Netflix This Weekend

$
0
0

With streaming platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Hotstar, Voot competing for our attention, it can be quite overwhelming to browse all of them to pick the perfect show for your weekend bingeing.

So we got Radhika Apte, star of the well-received Sacred Games and who'll soon be seen in another Netflix show, Ghoul, to list down the shows she's bingeing on Netflix, Amazon, and Hotstar.

FARGO (Netflix)

Inspired by the Coen Brothers' movie that went by the same name, Fargo is an Emmy Award-winning crime drama that has spawned 3 seasons. It features an outstanding performance by Allison Tolman, Kirsten Dunst, Jesse Plemons and Jean Smart, all of whom have garnered critical praise for their role in the series.

THE SINNER (Netflix)

Starring Jessica Biel in a role that's earned her several accolades, The Sinner is a psychological thriller about a young woman who has committed a serious felony but has no memory of it. The show focusses on a detective trying to unravel the mind of Cora Tannetti, the alleged murderer, and what motivated her to do so.

Also Read: Vicky Kaushal Picks The 5 Films/Shows To Watch On Netflix, Hotstar, Amazon

Also Read: Richa Chaddha Lists Down Her Current Favorite Shows On Netflix, Amazon, Hotstar

THE JINX

The Jinx is a pathbreaking docu-drama that is based on the life of notorious real-estate mogul Robert Dust, who was a key suspect in a bunch of mysterious murders. The documentary digs into the evidence and throws a light into the complicated investigations.

THE CROWN (Netflix)

Chronicling the life and times of Queen Elizabeth II, TheCrown offers a rare, inside peek into British royalty and the gender politics of the era. Opulently produced and well-acted, The Crown was one of Netflix's most-expensive production and clocked in a bunch of Emmys too for the streaming giant.

BREAKING BAD (Netflix)

This is an all-time classic, a show that became cool before bingeing was even a thing. Featuring a breakout performance by Bryan Craston, the show tells the story of Walter White, a chemistry teacher who is detected with cancer and who turns to a life of crime to secure the financial future of his family.

Also see on HuffPost:

The Kajol Interview: Men In The Industry Are Running Scared In Wake Of The #MeToo Movement

$
0
0

MUMBAI -- Kajol, one of the most celebrated actors in the Hindi film industry, is known for her ability to carry on a crackling conversation that is also thoughtful, engaging and most of all, witty.

At a five-star hotel in Juhu, the actor is in the midst of promoting her next film, Helicopter Eela, which is set to release on 7 September.

Kajol, whose last Hindi film was the Shah Rukh Khan-starrer Dilwale, had been "sure" she would not act again after her first film in 1992, but we all know how that turned out.

"Life is what happens when you are making other plans," she quips, settling on an armchair, munching a caramel cookie.

The suite offers a dramatic view of the Arabian Sea, there's a slight drizzle outside, just enough to add the right amount of background score. As steaming cups of tea arrive, we begin our interview:

You've been a part of several memorable films but one of your strongest performances was in Dushman (a remake of the Hollywood film Eye for an Eye), where you featured in a double role. It is also perhaps the most difficult role you've played and most would agree that the depiction of the rape and murder in the film is gut-wrenching. What do you remember from the shoot?

That I vehemently refused to shoot it. It's not me, it's a body double. They tried to persuade me by saying they'll shoot it aesthetically and all, but I was having none of it. None. The rape and violence disturbed me to another level altogether. There was no way I could do it. I said I don't care how you shoot it, I just cannot get myself to do it. Finally, they shot it with a double. Even now, if the scene pops up on TV, I shut my eyes. I can't even bear to see it.

That's quite interesting. But aren't actors inclined to push themselves into a space they wouldn't ordinarily find themselves in? In that sense, would you say you've protected yourself by not taking up darker/edgier roles?

You have to protect yourself. Your mental health is paramount. Your films will always, always affect you in more ways than you can imagine. It's because you live through that moment when you are enacting it. At that moment, it's real. And for you to ensure it looks real, it has to come from an emotional space. You can't fake it—the camera will catch it. And if you have too many of those moments, it will take a serious emotional toll on you, it will burn you out. I didn't want that.

Kajol in a still from Tanuja Chandra's 'Dushman'

You've always said that you chose acting because of how fun it was—like being on a paid vacation. Over years, as you've grown as a person, has your idea or motivation for being an actor changed to something more... profound?

Having fun is still the most primary incentive for me to act! I really cannot be the person who shoots gut-wrenching scenes for a movie that I don't even feel like watching later on. I want to wake up and want to go to do my job and it can't be that if I am not enjoying it or I am petrified of it. Then, it's also my idea of wanting to do films I'd like to watch. And not those that'd make me hide my face in embarrassment.

Do you think that has to do with your offscreen personality which melts into the kind of roles that you choose?

It has everything to do with it. My personality, the time that I am in my life right now, my priorities, all these factors contribute to my choices. I have a lot going on in my life. I can't allow acting to consume me, some actors do. I am only consumed by the book that I am reading right now, which is this crazy fantasy fiction. Books are the drug of my choice. They are my go-to happy places. Acting, on the other hand, I never looked at as something I needed to build on. Never thought, oh I've done these kinds of films, now let me try those types. I only saw the characters. If they ignited something in me, I'd try and take them from the pages to the screen in a memorable way.

In a career spanning 26 years, you have only done 38 films (for perspective, Rani Mukerji did 54 films in 29 years and Ajay Devgn 108 in around 29 years). Has this meant saying 'no' to a lot of people? And is it easy to do that in Bollywood?

There are many offers but I am very comfortable saying 'no'. I figured it's better to say 'no' at the onset instead of suffering through 100 days of a movie shoot you don't like. I have done it in the past and regretted it. So I say 'no' upfront instead of cooking up excuses like, "Oh, I don't have dates."

Then, I become friends with them (laughs).

Having survived the 90s and still being active in 2018, how do you feel the writing, as far as characters for women are concerned, has changed?

It's changed dramatically, because we, as a society have changed. We have movies such as Wonder Woman. What's the subtext there? That the world is finally beginning to believe that women can save the world. It's a fabulous time for women actors. It's also become financially viable to have women-driven cinema, which is a big factor. Irrespective of the genre, a movie doesn't get made unless it makes economic sense. A lot has to do with people whose sensibilities have changed.

Do you think a film like Helicopter Eela, which is about a single mother who's an aspiring singer, would have found a home in the 90s?

Maybe it wouldn't have been made in the manner it has been made. It's a very contemporary story that talks to today's audience. It's a fun film with a lot of warmth and a great story.

What was the on-set experience like?

I had a lot of fun with Dada (Pradeep Sarkar) and Riddhi (actor Riddhi Sen, who plays her son). There was a great energy on set and more importantly, the crew was open to suggestions. There was an environment where I could go and make suggestions, ask him to tweak something if it wasn't working. This was true for other cast members who brought their own contributions to the set. It helped that more than half of us were Bengali (laughs).

The Ja Simran Ja scene from Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge is perhaps one of the most memorable scenes in movie history. What was going on in your mind when you were filming it?

Honestly, we were worried about the heat and getting cranky, my hair was frizzling out, the train wasn't moving at the right speed that it should have. We couldn't do retakes because the train had to go ahead and come back which would take some 20 minutes. It was a mess. Actually, Raj should have just pulled the chain instead of making me run like a crazy person.

In hindsight, of course, it's become an iconic scene but I can't take any credit for it. It's all Adi (director Aditya Chopra).

Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol in DDLJ.

You've often said that you are an extremely lazy person who'd rather read a book than act. And yet you have been part of some of the most successful films of the past decade. Do you think it has to do with consciously crafting a screen identity that made a lot of young women relate to you?

Honestly, I don't analyse my career. What I do is I critique it. When I watch my films, I am always thinking about how differently I could have done a particular shot. What has worked for me? It's the roles I chose and the people I worked with. I think my choice of roles—and I am very selective about what I do—really made a difference. I never wished myself in someone else's place. I just went with the flow and it worked out.

Would you agree that you were able to make a lot of choices owing to the lineage that you come from (Kajol is the daughter of actor Tanuja and director-producer Shomu Mukherjee) and the privileges you enjoy?

No. The first film I did was out of choice. I remember my father came to me during the film's mahurat and said, "once you put that paint on your face, it's never going to come out." On the sets of my first film, I firmly believed this is going to be the only film that I do in my life. Who knew 26 years later I'd still be acting? So, I don't think anybody is privileged. This industry is pretty unforgiving of failures. If I hadn't succeeded or if I were not good at what I did, I'd have completely tanked.

But the argument is that actors from a film background get to take multiple shots at stardom as opposed to an outsider who'd have to pack their bags after the first film fails...

See, that time was different. All of us were given multiple chances. Shah Rukh Khan got, like, 3 chances. I got several. We all got chances to do well. The audience gave us more chances. But now the industry is pretty unforgiving. Now, it's really cut-throat and if you aren't, like, fabulous in your first film, producers aren't going to throw their money on you. Your hair has to be perfect, you should be able to dance fabulously, the lip colour needs to work, your body has to be superb, your nose has to be perfect! Actors today are under a lot of scrutiny. However, I feel actors also take too much pressure and they bring it upon themselves.

Right now, thanks to Jessica Chastain and Jennifer Lawrence, there's finally a conversation about pay disparity where female actors are demanding equal pay. Has that global movement crystallised into real empowerment on a local level? Do you, today, negotiate better than you would in the past?

I never paid too much attention to that. I am okay with where I am, who I am, and what I am getting paid. Right now my husband is only paying me (Devgn is the producer of Helicopter Eela), so I will probably negotiate once the film releases and does well (laughs).

A cultural audit is underway across film industries in the world where women are finally coming out and talking about exploitative behaviour. What would you say is the reason for the culture of silence engulfing the Hindi film industry as far as the #MeToo movement is concerned?

We have to realise that the movement isn't dedicated to the film industry. It exists in all the industries. The biggest thing we can do as women is turn around and call out that behaviour. The silence, well, it's about societal stigma. It's how we are conditioned into thinking. It's about how it 'doesn't look good' on a woman. We need societal change. Thank God for social media that has empowered people to call out bad behaviour. Men today are running a little more scared. That's definitely a good thing. There should be some fear in place to stop that kind of behaviour. Maybe we won't be able to stop it altogether but perhaps it will help us in reducing it. Fortunately, I didn't have any such experience.

Would you say, once again, that your privilege insulated you from predatory behaviour?

Yes. Because of who my mother is and the family that I come from, it certainly insulated me from problematic behaviour. So I was protected to a certain extent, that's undeniable. Another thing that helped me was perhaps my nature—everybody knew how outspoken I was so nobody could pull that shit on me.

Also see on HuffPost:


First Pictures From Priyanka Chopra And Nick Jonas' Engagement Celebrations Are Here

$
0
0

Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas are getting engaged in a private ceremony in Mumbai today.

The couple, who first met at MET Gala in New York, have been dating for the past several months and were photographed a few minutes ago in what appears to be a venue designed specifically for the ceremony.

According to reports, the engagement will take place according to Hindu rituals. A pandit (Hindu priest) was seen entering Chopra's Versova apartment, indicating that the preparations are in full swing for the couple.

According to sources, PC has invited only close friends for the ceremony and a bigger party has been planned for the Hindi film industry. Nick's brothers have also flown down for the celebrations.

(This story will be updated as more pictures trickle in)

Nick Jonas On Priyanka Chopra: I'm The Luckiest Guy In The World

$
0
0

After months of maintaining a stoic silence around their relationship, Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas finally announced their alliance on Instagram.

After their pre-wedding ceremony in Mumbai, which was attended by close friends and family members, Priyanka Chopra shared this picture on her Insta feed.

Taken.. With all my heart and soul..

A post shared by Priyanka Chopra (@priyankachopra) on

To which Jonas commented saying, "Wow congrats. He's the luckiest guy in the world," sending the internet into a tizzy.

The couple is expected to throw a reception party later on Saturday evening.

Guests from the Hindi film industry are likely to join the celebrations.

Here are some more pictures:

Will Umar Khalid Attack End Open-Door Policy At Constitution Club Of India?

$
0
0
NEW DELHI, INDIA-AUGUST 13: Umar Khalid with police men at the Constitution Club in New Delhi. (Photo by K Asif/India Today Group/Getty Images)

NEW DELHI — The attack on former JNU student Umar Khalid outside the Constitution Club of India (CCI) has revived interest in an institution that played a foundational role in the political life of India in the years immediately after independence, and remains an important staging post for each subsequent generation in search of their political awakening.

The storied campus has witnessed heated debate on everything from the birth of the Constitution, the rise of the socialist movement, the imposition of the emergency and now the ascent of the Bharatiya Janata Party.

The CCI was set up in February 1947 for the members of the Constituent Assembly who drafted India's Constitution. When that exercise was concluded in 1950, the club was reconceptualized as a forum for existing and former parliamentarians.

As the years passed, the club became a meeting place for activists and politicians of all stripes to meet journalists and supporters, primarily because it was a short walk from Parliament and was run by MPs from various parties—rather than by government committee.

Historian, author and former Jawaharlal Nehru University professor Mridula Mukherjee recalled that in the early days, the CCI "was always a very open space. It was not very fancily appointed, relatively simple buildings, modestly priced... I don't know how many meetings I must have attended there!"

The original building on Curzon Road (later renamed Kasturba Gandhi Marg) "was not fancy. Now, of course, it is all done up and all that. It's only in the past 2-3 years that they have made it into a five-star place," added Mukherjee.

In its current avatar on Rafi Marg, the CCI houses three different buildings, two of which have multiple large halls for hosting public meetings. A third building hosts the Mavlankar Hall which, said Mukherjee, may have been the biggest indoor meeting space in Delhi until Talkatora Stadium and others came up. BJP president Amit Shah has also addressed meetings here and Mukherjee believes this openness to different political viewpoints marks the CCI's character.

When asked if before this, the CCI has witnessed political violence of the sort witnessed last week when an assailant pulled a gun on Khalid, her categorical response was, "Never."

READ: Independence Day: Umar Khalid On The Need For 'Real Freedom' And The Consequences Of Hate

Former Rajya Sabha MP and Janata Dal (United)'s national spokesperson KC Tyagi, a life member of the club, also has fond memories of the CCI.

Of the Rafi Marg building, he said: "It used to be very peaceful. The CCI used to be a left-wing paradise in the 70s. So many anti-Indira Gandhi meetings were held there in 1974 and '75 before Emergency was imposed but no Youth Congress member ever dared attack the opposition," he said.

Tyagi earlier belonged to Chaudhary Charan Singh's Lok Dal, which also had an office in the vicinity. He recalls dozens of political parties being launched in the area surrounding the CCI.

"In 1978, Indira Gandhi's Congress party was born in the vicinity of the CCI. Any big meeting would happen in the adjacent Mavlankar Hall... After coming out of jail and becoming an MP in the elections held soon after the lifting of emergency, George Fernandes' first address to people was at Mavlankar Hall. Many people had come to hear him," Tyagi said.

As the country's politics changed over time, the CCI's nature also saw a shift. It is definitely not the "left-wing paradise" of the 70s anymore. Even so, it retains its openness and inclusivity.

After the attack on Khalid, CCI appears to have taken the issue of security more seriously. Governing council member and MP from Odisha, Kalikesh Singh Deo said, "We will have to start ramping up, looking at the security aspect of the club itself. It used to be open for everybody in the policy field or journalists and so on, but if such attacks are happening (and) if there is a possibility of people coming inside with weapons, I think it's time that the club becomes stricter."

When HuffPost India visited the CCI a day after the attack, it first seemed like there was nothing out of the ordinary. Many people had turned up to attend events and meetings and the policemen deployed prior to Independence Day were also present. However, there was a palpable wariness in the air.

A person who works at the private security agency which looks after the CCI's security said that they were being more careful after the incident.

"We changed the guard at the front gate because so many people were coming up to him and making inquiries that he couldn't work. We need to keep a record of vehicles visiting the club. How can it be done if we keep answering people's queries? We have added staff to monitor the premises," he said on condition of anonymity.

Also on HuffPost India:

Should Teachers Share Their Political Views With Students?

$
0
0
Educators must re-examine how we hold political discussions in the classroom.

When I first started teaching high school history, government and journalism a decade ago, I worked hard to appear politically neutral. I belong to one of America’s two major political parties, but I took pride in controlling my bias and selecting readings that (I hoped) would allow my young charges to make up their own minds regarding right and wrong, fair and unfair.

People at both ends of the political spectrum are quick to accuse teachers on the other side of unfairly influencing students. I refrained from sharing my political leanings even after students graduated, not out of a sense of intellectual superiority or to ignite frustration, but to curtail accusations of indoctrination and perceived bias. 

Students have accused me in the past of not having faith in their intellectual maturity. Quite the contrary. My job is to expose young minds to new ideas. I respect their intellectual maturity so much, I go to terrific lengths to avoid exerting untoward influence on what they choose to support or believe.

I was certain of that approach until my juniors and seniors expressed their disgust with Donald Trump’s 2015 presidential announcement speech. It promoted xenophobia and racism, they told me. Several pointed to an especially egregious line often cited during the following president campaign: “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. … They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

I started to wonder: Do students take my silent and neutral behavior as a sign of apathy or endorsement of Trump’s views? Does that alter the way they perceive me as their teacher?

These conversations became more frequent and urgent in my classroom after Trump’s election. My journalism class expressed outrage over one of the president’s tweets in February 2017, which read, “The FAKE NEWS media (failing @nytimes, @NBCNews, @ABC, @CBS, @CNN) is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American People!” 

I once believed in concealing my political thoughts unless I couldn’t in good conscience keep quiet. Trump’s remarks have repeatedly crossed that line for me, and as Abraham Lincoln said, “It is a sin to be silent when it is your duty to protest.”

My students asked for my take, so I told them, but rather than focus on venting what appeared to be a collective disdain, I urged them to look into why others felt differently.

Sharing my personal view left me conflicted; if I taught in South Carolina vs. Massachusetts, it’s likely many students would disapprove of my criticizing the president’s behavior. And part of me feels they would be justified in challenging me for it. As a mentor recently told me, “one teacher’s sense of ‘social justice’ is another teacher’s sense of ‘irresponsible judicial activism.’”  

So, as back-to-school season ramps up, this is the question educators across the country face: In the age of Trump, should teachers refrain from sharing their own political views, or does our current political schism call for a different approach?

Instead of 'appearing neutral' (a species of mild dishonesty, after all), let’s admit our biases openly.

As the legendary Bob Dylan sang in his 1964 album, “The times, they are a-changin’.” Just one year later, the first “teach-ins” occurred at the University of Michigan and Columbia University. Professors worked alongside students to hold antiwar seminars, and this political activism by teachers spread to college campuses around the country.

I’m not suggesting today’s teachers and professors do something similar by protesting or publicly supporting any of Trump’s policies. But I am suggesting that educators of students of all ages re-examine how we hold political discussions in the classroom.

Whether I decide to share or withhold my personal views about anything, my main concern should be with establishing a productive learning environment with students, treating them as people who have concerns that should be listened to, and helping them fashion their understanding of the world.

Teachers should know their students as individuals, not just as learners, before deciding whether to be open or opaque politically. I wouldn’t advise a teacher of any student to come out in favor of the president’s immigration remarks, for example. This would be insensitive, all the more so to our Latino students, and it would also lack academic value. But students would benefit from learning about and debating policies for and against immigration, undocumented or otherwise.

This year, I will continue refraining from making or repeating partisan humor or making off-the-cuff remarks that politically savvy students could pick up on. But I’ll also adopt a new approach as to how I handle politics in the classroom ― and I encourage other educators to consider doing the same.

Instead of “appearing neutral” (a species of mild dishonesty, after all), let’s admit our biases openly. Let’s express them, explain why we have come to hold them, clarify what is troubling to us about them, and then articulate our best version of our opponents’ arguments all in the spirit of encouraging our students to examine their own beliefs, scrutinize their own biases, and thereby move to higher levels of understanding.

This is something I hope all teachers, regardless of political affiliation, can agree on.

David Cutler teaches history, journalism and government at Brimmer and May, an independent PK-12 school in Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts. Follow him on Twitter at @SpinEdu. 

Kofi Annan, Former United Nations Secretary-General, Dead At 80

$
0
0

Kofi Annan, a former United Nations secretary-general, died at the age of 80 early Saturday at a hospital in Bern, Switzerland, following a short unspecified illness.

The Kofi Annan Foundation confirmed the death of the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, who was born in Ghana in 1938.

“His wife Nane and their children Ama, Kojo and Nina were by his side during his last days,” the foundation named after him wrote.

Annan became the seventh U.N. secretary-general (and its first black African one) in 1997, after rising through the system’s ranks from his first role at the World Health Organization of administrative and budget officer in 1962.

He remained in the top secretary-general position for two terms, until 2006. He won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2001, jointly with the U.N., for “revitalizing” the body and giving “priority to human rights.”

But as the Reuters news agency noted, Annan was criticized during his earlier time as head of the U.N.’s peacekeeping forces for failing “to halt the genocide in Rwanda in the 1990s.”

The international community failed Rwanda and that must leave us always with a sense of bitter regret,” Annan said, on reflection, in 2004. “I believed at that time that I was doing my best. But I realized after the genocide that there was more that I could and should have done to sound the alarm and rally support.”

The U.N. Oil-for-Food scandal also occurred on his watch. During his tenure, Annan campaigned against the second Iraq War. After leaving the top role, Annan later served as U.N. special envoy for Syria.

The Kofi Annan foundation has hailed Annan as “a global statesman and a deeply committed internationalist who fought throughout his life for a fairer and more peaceful world.” It called him “an ardent champion of peace, sustainable development, human rights and the rule of law.”

“He will be greatly missed by so many around the world, as well as the staff at the Foundation and his many former colleagues in the United Nations system,” it added. “He will remain in our hearts forever.”

Current U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres described Annan as a “guiding force for good,” “a good friend and mentor” and “someone I could always turn to for counsel and wisdom.”

He provided people everywhere with a space for dialogue, a place for problem-solving and a path to a better world,” Guterres said via a statement shared online. “In these turbulent and trying times, he never stopped working to give life to the values of the United Nations Charter. His legacy will remain a true inspiration for all of us.”

Ghana’s President Nana Akufo-Addo praised Annan for bringing “considerable renown to our country by this position and through his conduct and comportment in the global arena.” “He was an ardent believer in the capacity of the Ghanaian to chart his or her own course onto the path of progress and prosperity,” he added on Twitter.

The U.N.’s Migration Agency paid tribute to “visionary” Annan with this post:

Hundreds of tributes have also flooded in for the diplomat, including one recalling his humble reaction after being mistaken for Hollywood actor Morgan Freeman.

How Kofi Annan Once Reacted To Being Mistaken For Morgan Freeman

$
0
0

With the passing of former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan, stories of his kindness and good humor have come through with the many condolences.

One such story involves Annan being mistaken for actor Morgan Freeman while vacationing in Italy. Annan was looking for a respite from public life after leaving the U.N. at the end of 2006. He stayed at a friend’s hideaway, off the grid ― no TV, radio or newspapers. 

Kofi Annan, former United Nations secretary-general, attends the 2018 French Open.

A few weeks into their vacation, he and his wife went into town to buy a newspaper. A group of men in a shop appeared to recognize him and rushed over. Annan felt his anonymity had been ruined.

“Morgan Freeman, may I have an autograph?” one man said. Annan reportedly smiled, graciously signed “Morgan Freeman” with the man’s pen, and returned to his sabbatical.

“So when people say, ‘Here’s a man who needs no introduction,’” he told The Guardian in 2012, “I say to them, careful!”

Annan served as U.N. secretary-general from 1997 to 2006, and was the first black African to do so. He won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2001.

Annan died early Saturday in Switzerland at the age of 80.

Rain Abates In Flood-Hit Kerala, Fears Of Disease In Camps

$
0
0
An aerial view shows partially submerged road at a flooded area in the southern state of Kerala, India, August 19, 2018. REUTERS/Sivaram V

A deluge in India's flood-stricken southwestern state of Kerala finally let up on Sunday, giving some respite for thousands of marooned families, while authorities feared an outbreak of disease among two million people crammed into relief camps.

Incessant rains since Aug. 8 have caused the state's worst floods in a century, and at least 186 people have perished, many of them killed by landslides. The beaches and backwaters of Kerala are top destinations for domestic and international tourists, but far fewer visit during the monsoon season.

The India Meteorological Department forecast heavy rainfall only at one or two places of Kerala on Sunday and withdrew a red alert in several districts. Flood waters too began to recede from several places.

Using boats and helicopters, India's military has led rescue efforts to reach people in communities cut off for days by the floods, with many trapped on roof tops and the upper floors of their homes, and in desperate need of food and potable water.

Rescue teams were focused on the town of Chengannur on the banks of the Pamba River, where some 5,000 people are feared to be trapped, officials said.

More than 200,000 families have taken refuge at relief camps set up across the state, an official at the Kerala State Disaster Management office said. Kerala's chief minister had earlier said two million people had taken shelter in camps since the monsoon rains began three months ago.

Anil Vasudevan, who handles disaster management at the Kerala health department, said authorities had isolated three people with chickenpox in one of the relief camps in Aluva town, nearly 250 km (155 miles) from state capital Thiruvananthapuram.

He said the department was preparing to deal with a possible outbreak of water-borne and air-borne diseases in the camps, where an estimated two million people have taken shelter since the monsoon rains began three months ago.

Kerala, which usually receives high rainfall, has seen over 250 percent more rain than normal between Aug. 8 and Aug. 15, causing the state authorities to release water from 35 dangerously full dams, sending a surge into its main river.

As the rain abated on Sunday morning, one resident in Cheranelloor, a suburb of Kochi situated on the banks of the Periyar river, visited his home to see when he and his family could return.

"The entire house is covered with mud. It will take days to clean to make it liveable. All our household articles, including the TV and fridge have been destroyed," 60-year-old T P Johnny told Reuters.

Kochi's airport is closed due to waterlogging, and Jet Airways has arranged additional flights from Thiruvananthapuram for passengers holding confirmed tickets from Kochi.

India's national carrier Air India will operate ATR flights from the naval airport in Kochi to Bangalore and Coimbatore, starting Monday.

Late on Saturday, Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan said that there was no shortage of food in the state as traders had stocked up ahead of a local festival.

"The only problem is transporting it," he told reporters. "The central government and public have cooperated well in this effort to fight this disaster."

He also said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who visited the state on Saturday, announced an assistance of 5 billion Indian rupees ($71 million) against his request for 20 billion.

Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum of the United Arab Emirates, where many Keralites work, has also offered assistance to the state.


World Leaders Opt For China's Money Over The Rights Of 1 Million Jailed Muslims

$
0
0

WASHINGTON ― Now that United Nations experts have endorsed widespread reports that China is holding a million members of its Muslim minority Uighur community in internment camps, the Chinese government’s denials of a crackdown look flimsier than ever. Activists and reporters who have documented the repression appear vindicated and awareness about the crisis seems to be growing ― but there’s no certainty of resulting international pressure from governments like the United States that experts see as essential to forcing change.

“There’s very few countries in the world that have been vocal about the Uighur situation, even historically,” said Sean Roberts, a George Washington University professor and former U.S. Agency for International Development official. “The United States might have more leverage over China than any other country that might seek to sanction China but China also has a lot of leverage over the [U.S.] economically … I really think that in the end this can only be addressed by the [U.N.], which requires a lot of states coming together.”

The dilemma for world leaders is that so much of the global economy now relies on China ― Chinese manufacturing, Chinese consumers and Chinese investment. Since the Chinese government is so enmeshed in the country’s economy, to criticize even policies far removed from business like human rights violations is to risk becoming a target of political retribution through economic means. Beijing has exploited that fear to avoid even acknowledging its excesses. In some cases, it has even successfully forced other governments to aid its repression by handing over Uighurs living within their borders.

For years, particularly since a new top Chinese official took over the predominantly Uighur region of Xinjiang in 2016 and began instituting harsh new surveillance and measures like forcing families to host Communist Party officials in their homes, Beijing has felt it can treat the estimated 10 million Uighurs and other members of Muslim-minority communities as it pleases despite international law.

“There has not been comparable foreign government pressure” to the criticism from rights groups and analysts, said Maya Wang, a senior researcher at Human Rights Watch. “The Chinese government continues to act with impunity ... The camps’ very existence and construction shows the government thinks it can continue to do so.”

In some cases, small but influential countries with business ties with China have helped shield it from criticism. Greece last summer blocked a disparaging European Union statement on China’s human rights record, and it aligned with Hungary against a separate EU statement on Chinese regional expansionism in 2016.

The argument from Chinese partners like Greece is that such issues are better discussed in private. But advocates argue general silence around the targeting of Uighurs is the very reason their communities now exist in what U.N. expert Gay McDougall called a “no-rights zone.” 

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (R) chats with Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras (L) during a signing ceremony held at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China on July 4, 2016. 

“If one million Tibetans were arbitrarily detained in camps, there would be much stronger condemnation from the international community, which is a testament to the work of Tibetan advocacy groups around the world and people speaking strongly about rights issues there,” Peter Irwin of the World Uyghur Congress told HuffPost in an email. “This is perhaps why the Chinese government hasn’t gone to this extreme in Tibet.”

“The reason that we’ve seen things escalate to this extent … is at least in part because of the lack of response from the international community over the last three decades when [Uighurs] were targeted by discriminatory policies,” he added.

The Chinese policy in Xinjiang is now perhaps “more acute” than even the brutal upheavals during the country’s Cultural Revolution because it is planned in such detail and so specifically targeted on an ethnic and religious minority group, Roberts said.

The U.S. has been one of the few governments to at least pay lip service to *the need for change, through its support of a well-respected Uighur news service run by state-funded broadcaster Radio Free Asia and a consistent line for years from officials and lawmakers.

For Zubayra Shamseden, a Xinjiang native now working with the Uighur Human Rights Project in Washington, D.C., even that counts: “If there was no U.S. government or no U.N. to stand up, imagine what’s going to happen to Uighurs,” she said.  

Uighur groups estimate that more than a million members of the community now live outside China. They are primarily in Central Asia, but 10,000 are scattered around Europe, while about 5,000 are in the U.S., around 3,000 in Australia and up to 50,000 in Turkey, a country with which they share historical and cultural ties.

As a result, the crisis affects citizens in foreign countries as well. With arrests of Uighurs in China having surpassed the 1 million mark, essentially every family has a member or a friend who has been detained, subjected to lectures about loyalty to the Communist Party or even torture, Shamseden said.

“What’s happening inside the country is obstructing normal living” for Uighurs trying to live as productive citizens in countries abroad, she continued. In nations ranging from Egypt and Malaysia, they now also live in fear of being forced back to China.

The perceived lack of concern for Uighurs is especially striking coming from governments in Muslim-majority countries, given their rallying around the cause of the Palestinians and to some degree that of the persecuted Rohingya minority in Myanmar. Some of the most powerful of those governments, like Iran and Pakistan, are hoping to benefit from China’s massive Belt and Road Initiative, a transnational development plan seeking to tie Europe and Asia closer together.

“I’m not very religious, but at least I know the principles of our religion: If your brothers and sisters are suffering, you are too,” Shamseden said. “I don’t know why the Muslim world won’t really follow what that religion told me.”

The spike in attention to the Uighur cause thanks to the U.N. session that ended Monday could create momentum, particularly because it comes a few months ahead of another big international review of China’s approach to human rights scheduled for November. With the Trump administration eager to confront China on all fronts as it ramps up its trade war, Washington could see a benefit to highlighting the issue even more, for instance by using evidence of mass detention to place sanctions on powerful Chinese officials, Roberts said.

But the Trump administration has made that task potentially more difficult through its withdrawal from the U.N. Human Rights Council, which forfeited its official role in the November review. That makes it more important for governments like those in Europe to speak out, said Sarah Brooks, a program manager at the International Service for Human Rights.

Still, she and other experts believe the unprecedented U.N. finding could make China so wary of further criticism and damaging revelations that the government will become a little more receptive to external calls for change.

“You can’t necessarily stop a government from oppressing its own people,” Roberts said. “It’s a question of whether the tide could be turned to at least put enough pressure on China to … at the very least shut down those camps.”

Rudy Giuliani Stuns NBC's Chuck Todd: 'Truth Isn't Truth'

$
0
0

Rudy Giuliani on Sunday gave another eyebrow-raising TV interview, telling NBC’s Chuck Todd on Sunday he’s concerned about special counsel Robert Mueller interviewing President Donald Trump because the “truth isn’t the truth.”

The president’s attorney, appearing on “Meet The Press,” continued to attack the credibility of Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether Trump obstructed justice.

“Look, I’m not going to be rushed into having [Trump] testify so that he gets trapped into perjury,” Giuliani told Todd. “When you tell me that... he should testify because he’s going to tell the truth and he shouldn’t worry. Well, that’s so silly, because it’s somebody’s version of the truth ― not the truth.”

Todd, visibly perplexed, interrupted: “Truth is truth.” But Giuliani frantically fired back, prompting laughter from Todd.

″No it isn’t! Truth isn’t truth!” Giuliani responded. “The president of the United States says, ‘I didn’t ―’”

“Mr. Mayor, do you realize... this is going to become a bad meme,” Todd interrupted.

Though Trump has expressed interest in having Mueller’s team interview him, Giuliani has pushed back against the idea, warning his client that he could be caught in a “perjury trap.” For instance, he has repeatedly claimed Mueller could accuse Trump of lying under oath if he denies having had a discussion in February 2017 with then-FBI Director James Comey about former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

“Trump says, ‘I didn’t tell him.’ And the other guy says that he did say it,” Giuliani said Sunday. “Which is the truth?”

Giuliani on Sunday also doubled down on Trump’s stunning admission earlier this month that the infamous meeting in June 2016 at New York’s Trump Tower that included the president’s eldest son and a Russian with links to the Kremlin was to get dirt on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

“The meeting was originally for the purpose of getting information about Clinton,” Giuliani told NBC. “That was the original intention of the meeting. It turned out to be a meeting about another subject and it was not pursued at all.”

The Trump camp initially claimed the meeting among Donald Trump Jr, a Kremlin-linked lawyer and others was to discuss the adoption of Russian children by Americans. 

Kerala Floods: Relief Challenge Ahead As Rain Abates

$
0
0
An aerial view shows partially submerged buildings at a flooded area in the southern state of Kerala, India, August 19, 2018. REUTERS/Sivaram V

Flood-hit Kerala received some respite on Sunday as heavy rains finally let up but, with at least laks of people in relief camps, the state now faces the challenge of providing supplies and beginning the process of rebuilding infrastructure.

PTI reported that 210 people have lost their lives since 8 August as Kerala reels under the impact of the worst floods it has faced in almost a century.

While chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan has said that 7.24 lakh people have been shifted to relief camps, Malayala Manorama reported on Monday that the figure is likely to be much higher.

The state is also preparing to deal with possible outbreaks of epidemics in the camps.

A bulletin from India Meteorological Department, Thiruvananthapuram, said on Sunday that rainfall activity over Kerala "is likely to decrease further gradually" this week.

The crisis in Kerala, known for its strong diaspora, has received international attention. Pope Francis has called for the international community to provide "concrete support" to the state. Rulers of Gulf countries, where many Malayalis work, have also pledged assistance.

Thousands of Malayalis, both inside and outside the state, have been working on rescue and relief missions with authorities.

Fishing workers, no strangers to the unpredictability of nature themselves, have received particular praise for their role in the rescue efforts. The Indian Expressreported that over 1,400 fishermen from coastal villages of Thiruvananthapuram, Kollam, Alappuzha and Ernakulam have ventured into the most remote corners of the affected areas with their boats. Vijayan has said that the government will honour these fishing workers and bear the repair costs for boats. They will also be granted Rs3,000 per boat for each day of the rescue work.

Visit https://keralarescue.in/ to find out how you can help the state. You can also donate to the Chief Minister's Distress Relief Fund here.

Two Minor Girls Allegedly Gang Raped By 11 Men in Jharkhand

$
0
0
Students hold candles as they pray during a candlelight vigil for a gang rape victim, who was assaulted in New Delhi, in Ahmedabad December 31, 2012.

Eleven people were arrested for allegedly raping two minor girls in this district of Jharkhand, police said.

They were nabbed after a police team conducted raids in the Hirhi Harra Toli locality, Deputy Superintendent of Police Ashish Kumar Mahli told a press conference here on Sunday.

The accused, all aged between 18 and 28 years, had raped the girls on August 16 when they were going to the Hirhi Harra Toli area along with their neighbour, he said.

They were travelling on a motorcycle which developed snag near the Hirhi Railway bridge, the DSP said.

One of the girls called her friend over phone for help but he sent his 11 friends to the spot instead.

They took the girls to an isolated place, beat up their neighbour and drove him away.

The men then took turns to rape the girls, Mahli said.

The accused also snatched away mobile phones of the victims, he added.

A case was registered at Sadar police station on the basis of the statement of the girls.

The task force was formed on the directions of Superintendent of Police Priyadarshi Alok to investigate the incident. It was headed by Sub-Divisional Police Officer Arvind Kumar Verma and Mahli.

The team also recovered the mobile phones from the house of one of the accused, the DSP said.

Asian Games: Deepak Kumar, Bajrang Punia Apurvi Chandela and Ravi Kumar Bring Medals For India

$
0
0

India won two medals on day one of the Asian Games with wrestler Bajrang Punia defeating Japan's Takatani Daichi in the men's 65kg Freestyle final, and Apurvi Chandela and Ravi Kumar winning a bronze medal in 10m Air Rifle Mixed Team event.

Meanwhile, on day two, Deepak Kumar won a silver medal in men's 10m air rifle event after producing excellent scores at crucial junctures, pipping fancied teammate Ravi Kumar at the 18th Asian Games here today.

Deepak shot 247.7 to finish second on the podium behind China's Haoran Yang, who won the top prize with a Games record 249.1 at the JSC Shooting Range of this port city.

Bajrang, who came into the Asian Games as favourite to win the gold in this category, beat his Japanese opponent 11-8 in the final bout.

The 24-year-old Indian had won three consecutive gold medals -- CWG (Gold Coast), Tbilisi Grand Prix (Georgia) and Yasar Dogu International (Istanbul) -- ahead of the Asian Games.

En route to his gold medal bout, Bajrang defeated Khasanov Sirojiddin (Uzbekistan), Fayziev Abdulqosim (Tajikistan) and Batchuluun Batmagnai (Mongolia).

Apurvi and Ravi Kumar aggregated 429.9 after 42 shots in the 48-shot final and were in second spot for major part of the 48-shot finals before China overtook them to take the silver.

The strong Chinese pairing of Ruozhu Zhao and Haoran Yang ended with a score of 492.5. Chinese Taipei's Yingshin Lin and Shaochuan Lu claimed the gold, scoring 494.1.

Korea and Mongolia finished fourth and fifth respectively in the event held for the first time at the Games.

It was a maiden Asian Games medal for Chandela, who will be aiming for a better colour medal in the 10m air rifle. Chandela is also a multiple time World Cup winner and had bagged gold at 2014 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow.

Meanwhile, here's India's schedule on Day 2 of competitions at the 18th Asian Games on Monday.

Badminton:

Women's team event: 8am IST

India vs Japan

Men's team quarterfinal: 1pm IST

Inda vs Indonesia

Basketball

Women's Preliminary Round match: 9am IST

India vs Unified Korea

Handball

Men's handball: 10 am IST

India vs Malaysia:

Hockey

Men's Pool match: 7pm IST

Kabaddi

Womem's team event: 8:40am IST

India vs Thailand

Men's team event: 3pm IST

India vs South Korea

Sepaktakraw:

Men's Team Regu Preliminary Round

India vs Iran 8am IST

India vs Indonesia 2pm IST

Women's Team Regu Preliminary Round: 11am

India vs Lao

Shooting

Women's Trap event Qualification Day 2: 7am IST

Shreyasi Singh, Seema Tomar

Men's 10m Air Rifle Qualification: 6:30 am IST

Ravi Kumar, Deepak Kumar

Men's Trap Qualififcation Day 2: 8am IST

Manavjit Singh Sandhu

Women's 10m Air Rifle Qualification: 8:30 am IST

Elavenil Valarivan, Apurvi Chandela

Swimming

Men's 800m Freestyle Qualification: 8am IST

Advait Page

Men's 50m Backstroke: 8:22am IST

Srihati Nataraj, Arvind Mani

Men's 200m Individual Medley Qualification: 7:45am IST

Neel Roy

Men's 4 x 200m Freestyle Relay Qualification: 9:15 am IST

Taekwondo

Women's 53 Kg: 9am IST

Latika Bhandari

Tennis: Starts at 9am

Men's Singles: Prajnesh Gunneswaran vs M Rifqi Fitriadi

Ramkumar Ramanathan vs Kit Hong Wong

Men's Doubles:

Rohan Bopanna/Divij Sharan vs IA Susanto/DA Susanto

Sumit Nagal/Ramkumar Ramanathan vs Abhishek Bastola/SB Bajracharya

Women's Singles:

Ankita Raina vs Beatrice Gumulya

Karman Kaur Thandi vs Jargal Altansarnai

Mixed Doubles

Rohan Bopanna/Prarthana Thombare

Women's Doubles

Ankita Raina/Prarthana Thombare vs SM Khan/ U Suhail

Volleyball

Men's Preliminary 2:30pm IST

India vs Hong Kong

Wushu start 6pm IST

Men's Sanda -56kg

Santosh Kumar vs Zaid Ali Wazea

Men's Sanda -60kg

Bhanu Pratap Singh vs Foroud Zafari

Men's Sanda -60kg

Narender Grewal vs Jr Clemente Tabugara

Wrestling starts 12pm IST

Men:

Sumit 125 Kg

Women:

Vinesh Phogat 50 Kg

Pinki 53 Kg

Pooja Dhandhi 57 Kg

Sakshi Malik 62 Kg

Viewing all 46147 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>