Quantcast
Channel: Huffington Post India
Viewing all 46147 articles
Browse latest View live

Razzie Awards: Donald Trump Wins Worst Actor For Performances As Himself

$
0
0

And the Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor goes to...

... President Donald Trump for his performances as himself in Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit 11/9” and Dinesh D’Souza’s “Death of a Nation.”

Trump also scooped the dubious Razzie for Worst Screen Combo “for himself and his self-perpetuating pettiness” in both documentaries.

Check out the full 39th Razzie Awards announcement video shared online Saturday here:

Top White House aide Kellyanne Conway won the Worst Supporting Actress award for her role as herself in Moore’s movie — beating out first lady Melania Trump for her part in the same film.

The awards for Worst Picture and Worst Remake, Ripoff Or Sequel went to “Holmes & Watson.” Its star, John C. Reilly, and director, Etan Cohen, secured the Worst Supporting Actor and Director Razzies respectively.

Melissa McCarthy nabbed Worst Actress for her parts in “The Happytime Murders” and “Life of the Party,” while “Fifty Shades Freed” won Worst Screenplay. McCarthy also won the Redeemer Award, however, for “her more complex role” in “Can You Ever Forgive Me?”


No 'Mann Ki Baat' For 2 Months, Will Be Back In May After Elections: Modi

$
0
0

NEW DELHI  — Prime Minister Narendra Modi Sunday suspended his monthly ‘Mann ki Baat’ broadcast for March and April, and said he will be back with the programme on the last Sunday of May, by when results of the Lok Sabha elections are expected to be declared.

In this monthly address through the radio broadcast ― the 53rd since Modi came to power in 2014 ― he said he was doing so keeping in mind healthy democratic traditions.

“Elections are the biggest celebration of democracy. In the next two months, we will be busy in the hurly-burly of the general elections. I myself will also be a candidate. Respecting healthy democratic traditions, the next episode of ‘Mann Ki Baat’ will be broadcast on the last Sunday (May 26) of May,” Modi said.

Opposition parties have in the past demanded stopping the broadcast of Mann ki Baat during elections, saying it violated the model code of conduct as the interaction amounted to the misuse of the prime minister’s programme for political purposes.

Sounding confident of his return to power, he said he will begin the series of conversations under the programme from May with the “power of your blessings” and will keep speaking to people through ‘Mann ki Baat’ for years.

The fate of Modi’s ‘Mann ki Baat’ broadcast will depend on the results of the Lok Sabha elections as the programme will continue only if he is reelected and becomes prime minister.

This 10-Year-Old Is Fighting Climate Change By Skipping School

$
0
0

On Fridays at 9 a.m., 10-year-old Lilly Platt doesn’t head to school like other kids in her class. Instead, she takes placards and a keep-cup filled with hot chocolate, and stands outside the town hall in Zeist, just east of Utrecht in the Netherlands.

Her signs read “School Strikes for Climate.” For the last six months, Lilly has been on a peaceful protest for the planet.

“By missing school, I’m making a point about climate change, because what’s the point of learning if our future is being taken away?” Lilly asks.

Lilly echoes the rallying cry of the youth climate movement Fridays for Future, sparked by 16-year-old Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, who last year ditched school to protest outside parliament in Stockholm. Greta’s message was simple: She called for politicians to take action on climate change, and said she would strike from school ― her main hold of power as a student below voting age ― until the Swedish elections in September.  

When Lilly saw videos of Greta’s activism online, she knew what she needed to do.

“She was talking about the Paris agreement and the next generation. I thought, I just have to do this,” Lilly says.

Lilly Platt making a placard reading

Lilly has to do this because she believes her generation’s future is at risk. A landmark United Nations report last year warned we have less than 12 years to cut emissions by half and keep the planet’s warming to less than 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels to avoid the worst effects of climate change. 

By 2030, Lilly will be just 22. “I would like to see a world that still has the Amazon, that doesn’t have species going extinct every five seconds,” she says. “I want to see a world that has clean oceans, and that doesn’t have plastic pollution anywhere, and people live in harmony with nature; not people [who] only see money.”

The Netherlands is one of the largest greenhouse gas emitters in the European Union, and in October, a Dutch appeals court ordered the government to cut emissions faster than planned ― by at least 25 percent by 2020 (compared with 1990 levels). Now, Lilly wants to hold politicians to account.

“I’m protesting so the politicians will start to listen, and all governments will align to Paris agreement” and keep the planet from warming more than 1.5 degrees, she says. “School is the only thing children have. If the children strike on the weekend, it doesn’t make a difference.” 

Lilly Platt (left) at the Hague in the Netherlands, with Greta Thunberg (right), the 16-year-old Swedish climate change campaigner.

Originally from London, Lilly’s family moved to the Netherlands in 2014. She decided she wanted to try to save the planet three years ago, at age 7, after counting 91 pieces of plastic waste while she was out walking with her grandfather. “My grandpa told me everything that falls on the ground eventually comes to the ocean. Then I decided I have to do something about this, I have to pick it up.”

She started a litter-picking campaign, sharing photos and videos on social media throughLilly’s Plastic Pickup. She’s since been invited to international environment conferences, and is now a youth ambassador for the Plastic Pollution Coalition, an anti-plastic alliance based in California, and HOW Global, a global development NGO.

“I’ve never stopped picking up plastic,” she says. “Last year we worked out it was 25,000 pieces.”

It may seem a lot for one 10-year-old to take on, but she’s not so different from other children. Lilly has an encyclopedic knowledge of dinosaurs, a love of drawing and Studio Ghibli. And it’s her wide-eyed, youthful energy that gives her this passion and ability to see things in black and white. She picks up plastic trash from the ground. She avoids single-use plastics. She sits outside her town hall holding placards. Because, if she doesn’t do it, who will?

 Lilly on school strike with her supporters.

Lilly has been striking since Sept. 21. With official permission, she strikes for an hour on Fridays, before heading back to school. She’s always accompanied by her mom, Eleanor Platt, a former teacher. Over time, she’s had storytellers, journalists, activists and even the town mayor sit with her in the civic center.

The mayor “said he wanted to show appreciation of what she’d been doing for the climate,” says Eleanor Platt. “He said Lilly was really a teacher, and they are the pupils.” 

Throughout her campaign, Lilly has watched the youth climate movement spread across the world. Tens of thousands of teenagers and children have taken to the streets in Australia, Belgium and the U.K. to voice frustration about the older generation’s inaction on climate change.

Similarly, in the U.S., more and more young people are rising up to demand action. Kids from almost 30 states have signed up for aclimate strike in the U.S. next month, while Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) pushes for her Green New Deal, a sweeping climate plan for the U.S. to decarbonize in just a decade. 

“It’s amazing that people are going this far to protect the environment and nature,” Lilly says.

But as her voice gets louder, she is exposed to more criticism. Lilly has attracted the attention of trolls and climate deniers through social media. They claim she’s been forced to do this by her mother, and denounce her protest as truancy.

Eleanor Platt supports Lilly, but says she is not driving her agenda. Lilly continues to do well at school, and after all, misses just one hour a week.

The online abuse has been overwhelming at times. Eleanor Platt says she has had to log Lilly out of social media accounts (her mum supervises the accounts and they use social media together), as the 10-year-old has received hateful messages and comments comparing the climate protestors with child soldiers who have been indoctrinated.

“As a parent you can support your child, but you really have to [police] this whole thing properly, to make sure they are safe,” her mom adds.

“Sometimes people write to me and say, you really need to let her be a child.”

Lilly interrupts her mom: “But this is what I want to do! I don’t want to look back on a few years and think, ‘Why didn’t I do anything?’ I don’t want to be the person to just sit back and watch the world become warmer and warmer.”

Lilly’s thick-rimmed glasses drop down her nose when she jumps up with excitement. “Let the children be what they want to be, and not what you want them to be,” she says. “Let them have this green heart and help the environment, instead of you trying to control them to go back to not caring for the climate. 

“Also, I do not want to play with dolls or Lego. This is what I want to do.”

Lilly will continue her Friday strike until the global climate protests on March 15, an international day of strikes led by students. More than 40 countries have already signed up, from Germany to Uganda, and at least 30 U.S. states.

“Children can make a change,” Lilly says. “It’s not only grown-ups who can save the planet.”

For more content and to be part of the “This New World” community, follow our Facebook page. 

HuffPost’s “This New World” series is funded by Partners for a New Economy and the Kendeda Fund. All content is editorially independent, with no influence or input from the foundations. If you have an idea or tip for the editorial series, send an email to thisnewworld@huffpost.com

'We Want Peace': Pakistan MP Meets Modi And Swaraj, Offers to Mediate Between Govts

$
0
0

A parliamentarian from Pakistan met Prime Minister Narendra Modi and External Affairs Minister Sushmwa Swaraj on Saturday, after offering to mediate between the Indian and Pakistani governments.

Ramesh Kumar Vankwani, a member of the ruling Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), expressed hope that the two countries “don’t indulge in any blame game and together move ahead on the path of peace and prosperity”.

After meeting Modi, Swaraj and minister of state for external affairs VK Singh, Vankwani told ANI, “I assured that there is no Pakistani involvement in Pulwama attack. We should move in a positive direction, we want peace.”

The patron of the Pakistan Hindu Council was in India as part of a 220-member delegation from 185 countries who attended the Kumbh Mela on an invite of the government. 

Vankwani made a fervent appeal to the governments of India and Pakistan to defuse tension in the wake of the Pulwama terror attack, saying New Delhi will benefit the most if the two neighbours joined hands.

The two countries should not allow the use of their soils against each other, Vankwani said.

On the rising tension post the terror attack, the lawmaker from Pakistan premier Imran Khan’s party said his government “does not want such a situation”. 

Vankwani said he shares a spiritual connection with India and visits the country twice every year, even if it’s not a government-sponsored trip.

Forty CRPF personnel were killed and many wounded when a suicide bomber rammed an explosive-laden vehicle into their bus in Pulwama in Jammu and Kashmir on February 14. The Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed claimed responsibility for the attack.

The Indian government has been working diplomatic channels to “isolate Pakistan” at international forums for providing support to terrorism.

(With PTI inputs)

'LKG' Review: Kindergarten-Level Primer On Tamil Nadu Politics, Society, Cinema, And Youth

$
0
0

LKG is the story of Lalgudi Karuppaiyya Gandhi, a small town politician with big political ambitions. Set in post-Jayalalithaa Tamil Nadu, LKG traces the journey of a shrewd ward-councillor towards becoming the state’s chief minister. This journey, while largely predictable and fairly lazy, isn’t entirely unwatchable.

The first act of LKG rings rooted and real. LKG is the councillor of Lalgudi. He is popular, informed, helpful, grounded, and reliable. RJ Balaji fits perfectly into this role: he is believable as LKG, even charming in his idiosyncrasies. He wears a black shirt with saffron veshti — “I want the votes of both the theist and the atheist”, he explains. He counts every single vote and takes pleasure in having won them.

His biggest fear is turning into his father, the rare good politician, whom LKG sees as a loser. Nanjil Sampath — the Thirukkural-spouting father —  is beautiful as the neglected man. He embodies the vulnerabilities in LKG’s life, making him more human. LKG, however, as if fighting to not become his father, is manipulative and corrupt. But we begin by believing that he’s perhaps the least of all evils.

As LKG desires bigger things, we’re told that his small-town rootedness isn’t enough. He needs the help of a large campaign management company to play the big game. Enter Sarala Munisamy (who prefers to be called Sara M Samy), played by Priya Anand, a campaign manager so out of place and ordinary that I nearly began worrying for LKG’s career.

Priya Anand appears as corporate as Kajol appeared in Velai Illa Pattadhaari 2 (2017): she is intended to be modern and ambitious, but ends up looking uncomfortable and uninteresting. Not because the actress is unskilled, but because the character is written without empathy — her role is reduced to spouting strange jargons and lazy generalisations, without any boost of intelligence or insight.

Sara makes LKG take PEET (Politics Eligibility and Entrance Test) where she asks him lame questions and he gives her wrong answers. She changes his thoughtful clothing into commonplace white-and-white. She introduces him to ‘meme culture’ and turns him into a laughing stock. From there, a bunch of absurdities take him to meet the CM and his life takes off.

It is here that the film gets confusing — LKG now turns into the story about Lalgudi Karuppaiyya Gandhi’s fight to win the election against Ramaraj Pandian, a veteran and widely respected politician. By the nature of the narrative, LKG is the underdog who follows the hero’s journey: he is the Lalgudi David fighting the Ramaraj Goliath. It is only natural that we root for LKG. Yet, he is no better than the evil Goliath he seems to be fighting. He’s as cunning and indifferent as the entire political environment he is in.

As a result, the film leaves the audience with every modern voter’s existential crisis: Kadaiseela yaarukku thaanda vote podradhu? (In the end, who the hell do we vote for?). The moral of the story is that the voter needs to be diligent and careful while voting. Meh.

RJ Balaji and friends (credited as writers of the film) safely follow the template of political films these days — think NOTA (2018), Sarkar (2018) and the like. They position the protagonist’s young age as qualification, include real-life events in the screenplay, cautiously critique the central government, use Internet-wielding youngsters for plot-twists, throw mud at corporates, discredit the media and blame the public of being corrupt.

The difference is that, unlike the idealistic nature of the other films, LKG is cynical in both its outlook and outcome.

It takes a dig at every place, at everyone it possibly can. While most of it punches up, there is also a significant part of the film that’s misogynistic and homophobic. There is a scene where they discuss a highway between Lalgudi and Luz Corner. RJ Balaji says, “already moonu road irukku saar” (there are already three roads that cover this journey). As if that didn’t meet their humour metre, his sidekick Mayilsamy says, “Oru pondaatiye kaapaatha mudiyala, moonu pondaatti kekkudhaa” (you’re unable to protect one wife, why do you need three?).

While discussing LKG’s sacrifices for the sake of politics, dialogues fall back on lazy tropes like bunching “kudi, cigarette-u and ponnunga” (alcohol, smoking and women) together to proclaim that he’s never indulged in any of them.

There’s a moment in the film that implies that LKG may have fallen in love with Sara. Minutes later, he’s called by the CM for a meeting and he tells her, “Thank god, you rejected my proposal. Now, I don’t have to buy property in your name, I can keep all the money to myself”. The attempted joke here is that LKG isn’t your regular fare with a force-fitted love track. Which is true. Yet, the film ends up being your regular unfunny fare in implying that women marry for and usurp men’s money!

There is a sequence with Manobala, playing an actor, that’s scarily homophobic and transphobic at the same time. In it, LKG spreads a rumour that Ramaraj Pandian was earlier a woman. When Pandian goes to meet Manobala to seek his endorsement for the upcoming election, Manobala feels him up and tries to seduce him. (Sidenote: Manobala must stop acting as the sleazeball. He should know better than that!) Pandian leaves in disgust and anger, only to later flash a female reporter to prove his manhood.

For the most part, LKG is not misogynistic, homophobic or transphobic. It’s lazy. There is a female TV anchor who speaks ‘local Tamil’ off camera and coy Tanglish on air, a trope comedian Vivek milked to its maximum nearly 15 years ago! There is an introduction sequence for Ramaraj Pandian, where he sings to tame a bull, and punches a rowdy to the moon! If we hadn’t yet noticed, Sarala helpfully suggests, “enna saar, Ramaraj pandian-a pathi ketta, neenga actor Ramarajan-a pathi solringa?” (Why are you telling me about actor Ramarajan, when I ask of Ramaraj Pandian).

These scenes play out like a skit in a Mad Ads competition in a college fest, one dig followed by another. There are digs at “unga toothpaste-la uppirukka?” (is there salt in your toothpaste?) and Abbas selling toilet cleaner, for good measure. Much of the film’s humour or even political acumen is dependent on funny events of the recent past. So, if the mere sight of RJ Balaji standing by a river holding planks of thermocol throws you into a fit of laughter, LKG is for you.

But if you’re seeking a deeper, more scathing satirical insight into the politics of Tamil Nadu, please join the line.

'Captain Marvel' Movie Rating Suffers After Trolls Post Disturbing Reviews

$
0
0

If you’ve been keeping up with “Captain Marvel” news the past couple of days, you might’ve read some headlines claiming trolls are already “bombing” the Brie Larson movie’s Rotten Tomatoes score and “flooding” the film’s page with sexist comments. 

Since the news hit, it appears several (around 15 or so) of those trolling comments have been removed, according to screenshots HuffPost took on Tuesday. But there might be an entirely new onslaught of people now downvoting the film.

It’s dizzying. It’s exhausting. And, yes, it’s all happening pre-release. So with time on our hands before the movie debuts on March 8, we decided to take a look at what’s really going on.

HuffPost first noticed the troll attacks on “Captain Marvel” earlier this week thanks to stories from a few fandom blogs and Screen Rant, which pointed out, “Most of the trolls’ comments are about Larson being a vocal feminist and how this movie pushes feminism to the forefront of the [Marvel Cinematic Universe].”

Rotten Tomatoes allows audience members to express online whether they want to see a movie before it’s released, amounting to a “want to see” rating that is eventually replaced by an audience score once the movie hits theaters.

Before a movie is released:

After a movie is released:

Users can add comments about their opinion before the movie comes out, too, so the mere existence of pre-viewing commentary isn’t out of the ordinary.

But the latest comments for “Captain Marvel” seem to follow a disturbing theme: One person said they couldn’t be paid to see the “SJW laden, white male hating worthless POS movie.” Others claimed, without much context, that Larson had “sexist and racist attitudes.”

Rotten Tomatoes screenshot from Tuesday, Feb 19.

These commenters appeared to reference an interview that Larson had with Marie Claire earlier this month where she talked about wanting to speak to a more inclusive pool of journalists, ones that weren’t “overwhelmingly white male.” Larson’s words reiterate what she said while accepting an award for excellence in film at the Crystal + Lucy Awards in 2018.

Pointing out the disparity between the number of white male movie reviewers and the number of women reviewers and reviewers of color, Larson said, “I do not need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn’t work for him about ‘A Wrinkle in Time.’ It wasn’t made for him. I want to know what that film meant to women of color, to biracial women, to teen women of color, to teens that are biracial. And for the third time, I don’t hate white dudes. These are just facts. These are not my feelings.” 

These comments were revisited in a Hollywood Reporter piece about Larson on Feb. 13.

Around this time, there was also a call on 4chan to boycott “Captain Marvel,” though it didn’t appear to gain much traction in the message board where many alt-right posters congregate. On Tuesday, another 4chan thread prompted users to call the movie “propaganda” and critique Larson’s appearance, labeling her “sexist and racist against white man [sic],” similar to the comments that appeared on Rotten Tomatoes.

Rotten Tomatoes has taken a stand against commenters’ inflammatory rhetoric in the past. Following news that some users were staging an organized effort to lower the rating for “Black Panther,” Rotten Tomatoes released a statement in 2018 explaining that the site doesn’t condone hate speech and has a team in place that closely monitors the platform to remove such comments:

We at Rotten Tomatoes are proud to have become a platform for passionate fans to debate and discuss entertainment and we take that responsibility seriously. While we respect our fans’ diverse opinions, we do not condone hate speech. Our team of security, network and social experts continue to closely monitor our platforms and any users who engage in such activities will be blocked from our site and their comments removed as quickly as possible.

We reached out to Rotten Tomatoes on Tuesday to inquire about the language used in posts about “Captain Marvel,” and the company declined to comment. But since that time, some of the harmful or explicit comments that news outlets had been reporting on have been removed. 

On Tuesday, there were six pages of audience reviews. But as of 10 a.m. on Wednesday, there were five. Comparing the screenshots we took on Tuesday with the reviews on the page Wednesday, it’s immediately evident that a number of the reviews attacking Larson are gone. All signs point to Rotten Tomatoes following up on its promise from last year to monitor hateful behavior on its site.

However, while a decrease in Rotten Tomatoes comments attacking Larson (note: not all negative comments had been deleted as of press time) is a good sign, the film is facing another obstacle on the site: Its “want to see” rating is in a tailspin.

As of Feb. 19., “Captain Marvel” had around 5,000 user ratings, with 78 percent expressing that they want to see the movie.

Rotten Tomatoes screenshot from Tuesday, Feb 19.

On the morning of Feb. 20, the user ratings had increased to more than 9,000, and the “want to see” percent had dropped to 60. By Thursday, that number had climbed to more than 14,000 ratings and the percentage had dropped to 55. As of Friday, it was 15,000 ratings and the percentage was down to 53.

Rotten Tomatoes screenshot from Friday, Feb 22.

Is this how audiences actually feel about the first female-led Marvel film? Or is it some sort of organized effort to try to affect the reception of “Captain Marvel”?

When “Star Wars: The Last Jedi” earned an abysmal audience score in 2017, rumors circulated claiming bots had carried out an attack on the film’s Rotten Tomatoes page. Rotten Tomatoes refuted those claims, telling HuffPost that year, “There’s nothing unusual in the behavior.”

When HuffPost reached out to Rotten Tomatoes again for comment on the declining “want to see” rating of “Captain Marvel,” the company did not respond.

And while, yes, this is a Marvel movie, which seems like a golden ticket for box office success, Rotten Tomatoes ratings can affect films. Just look at Matthew McConaughey’s sexy, steamy box office bomb “Serenity.” Film distributors opted not to publicize the movie as much after it received a bad Rotten Tomatoes score.

It’d be troubling if trolls seeking publicity got even more vocal moving forward, but, encouragingly, since Wednesday a number of more positive comments denouncing trolls have shown up on the page.

On Thursday, Larson was asked to elaborate on her comments about inclusivity by FOX 5 DC. “What I’m looking for is to bring more seats up to the table,” the actress said. “No one is getting their chair taken away. There’s not less seats at the table, there’s just more seats at the table.”

Ultimately, Captain Marvel is one of the strongest characters in the MCU. Actual reviews will be out March 5, but with the movie’s already stellar early social media reactions, it looks like Thanos (and disgruntled trolls) are “f**ked.”

Modi Launches Cash Transfer Scheme PM-KISAN For Farmers, BJP Says Don't Question Timing

$
0
0

LUCKNOW — Prime Minister Narendra Modi Sunday launched the ambitious Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi scheme transferring the first instalment of Rs 2,000 each to over one crore farmers.

Launching the scheme from Uttar Pradesh’s Gorakhpur, the prime minister said the first instalment of money under the scheme has been deposited in accounts of 1.01 crore farmers and those who didn’t get it on Sunday will get it in due course. 

“This is your money and no one will be able to take it from you,” he told the farmers. 

The prime minister said the scheme has been made foolproof so that no one can take away the right of the farmers. 

There is no role of middleman in this scheme, he said.

In the interim Budget 2019-20, the central government had announced the PM-KISAN scheme under which Rs 6,000 per year will be given in three instalments to 12 crore small and marginal farmers holding cultivable land up to two hectares.

Timing should not be questioned: BJP

The BJP said the timing of government launching any welfare scheme should not be questioned as no time frame can be attached in advance to such measures.

BJP Kisan Morcha president and Bhadohi MP Virendra Singh Mast said, “It is wrong to say that the government is reminded of farmers during the election season only. There is no time frame decided in advance for taking any welfare step. The opposition parties have nothing to say.” 

In an interview, Mast told PTI that a number of farmers welfare schemes were launched by the government in the past nearly five years.

'My Heart Is Heavy': Janhvi Kapoor Remembers Mother Sridevi On First Death Anniversary

$
0
0

MUMBAI — A year has gone by since Indian film industry lost its first female superstar, Sridevi and on her first death anniversary daughter, actor Janhvi Kapoor says her heart still feels heavy.

Janhvi, who made her acting debut last year in July with Dhadak, says her mother will always be there in her heart. 

Sridevi passed away, aged 54, due to accidental drowning in a Dubai hotel on February 24, 2018. Her sudden death left family, friends and thousands of fans in a state of shock.

“My heart will always be heavy. But I’ll always be smiling because it has you in it,” Janhvi wrote on Instagram, alongside a picture of her sitting in her mother’s lap holding hands.

Sridevi’s sister-in-law, designer Maheep Kapoor shared a series of pictures with the actor on Instagram and wrote, “Will always remember the good times.”  

In an impressive career, spanning five decades, Sridevi dominated the commercial space in cinema in the ’80s and ’90s. She reversed the trend of the male-dominated film industry by her acting prowess. Her name guaranteed a film’s success.

She started acting at the age of four and made her debut in 1969 with M A Thirumugham’s Tamil film Thunaivan. She continued working in Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam and Kannada movies but became a national film icon courtesy her Bollywood films. 

Sridevi made her Hindi film debut as a child artiste in 1975 hit Julie and continued ruling the South Indian film industry where she established herself as a leading heroine with films such as 16 Vayathinile, Sigappu Rojakkal, Meendum Kokila and Moondram Pirai.

In Bollywood, she made her debut as a lead actor in 1978′s Solva Sawan and followed it up with a number of commercial hits such as Himmatwala, Mawaali, Tohfa, Mr India, Chandni, Lamhe, Nagina and Khuda Gawah among several others.

Mr India director Shekhar Kapur said he still finds it difficult to come to terms with Sridevi’s sudden demise.

“Still can’t get over that this bundle of life, of energy, of love, left us when she has so much much more to give,” he wrote.

Sridevi took a break from acting after 1997 film Judaai to focus on her marriage with producer Boney Kapoor and daughters Janhvi and Khushi. 

She made a successful comeback 15 years later with Gauri Shinde’s “English Vinglish”. 

The actor also had a starring role in 2015 Tamil film Puli and followed English Vinglish with another successful outing 2018′s Mom, which was her last film. She also won a National Award posthumously for her performance in the movie.

Shinde remembered Sridevi as the “biggest talent” on earth. 

“I miss her laughter, miss her saying my name ‘Gauuuurrri’ only she said it in this unique way. I miss her calls, our dinners, her warm hug. (I) Miss the biggest talent that there was on this earth,” the director told PTI.

Veteran actor Shabana Azmi took to Twitter and wrote, “A year already. #Sridevi. You will live on through your work.” 

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee also remembered the actor.

“Fondly remembering Sridevi, legendary actress, on her death anniversary. She is gone too soon,” Banerjee wrote on Twitter.

Choreographer-turned-filmmaker Farah Khan said Sridevi has been her source of motivation from the beginning of her career. 

“She was so supportive, so encouraging, getting to choreograph a Sridevi show or a song for her was like a dream. No wonder I never got awed or starstruck with any other star in my entire career because I started from the TOP! There never was and never will be anyone like SRIDEVI... Love her always,” she wrote alongside a picture from a early ’90s world tour with the actor.

In her Instagram Story, Shilpa Shetty shared a picture with Sridevi and wrote, “You are in our thoughts. RIP.” 


Protests Rock Arunachal Pradesh; Vehicles, Deputy CM's House Set On Fire

$
0
0
Arunachal Deputy CM Chowna Mein

ITANAGAR — Defying curfew, agitators allegedly set ablaze the private residence of Arunachal Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Chowna Mein and ransacked the office of the deputy commissioner here on Sunday to protest against recommendations to grant permanent resident certificates to six communities, police said.

A large number of people marched through streets here damaging public property and vehicles after a person who was injured in police firing on Friday succumbed to injuries at a hospital, police said.

The protesters set ablaze the private residence of the deputy chief minister at Niti Vihar here and ransacked the office of the deputy commissioner of Itanagar.

They also set on fire a large number of vehicles parked in the compound of the DC’s office.

The protesters also attacked the Itanagar Police station and several public properties in the state capital, police said.The agitators also blocked the road leading to the Naharlagun railway station as a result many passengers, including patients, were held up at the station since Sunday morning.

An indefinite curfew was clamped in Itanagar and Naharlagun on Saturday as protesters resorted to stone pelting in which 35 people, including 24 police personnel, were injured.The Army had also conducted flag marches in Itanagar and Naharlagun on Saturday. 

Internet services remained suspended in Itanagar and Naharlagun. All markets, petrol pumps and shops were closed and most of the ATMs in the state capital were out of cash, police said.

Over 60 vehicles, including many police vehicles, were set ablaze and over 150 vehicles were damaged by the protesters since Friday, they said.

On Saturday, the agitators damaged the stage of the Itanagar International Film Festival at the Indira Gandhi Park here. The organisers later called off the film festival. 

The Joint High Power Committee (JHPC), after holding parleys with the stakeholders, recommended granting permanent resident certificates (PRCs) to six communities, who are not natives of Arunachal Pradesh but has been living in Namsai and Changlang districts for decades.

The proposals evoked resentment among several community-based groups and students’ organisations, who claimed that the rights and the interests of indigenous people will be compromised if the state government accepts them.

The recommendation of the JHPC was supposed to be tabled in the Assembly on Saturday but was not tabled as the Speaker adjourned the House sine die.

On Saturday, Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh appealed to the people of Arunachal Pradesh to remain calm and maintain peace.

He also spoke to Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu, who briefed him about the prevailing situation in the border state.

Governor Calls For Calm As Additional CRPF Deployed In J&K, Govt Issues Orders On Ration, Fuel

$
0
0
Paramilitary soldiers stop an ambulance driver during restrictions in old city Srinagar, Kashmir on February 24, 2019.

JAMMU — In a bid to end the simmering ‘war hysteria’ in Jammu and Kashmir, especially in the valley, Governor Satya Pal Malik Sunday appealed that people should remain calm and not believe in rumours “circulating widely” to vitiate the atmosphere.

He also clarified that the induction of para-military forces should only be seen in the context of conducting elections and should not be attributed to any other cause. 

“People should not believe in rumours, which are of extreme nature and circulating widely in some quarters. They should remain calm. These rumours are unnecessarily creating an atmosphere of fear in the minds of people, leading to stress and disruption to normal life. Rumours about curfews and other actions should not be believed,” the governor said in his appeal. 

He said “some security-related actions” were being taken after the February 14 Pulwama attack in which 40 CRPF personnel lost their lives when a terrorist of Jaish-e-Mohammed terror group blew himself next to a convoy.

“This attack was an unprecedented one. The response of security forces is guided solely by the need to counter both the impact and any further action that may be taken by terrorist groups who are still out to disrupt our country and its democratic processes,” he said.

The statement from the governor came after the state administration issued many orders including supplying ration at the earliest, cancelling leave of doctors and policemen, rationing of petrol to the general public, leading to a war hysteria. The widespread arrests of Jamaat-e-Islami cadres and separatists contributed to these rumours.

The flying of IAF jets in dead hours of the night in Kashmir Valley also added to these fears despite the IAF maintaining it was a routine exercise.

The governor also addressed the issue of safety and security of Kashmiris residing outside the state. He said Prime Minister Narendra Modi has given clear directions to the country Saturday that there is no fight against Kashmiris but that it is a fight for Kashmir.

This is a clear signal that the people of Jammu and Kashmir are not only integral part of India but it is the responsibility of the country to take care of their safety wherever they may be, he said.

“Over 22,000 Kashmiri students are studying outside the state and the number of students who have actually been injured or hurt in incidents is not even in single digits....the exaggerated reporting has led to unnecessary excessive reactions in the Kashmir Valley,” he said.

The governor said it was necessary for everyone to avoid fear-mongering and not to worsen matters. 

He also re-assured all government employees and their families, who stay in Jammu, that their safety and security was of primary importance. 

Ahead of the appeal, the governor chaired an informal meeting of the State Administrative Council (SAC) here to review the current situation in the state, particularly in the context of the terror attack in Pulwama on February 14 and the subsequent developments, an official spokesman said.

In the meeting, Malik was briefed about the current security situation in Jammu city after the lifting of the curfew a few days ago and also the restoration of normalcy in the place.

After the Pulwama incident, an official spokesman said, security concerns are much higher with the possibility of terrorist organisations increasing their activities against candidates and voters on a much larger scale.

“Normally, forces are inducted a month before elections so that they settle down and familiarise with the ground situation. It is in this context that 100 companies of central forces are being inducted into the state at the moment. This is less than the actual additional forces required and more would be inducted in the coming weeks,” he said.

The spokesman said the SAC was also informed that the supply situation of petroleum and other products in the Kashmir Valley is critically low.

“The availability of petrol in the Kashmir Valley is adequate to meet the needs for just one day and that of diesel for four days. There is no stock of LPG in the Kashmir Valley. This is a result of the earlier blockage of the national highway for seven days and the ongoing blockage for the past four days, leading to disruption of supplies from Jammu to Srinagar,” he said.

As a precautionary measure, the Kashmir divisional commissioner has rationed petrol and diesel supply to conserve whatever is available for emergency purposes.

“Steps are being taken to increase the availability of stocks in the Kashmir Valley. People of the state should not read anything more into this but see it only as an administrative measure in a shortage situation,” the spokesman said.

“On the medicine front also, the instructions to hospitals to increase availability of medicines is also to be seen in the context of shortage of supplies as a result of the prolonged disruption in transport,” he said.

124 Dead In Assam In India's 2nd Hooch Tragedy This Month, 16 Arrested

$
0
0
 

GUWAHATI, Assam — At least 124 people have died from drinking toxic bootleg liquor in Assam, the second such tragedy in the country this month, with many more hospitalised as authorities try to pinpoint the source and round up perpetrators.

331 people are undergoing treatment in hospitals, officials said on Sunday.

At least 71 people have died in Jorhat Medical College Hospital (JMCH), where another 272 are under treatment, a senior Health Department official told PTI.

Four more died in Titabor Subdivision Hospital in Jorhat district, he said.

In Golaghat district, the death count was 49, while 59 people are admitted in Golaghat Civil Hospital, the official told PTI.

Some of the deaths at homes have not been reported to authorities, he said.

A large number of labourers of two tea estates of Golaghat and Jorhat districts had fallen ill after drinking spurious liquor on Thursday night and 12 of them had died the same night.

Chief Minister Sarbananda Sonowal and Health Minister Himanta Sarma had on Saturday reviewed the condition of victims undergoing treatment at JMCH.

Sonowal announced a monetary compensation of Rs 2 lakh to the next of kin of the deceased and Rs 50,000 to those who fell ill.

He also ordered an inquiry into the incident by Upper Assam Division Commissioner Julie Sonowal on Friday and directed her to submit the report within a month.

Doctors from Assam Medical College Hospital of Dibrugarh district, Gauhati Medical College Hospital and Tezpur Medical College Hospital in Sonitpur district have been rushed to the Jorhat and Golaghat hospitals to provide medical care, Sarma said.

Besides, the Director of Medical Education Anup Barman, directors of Health, Assam and the National Rural Health Mission will be stationed in Jorhat to supervise and coordinate services being provided to patients, the minister had said on Saturday.

Hospital authorities have also been instructed to provide food for attendants of the hooch victims, besides the mandatory health care facilities and medicines.

1,500 people may have consumed spurious liquor

In Assam, bootleg liquor production and consumption is usually found in and around the state’s tea plantations where it is consumed by poorly-paid labourers.

There were about 10 different distilleries producing the spurious liquor that went to various tea plantations and other areas, Mrinal Saikia, a local lawmaker from the Bharatiya Janata Party, told Reuters.

But the main ingredient used in the country liquor was supplied by one person from a nearby area, he said.

“Close to about 1,500 people must have consumed that lot of spurious liquor on Thursday that led to the deaths of 150,” Saikia told Reuters.

Police have arrested 16 people so far.

“We are interrogating them and will soon find out the source and people involved in supplying that toxic lot of spirit,” said Mukesh Agarwal, Assam’s additional police chief.

 

The Oscars Are Only As Hellish As Everything Else Going On In America Right Now

$
0
0
Two years into a Donald Trump presidency that has left the country spiraling further and further into political chaos, the Oscars emerge leader-less and plagued by scandals ― a billion-dollar institution in crisis.

The last time the Oscars went without a host was 1989. The results were infamous. A helium-voiced Snow White opened the show in a flamboyant 11-minute musical ensemble that paired her with Merv Griffin and a tone-deaf Rob Lowe, fresh off making a sex tape that would turn into a scandal. The stars in the audience ― Michelle Pfeiffer, Tom Hanks, Sigourney Weaver ― couldn’t hide their grimaces. Later, 19 up-and-coming thespians, including Patrick Dempsey and Ricki Lake (?!), sang an original number about how great it would be to win an Academy Award; today, their collective nominations total zero.

A subsequent issue of the Los Angeles Times devoted its entire letters-to-the-editor page to hate mail criticizing the show. Daunted by the dent to its image, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, which presents the awards, assembled a panel to review what went wrong, responding to an open letter in which Julie Andrews, Paul Newman and 15 other Hollywood dignitaries labeled the ceremony “an embarrassment to both the Academy and the entire motion picture industry.” It was the unruly kickoff that did them in, the panel concluded. The next year, new producers were hired and Billy Crystal ushered in the golden age of Oscar hosts. 

Call it what you will, but we haven’t stopped talking about the debacle since. “Rob Lowe and Snow White” is an eternal pop culture punchline, enshrined in countless internet roundups ticking off history’sworstOscar moments. But it’s also the type of train wreck people secretly adore: a frivolous, baroque, self-referential whatsit. And so what did the academy opt to do this year, in the wake of an identity crisis that’s intensified by the day? Go without a host. 

Except “opt” isn’t the right word. The 54 members elected to the academy’s board of governors didn’t have much choice after once-scheduled host Kevin Hart failed to offer a satisfying apology for old homophobic tweets and standup material ― one of many controversies to plague the Oscars in the past seven months. No one else in town wanted the job; the six-figure paycheck (a paltry sum for multimillionaires), weekslong prep and unforgiving social media scrutiny have detracted from the glamour once associated with emceeing Hollywood’s biggest event. Instead, producers will recruit celebrities to do Meryl knows what. Sing Queen anthems? Roast all the foibles in a winky musical production? Knit?

Anyone who’s been paying attention to the decisions pouring out of the academy’s ranks in the past half-year might ask: Are the Oscars over?

Rob Lowe and Snow White, somehow not a hallucination but rather a shot from the 1989 Oscars.

Ninety-one years in, the Oscars just aren’t what they used to be, back when Bob Hope anchored 19 times, Crystal nine and Whoopi Goldberg four ― and back when it was common for more than 40 million viewers to tune in live. Compared to the 2018-19 awards season, 1989’s fiasco looks quaint.

Beyond the Hart flap, the academy’s desperate attempts to claw its way back into audiences’ good graces have only heightened agita. In an effort to juice ratings following last year’s record-low viewership (26.5 million), the board introduced a short-lived category meant to honor an “outstanding achievement in popular film,” whatever that means. And a short-lived choice to have only the two most famous Original Song nominees perform. (Lady Gaga quashed that one.) And a short-lived question about whether to flout tradition by asking super-renowned people like Oprah Winfrey to present the acting awards instead of last year’s winners. (Anyone who thinks Allison Janney isn’t super-famous is no friend of mine.) And a short-lived, much-derided move to present several less-starry categories during commercial breaks, part of an effort to cap the sometimes unwieldy telecast at three hours ― the shortest since 1973.

All of this arrives on the heels of 2016’s #OscarsSoWhite fallout, 2017’s Best Picture envelope snafu involving “Moonlight” and “La La Land,” and 2018’s hot-take opprobrium surrounding the racially misguided “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.” The drama is up, but the ratings are down. As the Oscars traverse their ninth decade, is anything going right? Why aren’t the professional storytellers who steer the academy better at uniting the American people who consume the culture they’re making? 

Warren Beatty clarifies the 2017 Best Picture flub while

The latter question is difficult to answer. Any metaphor linking ongoing Oscar turmoil to the American zeitgeist du jour is almost too obvious. Two years into a Donald Trump presidency that has left the country spiraling further and further into political chaos, the Oscars emerge leader-less and plagued by scandals ― a billion-dollar institution in crisis. As franchises and streaming services overcrowd the entertainment marketplace, moviegoing is less of a social unifier, and as a result, the Oscars can’t decide whether to be a tastemaker or a MAGA-esque populist interface. The harsh truth is that nothing on the aforementioned roster of bad ideas is likely to lure in constituents who weren’t already loyal to the academy’s annual Bacchanalia, aside from a few rubberneckers curious what all this frenzy will yield. 

For some, this might indeed signal a death knell for the Oscars, which are put on by an organization that, despite recent diversification initiatives, remains overwhelmingly male and even more overwhelmingly white. It doesn’t help that some of the movies in the running for prizes this year are caught in maelstroms too: The director of one Best Picture-nominated film (“Bohemian Rhapsody”) faces multiple sexual assault allegations while another Best Picture-nominated film (“Green Book”) has been the subject of heated debates concerning how Hollywood depicts racial progress

But I’m not convinced the Oscars are marching toward defeat. Sure, watching the academy fall on its ass like Wile E. Coyote tussling with the Road Runner is as delicious as it is disheartening. Schadenfreude, baby. But strip away whatever personal hang-ups you have about preserving (or ripping up) the Oscars’ customs, and awards season becomes a microcosm for everything going on in contemporary culture. It’s a platform for our national consciousness; embedded within the glitz are mini-audits of what’s happening in government, fashion, technology, social activism, corporate economics and popular entertainment. 

With “Roma,” the first streaming original nominated for Best Picture, we can gauge Netflix’s rapid ascendance from disruptor to pacesetter ― a transition that has shifted Hollywood’s economic foundation and uprooted the way we absorb culture. With “Black Panther,” we will see how a blockbuster starring a predominately black cast fares among voters two years after “Moonlight,” and whether the group is willing to embrace the comic book genre’s staggering market share. In “Green Book,” we realize how little the think-piece ecosystem resonates offline and how askew Hollywood can be when it comes to mainstream depictions of racial identity at a time when America is finally starting to reconcile with its own history. With “A Star Is Born,” a former front-runner that now feels like a second-tier contender in many categories, we get a sense of whether there’s still an appetite for old-fashioned, weepy crowd-pleasers in the vein of “Titanic” and “Terms of Endearment.”

All of that will get filtered into our living rooms, where things become personal. In the end, the ceremony has little to do with the notion of honoring the best movies ― a delusion that treats the Oscars as a meritocracy instead of what they really are: a hotbed for pompous, multimillion-dollar politicking ― and everything to do with just how much the trappings of this three- or four-hour television spectacle can double as an annual checkup for what’s happening in the real world. 

In stumbling over its attempts to restore relevancy, the academy unintentionally learned just how relevant it already is.

Whoopi Goldberg hosting the Oscars in 2002.

Considered in total, the Oscars aren’t facing extinction so much as weathering growing pains, just like they were in 1989. Ratings are dwindling because all network television ratings are dwindling, even for the Super Bowl, which reflects another wealthy institution facing sociopolitical dissension. Perhaps this year’s existential crunch is less about the twilight of award shows specifically and more about the final collapse of the monoculture. One-off moments no longer have the power to seize our shared consideration, so a staple like the Oscars loses some of its stronghold. But that, too, is a natural evolution; the very idea of what it takes to be a celebrity has shifted, and the Oscars are, blessedly, one of the few areas that shouldn’t have to recalibrate for that bleak transformation.

Nonetheless, the ceremony will have to change someday, in some fashion. That could mean a streaming service buys the broadcast rights after ABC’s contract expires in 2028, or voting and membership procedures shift to better represent how young audiences experience cinema. Like so much else, the Oscars are trying to find their way in an America that seems to care less and less about anything without a superhero or Snapchat filter at the center. It makes perfect, demented sense that it would try to dumb itself down instead of ask stakeholders to rise to the occasion. But the award-show fatigue the academy tried to combat over the past few months won’t be solved by bumping categories from the broadcast or telling Allison Janney to stay home. 

In a moment like this, you realize that everyone’s relationship with the Oscars is different. My therapist, like Gwyneth Paltrow, still hasn’t seen “The Favourite,” even though I told him it was my favorite movie of 2018. My mom, who lives in Louisiana, called her brother racist for refusing to see “Green Book,” and I didn’t have the heart to tell her she should pick a better scapegoat. A woman working at a coffee shop near where Sunday’s red carpet is being set up apparently didn’t even know which network to tune into. 

But the point is that almost everyone has some relationship. Everyone with a television or a laptop or an iPhone knows at least a little bit of what’s trickling out of the academy’s hive mind, regardless of whether they approve or whether they watch the awards. It seems practically predestined, in the year of our Relentless Lord 2019, that the Oscars would suddenly encounter a melee of bad PR, backward decision-making and corpulent controversies ― a mess befitting this overworked, beleaguered, easily distracted country.

We can (and should) turn a skeptical eye toward the Oscars, but we can’t deny that they hand society a mirror that reveals more than enough wrinkles. This isn’t the sort of attention the academy asked for, but it’s the attention they deserve. Somewhere, Snow White is vindicated.

Tina Fey, Amy Poehler And Maya Rudolph, The Hosts We Deserve, Open The Oscars

$
0
0

The 2019 Oscars kicked off without a host ... and then Tina Fey, Amy Poehler and Maya Rudolph walked on stage. 

After Adam Lambert and the original band members of Queen kicked off the show with a rock-heavy medley, the trio of comedians welcomed the crowd to the ceremony, insisting again and again they were not the hosts. 

 

The Academy announced earlier this month that the awards show would charge ahead without a host for the first time in 30 years after Kevin Hart exited over controversy regarding his old, homophobic tweets. 

Fey, Poehler and Rudolph went on to poke fun at the carousel of controversies that have surrounded the awards show this past year, including the much-derided popular film category.

“There is no host tonight. There won’t be a popular movie category, and Mexico is not paying for the wall,” Rudolph joked. 

The mere presence of the beloved “Saturday Night Live” trio sent Twitter into a frenzy, with many fans watching along clamoring for them to host for real. 

The actresses then transitioned out of their non-hosting schtick and went on to present the Best Supporting Actress award to Regina King for her work in “If Beale Street Could Talk.” 

'Black Panther' Designer Becomes First Black Woman To Win Costume Design Oscar

$
0
0

This Oscar win will go down in the history books. 

Ruth Carter of “Black Panther” took home the Academy Award for best costume design. The accolade makes Carter, already a well-established figure in the business, the first black woman to win an Oscar in that category. 

Carter beat out Alexandra Byrne of “Mary Queen of Scots,” and Mary Zophres of “The Ballad of Buster Scruggs.” She also won over Sandy Powell, a three-time Oscar winner who was nominated for both “Mary Poppins Returns” and “The Favourite” this year. 

The actress thanked her mentor Spike Lee during her acceptance speech and spoke on how costume elevated the Black Panther superhero. 

“Marvel may have created the first black superhero, but through costume design, we turned him into an African king,” she said. 

While “Black Panther” marked Carter’s first Oscar nomination and win, she’s long cemented herself as a force in the industry, designing for characters in culturally impactful films on the black experience including “Selma,” “Love and Basketball,” and “Malcom X.” She’s also known for her frequent collaborations with  Lee, working on 12 films with the director. 

She told CNN that the diverse Afrofuturist aesthetic reflected in Wakanda’s natives was meant to disrupt the idea that African culture is monolithic. 

“I thought this has got to be an important film, and it had to be something that was Afrofuturist. ... I would have to represent images of beauty, forms of beauty, from the African tribal traditions, so that African-Americans could understand it; so that (non-black) Americans could understand African-Americans better; so we could start erasing a homogenized version of Africa,” she said. 

To do so, she drew inspiration from across the continent. For instances, the 3D-printed crown worn by the Angela Bassett-depicted Queen Ramonda is a nod to the Zulu married woman’s hat and the metal neck rings worn by Okoye, played by Danai Gurira, references rings worn by Southern African tribe Ndebele, CNN reported. 

Carter’s involvement in “Black Panther” ― a film lauded as a win for black representation in a white-dominated Hollywood ― is not so surprising given her aim to uplift those in her community. She told The Day that in her work with Lee and the director’s production company, 40 Acres and a Mule, her aim has been to “push the Afro future and African diaspora.”

“We considered ourselves positive role models in the film industry,” she told the outlet. “There were always internships at 40 Acres and a Mule where we were teaching younger people who didn’t have an inroad to the film industry, exposing so many people to the industry including myself. Because of that, I give back as much as I can.”

Oscars 2019 Red Carpet: All The Academy Awards Snaps You Need To See

$
0
0

When it comes to red carpets, they don’t come much bigger than Oscars, and this year’s event was as star-studded as ever.

With this year’s nominated actresses including the likes of Lady Gaga, Glenn Close, Emma Stone and Regina King, glamour was pretty much guaranteed, and there were red carpet moments aplenty.

It was also great to see first-timers like the cast of Roma – including Best Actress contender Yalitza Aparicio – and our very own Olivia Colman, also recognised for her work in The Favourite, hitting the Oscars red carpet for the very first time.

Lady Gaga, Olivia Colman and Regina King

And while the men of Hollywood are often derided for playing it safe when it comes to their fashion at events like the Academy Awards, we were happy to see a fair few taking fashion risks.

Among our faves were Black Panther star Chadwick Boseman, who glittered his way down the red carpet, Best Director nominee Spike Lee’s homage to Prince.

Chadwick Boseman

The night not having an actual host, there were also more A-list guest presenters brought in to present, who also made a splash as they posed for photographers on their way into the event. Jennifer Lopez was serving usual J-Lo red carpet glamour, Crazy Rich Asians star Awkwafina’s pantsuit was a real stand-out while, fresh from his cape-swishing turn at the Golden Globes, we could not get enough of Pose actor Billy Porter’s tuxedo and gown combo. 

Billy Porter

But listen, you don’t want to sit and read about it, you want pictures, and we have got you covered on that front.

Here are all the red carpet snaps you need to see from this year’s Oscars...


Marie Kondo Sparks Joy As She Attends Oscars For The Very First Time

$
0
0

Lifestyle and organizational expert Marie Kondo seems like she’s been everywhere this year — and now that includes the Oscars.

The star of Netflix’s “Tidying Up with Marie Kondo” walked the red carpet at the 91st Academy Awards on Sunday, sporting a look that certainly sparks joy.

Kondo wore a pink gown with sequined flowers and lace embellishments by Jenny Packham.

The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up author was invited by entertainment news show Access to attend the award show for the very first time and will mingle with nominees on the red carpet with the show. Access also helped Kondo pick the perfect dress for the night in a segment that included a surprise appearance by Olympic figure skater Adam Rippon.

Kondo wore a pink gown with sequined flowers and a small train. While picking out the delicate number by Jenny Packham with style expert Kit Hoover, Kondo called the gown, “So cute.”

Well, if “cute” was the look she was going for, she nailed it.

The lifestyle expert seemed to be having a blast on her first Oscars red carpet.

Oscars 2019: Here Are All The Academy Award Winners

$
0
0

The Oscars have come and gone, but rarely have they been this messy.

The 91st annual Academy Awards kicked off on Sunday night at the Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles down a host, without a popular film category ― that’s mercifully been shelved until 2020 ― and under stricter time constraints after a chaotic and troubled buildup to awards season’s most-esteemed ceremony. 

Ahead of the show, producers promised this year’s Oscars are in “good shape” with a greater focus on star-studded performances ― all the nominees for Original Song will be showcased at the ceremony in some fashion ― and hopefully history-making speeches. 

The Academy Awards could do just that if Alfonso Cuarón’s Netflix film “Roma,” which leads the nominations with 10 nods across major categories, wins big and scores the streaming service its first Best Picture victory.

The raucous royal comedy “The Favourite” is also up for 10 nominations, but seems increasingly unlikely to triumph given a spotty awards season record so far. 

Marvel’s box-office behemoth “Black Panther” could provide a surprise upset in the Best Picture category, however, after a fiercely fought Oscar campaign and nearly universal praise. 

Glenn Close and Lady Gaga loom large in the Actress In A Leading Role category ― the two even tied at the Critics’ Choice Awards in January ― while Rami Malek and Christian Bale are leading the race for the Actor In A Leading Role trophy after their transformative performances in “Bohemian Rhapsody” and “Vice,” respectively.

Check out the list of nominees and winners below. 

 

Best Picture

“Black Panther” 

“A Star Is Born” 

“Roma”

“The Favourite”

“Vice”

“Bohemian Rhapsody”

WINNER “Green Book”

“BlacKkKlansman”

 

Actress In A Leading Role

Glenn Close, “The Wife”

Lady Gaga, “A Star Is Born” 

Yalitza Aparicio, “Roma”

WINNER Olivia Colman, “The Favourite”

Melissa McCarthy, “Can You Ever Forgive Me?”

 

Actor In A Leading Role

Christian Bale, “Vice”

Bradley Cooper, “A Star Is Born”

Viggo Mortensen, “Green Book” 

Willem Dafoe, “At Eternity’s Gate”

WINNER Rami Malek, “Bohemian Rhapsody”

 

Actress In A Supporting Role

Amy Adams, “Vice”

Marina de Tavira, “Roma”

WINNER: Regina King, “If Beale Street Could Talk” 

Emma Stone, “The Favourite” 

Rachel Weisz, “The Favourite” 

 

Actor In A Supporting Role

Mahershala Ali, “Green Book”

Adam Driver, “BlacKkKlansman”

Sam Elliott, “A Star Is Born”

Richard E. Grant, “Can You Ever Forgive Me?”

Sam Rockwell, “Vice”

 

Directing

Spike Lee, “BlacKkKlansman”

Pawel Pawlikowski, “Cold War”

Yorgos Lanthimos, “The Favourite” 

Alfonso Cuarón, “Roma”

Adam McKay, “Vice”

 

Writing (Original Screenplay)

“First Reformed”

“Green Book”

WINNER “Roma”

“The Favourite”

“Vice”  

 

Writing (Adapted Screenplay)

“The Ballad of Buster Scruggs”

WINNER “BlacKkKlansman”

“Can You Ever Forgive Me?”

“If Beale Street Could Talk”

“A Star Is Born”

 

Cinematography

“Cold War”

“The Favourite”

“Never Look Away”

WINNER: “Roma”

“A Star Is Born” 

 

Animated Feature Film

“Incredibles 2” 

WINNER “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse”

“Mirai”

“Ralph Breaks the Internet”

“Isle of Dogs”

 

Short Film (Animated)

“Animal Behaviour”

WINNER “Bao

“Late Afternoon”

“One Small Step”

“Weekends”

 

Short Film (Live Action)

“Detainment”

“Fauve”

“Marguerite”

“Mother”

WINNER “Skin”

 

Foreign Language Film

“Capernaum”

“Cold War” 

“Never Look Away”

WINNER: “Roma”

“Shoplifters”

 

Documentary (Feature)

WINNER: “Free Solo” 

“Minding the Gap” 

“Of Fathers and Sons” 

“RBG”

Hale County This Morning, This Evening”

 

Documentary (Short Subject)

“Black Sheep”

“End Game”

“Lifeboat”

“A Night at the Garden”

WINNER “Period. End of Sentence.”

 

Production Design

WINNER: “Black Panther”

“First Man”

“The Favourite” 

“Mary Poppins Returns” 

“Roma” 

  

Film Editing

“BlacKkKlansman”

WINNER “Bohemian Rhapsody”

“Green Book”

“The Favourite”

“Vice” 

 

Sound Editing

“A Quiet Place”

“Black Panther”

WINNER: “Bohemian Rhapsody”

“First Man”

“Roma”

 

Sound Mixing

“Black Panther”

WINNER: “Bohemian Rhapsody”

“First Man”

“Roma”

“A Star Is Born”

 

Music (Original Score)

WINNER “Black Panther”

“BlacKkKlansman”

“If Beale Street Could Talk”

“Isle of Dogs”

“Mary Poppins Returns”

 

Music (Original Song)

“All the Stars” ― “Black Panther”

“I’ll Fight” ― “RBG”

WINNER “Shallow” ― “A Star Is Born”

“The Place Where Lost Things Go” ― “Mary Poppins Returns”

“When a Cowboy Trades His Spurs for Wings” ― “The Ballad of Buster Scruggs”

 

Costume Design

“The Ballad of Buster Scruggs”

WINNER: “Black Panther”

“The Favourite”

“Mary Poppins Returns”

“Mary Queen of Scots”

 

Makeup And Hairstyling

“Border”

“Mary Queen of Scots”

WINNER: “Vice”

 

Visual Effects

“Avengers: Infinity War”

“Christopher Robin”

“First Man”

“Ready Player One”

“Solo: A Star Wars Story”

 

 
 
 
 

Mahershala Ali Wins Best Supporting Actor Oscar For ‘Green Book’

$
0
0

Wherever Mahershala Ali stores all of his acting awards — which already includes an Oscar (for “Moonlight”), Golden Globe (“Green Book”) and BAFTA (“Green Book”) — just got a little more cramped.

The 45-year-old “True Detective” star won his second Oscar for Best Supporting Actor for his portrayal Dr. Don Shirley in “Green Book” at the 91st Academy Awards Sunday night.

“Trying to capture Dr. Shirley’s essence pushed me to my end,” Ali said while receiving his award.

Mahershala Ali accepts Best Actor in a Supporting Role award for

He also dedicated his award to someone very special in his life. 

“I want to dedicate this to my grandmother, who has been in my ear my entire life telling me that if at first I don’t succeed, try, try again,” Ali said. 

“Green Book” follows the true-life story of the budding friendship between jazz pianist Don Shirley (Ali) and Tony “Lip” Vallelonga (Viggo Mortensen) after Shirley hires Vallelonga to act as a driver and bodyguard as he embarks on a musical tour of the Jim Crow South in the early 1960s.

Viggo Mortensen and Mahershala Ali in

The film was co-written by Tony Lip’s son Nick Vallelonga, who based the screenplay on his father’s recollections of the road trip. Though “Green Book” has been embraced by some audiences and is an awards season darling, controversy has swirled around the movie since its November premiere last year.

In November, two relatives of Shirley — the pianist’s 82-year-old brother Maurice Shirley and nephew Edwin Shirley III — told NPR’s 1A Movie Club that the film is brimming with inaccuracies. Maurice went as far as to describe it as “a symphony of lies” to Shadow and Act.

Upon hearing their comments on NPR, Ali reportedly called both Maurice and Edwin the same day the episode aired.

“What he said was, ’If I have offended you, I am so, so terribly sorry,” Edwin told Shadow and Act. “’I did the best I could with the material I had. I was not aware that there were close relatives with whom I could have consulted to add some nuance to the character.’”

A rep for Ali told HuffPost that the actor was not apologizing “for the film” itself at the time, but gave no further details about his apology.

Yet there was also plenty of criticism from those who say the feel-good movie meant to pull at the heartstrings oversimplifies decades of racial dynamics in the United States — especially in scenes in which Tony Lip introduces Shirley to Little Richard and fried chicken, or saves Shirley from multiple racist incidents.

The scene in which Tony Lip introduces Shirley to fried chicken.

“There’s not much here you haven’t seen before, and very little that can’t be described as crude, obvious and borderline offensive, even as it tries to be uplifting and affirmative,” The New York Times’ A.O. Scott wrote.

HuffPost’s Zeba Blay felt the movie was simply boring.

“I guess, in order to accept this movie as a crowd-pleaser, one must consider which crowds it’s pleasing,” she said in December. “I think the things that make this movie ‘feel good’ are, quite frankly, the things that make people feel good about not being aggressively racist. And that, to me, is the most boring thing of all.”

Adam Lambert Opens Host-Less Oscars With Killer Queen Performance

$
0
0

Adam Lambert and Queen got the 2019 Oscars off to a nontraditional start Sunday with a dynamite performance. 

Not surprisingly, Lambert proved himself to be a capable frontman, leading original Queen members Brian May and Roger Taylor through rollicking versions of “We Will Rock You” and “We Are The Champions.”  

The choice of Queen to open the 2019 ceremony was a fitting one ― the legendary rock band’s rise was brought to the big screen last year in “Bohemian Rhapsody,” up for five Oscars.  

Adam Lambert opened the 2019 Academy Awards with a medley of “We Will Rock You” and “We Are The Champions

Released last fall, “Bohemian Rhapsody” overcame mixedreviews to emerge as an awards season favorite. Rami Malek’s performance as Queen’s eccentric frontman, Freddie Mercury, has already received a Golden Globe and is considered an Oscars front-runner for Best Actor. 

Speculation as to how producers would handle the host-less 2019 ceremony has been rampant in the weeks since actor-comedian Kevin Hart announced he was stepping down as the evening’s host. Hart’s resignation came amid controversy over his previous use of homophobic jokes on Twitter and in his comedy routines.  

Meanwhile, Sunday’s performance signaled the start of a new era for Lambert. The “American Idol” veteran, who has been collaborating with Queen since 2011, released “Feel Something,” his first new single in nearly two years, last week. 

He credited his work with Queen as giving him “positive energy” during a “dark period” of self-doubt that preceded his fourth album, slated for release later this year. 

“The fans we perform for are so full of love, and Brian May and Roger Taylor are a joy to play music with and always remind me of my value,” he wrote on Twitter and Instagram. “Together we have collaborated creatively on our tours and this has helped me to reaffirm my confidence in my artistry.”  

Give Peace A Chance, Imran Khan Urges Modi While Asking For 'Actionable Intelligence' On Pulwama Attack

$
0
0

ISLAMABAD — Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan on Sunday asked his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi to “give peace a chance” and assured him that he “stands by” his words and will “immediately act” if New Delhi provides Islamabad with “actionable intelligence” on the Pulwama attack.

Khan’s remarks came a day after Modi in a rally in Rajasthan said, “There is consensus in the entire world against terrorism. We are moving ahead with strength to punish the perpetrators of terrorism...The scores will be settled this time, settled for good...This is a changed India, this pain will not be tolerated...We know how to crush terrorism.” 

Recalling his conversation with Khan during a congratulatory call after he became Pakistan’s premier, Modi said he told him “let us fight against poverty and illiteracy” and Khan gave his word - saying he is a Pathan’s son - but went back on it.

A statement released by the Pakistan Prime Minister’s Office said, “PM Imran Khan stand by his words that if India gives us actionable intelligence, we will immediately act.” 

PM Modi should “give peace a chance”, Khan said in the statement.  

Earlier on February 19 also, Khan assured India that he would act against the perpetrators of the deadly Pulwama terror attack, carried out by Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) terror group, if it shares “actionable intelligence” with Islamabad, but warned New Delhi against launching any “revenge” retaliatory action.

India said Khan’s offer to investigate the attack if provided proof is a “lame excuse”.

“It is a well-known fact that Jaish-e-Mohammad and its leader Masood Azhar are based in Pakistan. These should be sufficient proof for Pakistan to take action,” the Ministry of External Affairs said.

“The Prime Minister of Pakistan has offered to investigate the matter if India provides proof. This is a lame excuse. In the horrific attack in Mumbai on 26/11, proof was provided to Pakistan. Despite this, the case has not progressed for the last more than 10 years. Likewise, on the terror attack on Pathankot airbase, there has been no progress. Promises of ‘guaranteed action’ ring hollow given the track record of Pakistan,” it said.

Khan said during his meeting with Modi in December 2015, “we had agreed that since poverty alleviation is a priority for our region, we would not allow any terrorist incident to derail peace efforts, however, long before Pulwama, these efforts were derailed in September 2018”.

The Pakistani premier was referring to India calling off the foreign minister-level talks with Pakistan in New York on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in September last year after following the “brutal” killing of three BSF jawans by Pakistani soldiers in Jammu and Kashmir as well as the release of postal stamps “glorifying” Kashmiri militant Burhan Wani by the Pakistan government.

Viewing all 46147 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>