Quantcast
Channel: Huffington Post India
Viewing all 46147 articles
Browse latest View live

Return As Soon As Possible, Govt Tells Tourists And Amarnath Yatris

$
0
0
Government forces stand guard as people make their pilgrimage to the Amarnath shrine, on July 1, 2019, in Baltal.

SRINAGAR— The Jammu and Kashmir government on Friday asked Amarnath Yatris and tourists to immediately make necessary arrangements to cut short their stay in the Valley and return as soon as possible in the wake of intelligence inputs of “specific terror threats” to the pilgrimage.

The Principal Secretary (Home) issued a security advisory, saying pilgrims and tourists “may curtail their stay” and “return as soon as possible”.

“Keeping in view the latest intelligence inputs of terror threats, with specific targeting of the Amarnath Yatra, and given the prevailing security situation in the Kashmir Valley, in the interest of safety and security of the tourists and Amarnath Yatris, it is advised that they may curtail their stay in the Valley immediately and take necessary measures to return as soon as possible,” it said.


What Is Article 35A And What Is The Controversy Around It?

$
0
0

Article 35A of the Constitution has been in the news intermittently since the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) promised to annul the provision in the party manifesto for 2019 Lok Sabha polls

The centre’s order of deployment of additional 100 companies of CAPFs in Jammu and Kashmir on 26 July has reportedly sparked panic in the Valley about the abrogation of Article 35A. 

There has been severe backlash from political parties in Kashmir, with former chief minister Mehbooba Mufti saying any tinkering with the state’s special status or identity would be akin to setting a powder keg on fire.

For the latest news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

People’s Conference chairman Sajjad Gani Lone, according to PTI, also said the rumours of tinkering with Article 35A were spreading fast and there is no reaction from the state or the Central governments.

What exactly is Article 35A?

Article 35A of the Constitution gives special rights to the residents of Jammu and Kashmir. The provision bars people from outside the state from acquiring any immovable property in the state. 

Article 35A was added to Article 370 by a 1954 Presidential order. 

It also gives the Jammu and Kashmir legislature power to decide who all are ‘permanent residents’ of the state and confer on them special rights and privileges, according to The Hindu.

It also denies property rights to a woman who marries a person from outside the state.

What are the arguments against it?

There are presently seven petitions pending in the Supreme Court against Article 35A, according to The Indian Express. One was filed by an NGO, We the Citizens, and argues that the provision is against the “very spirit of oneness of India” as it creates a “class within a class of Indian citizens”, according to Business Standard.

BJP has denounced the way the provision was included in the constitution. Senior BJP leader and former finance minister Arun Jaitley had said it was “surreptitiously” included by a presidential notification in the Constitution in 1954.

Article 35A, he said, was neither a part of the original Constitution framed by the Constituent Assembly, nor did it come as a Constitutional Amendment under Article 368 of the Constitution which requires an approval by two-third majority of both Houses of Parliament. 

What has the BJP said?

In its manifesto for the 2019 general election, BJP said it is committed to annulling Article 35A as “the provision is discriminatory against non-permanent residents and women of Jammu and Kashmir”.

“We believe that Article 35A is an obstacle in the development of the state. We will take all steps to ensure a safe and peaceful environment for all residents of the state.”  

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in an interview to CNN-News18, also said, “The situation in Kashmir is such that people want change, whether it is about Article 35A or 370.” 

Union Minister Amit Shah has also said that the party will scrap Article 370 and 35A as soon as it gets majority in the Rajya Sabha. “Removing Article 35A has been in our manifesto since 1950, it is our commitment to the people of the country,” he said in conversation with News18’s Rahul Joshi in March, when he was president of the BJP.

With a resounding majority in the Lok Sabha and Shah as the Home Minister, there has been speculation that the BJP can now carry out some of its more controversial plans.

What has the opposition said?

Both the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and National Conference have warned the Centre against scrapping Article 35A. Farooq Abdullah has said that both Article 35A and 370 were the foundation for Kashmir and should not be removed.

Mufti also warned the BJP not to “play with fire” when it comes to special status of Jammu and Kashmir. “If any hand tries to touch Article 35A, not only that hand, but that whole body will be burnt to ashes,” she said. 

(With PTI inputs)

'Modern Family' Stars Recreate Original Cast Photo 10 Years On

$
0
0

The stars of “Modern Family” marked a poignant moment in the award-winning sitcom’s history by recreating one of their earliest cast photos.

“From the first table read 10 years ago to the last first table read,” ABC captioned an Instagram post featuring both pictures this week:

Actor Nolan Gould, who plays Luke Dunphy in the hit show, also shared the photos online. “Spot the differences,” he wrote, adding: “Excited to be spending one more season with the best TV family and crew.”

Jesse Tyler Ferguson (a.k.a. Mitchell Pritchett) shared the new cast get-together from a different angle. “I love this cast and crew so much,” he said.

ABC announced in February that the show’s 11th season would be its last.

It premieres on ABC on Sept. 25.

This Tiny Puppy's 'Mustache' Is Probably Better Than Yours

$
0
0

Salvador Dolly the rescue pup is stealing hearts and putting men to shame across the nation with her striking curly “mustache.”

The 5-week-old cutie was born with a black strip of fur above her top lip, bearing resemblance to Spanish artist Salvador Dali and his impressive ’stache, and possibly landing her amongst the likes of Tom Selleck, Ron Burgundy and Hulk Hogan in the mustache hall of fame.

The genetically blessed pup and her 10 siblings are in foster care and looking for forever homes after they were taken in by Hearts and Bones Rescue in Dallas.

Amazon India’s Cheap PS4 Games May Cost You Dearly

$
0
0

Third-party sellers on Amazon India’s marketplace are selling PlayStation Network (PSN) accounts for use on PS4 consoles. What this means is, you can play a host of games ranging from SekiroJump Force, and Gran Turismo Sport for a fraction of the cost of a digital copy via the PS Store or a disc variant.

How this works is, the seller would give you the PSN credentials of an account that has the game you want to buy which you can then add to your PS4. On downloading it, you can play it on your own PSN ID.

For the latest news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

“Providing you a digital content with a global PSN ID which will be logged in and your purchase will be downloaded/linked with your own PSN ID,” reads the description for these listings.

While that may be enough for some, it comes with a massive caveat: the sale of PSN accounts is against Sony’s terms of service. This could result in your console being banned from PSN.

What’s more is, multiple reports indicate that these accounts are usually acquired by means that are not entirely legal. All of this makes it a situation where if it’s too good to be true, it probably is. We’ve reached out to Amazon for comment and will update this story if we hear from the company.

It doesn’t help matters that these sellers are given top billing and visibility on Amazon India. Searching for most PS4 games shows up the option to buy an account which has it. In addition to the aforementioned titles, a quick search indicates Red Dead Redemption 2 and Spider-Man are just some of the games that can be played via means that are far from legitimate.

This also begs the question? Does Amazon India actually have any safeguards in place to prevent these sellers or vet the items that are up for sale? When the e-commerce giant launched in India, teething problems like pirated PC copies of Watch Dogs reared their ugly head on occasion.

But with Amazon India distributing peripherals from the likes of Nacon and at one time, was the sole official retail partner for the Xbox One and EA’s games, allowing the sale of PSN accounts makes it far from safe for average consumers, particularly those looking for a deal.

The Mako Reactor is your one-stop destination for everything Japanese gaming in India. 

 

'13 Reasons Why' Goes Full 'Riverdale' In Twisty Season 3 Trailer

$
0
0

Netflix’s “13 Reasons Why” has apparently started sampling the jingle-jangle supply over at “Riverdale,” because the official trailer for the upcoming third season is taking the show in a decidedly soapier direction. 

What began as a series unflinchingly portraying issues that plague many teens like self-harm and suicide has now become a full-blown CW-esque whodunnit, as the first look at the new season thrusts the students of Liberty High School into a murder mystery. 

Arriving Aug. 23 on the streaming service, the next chapter will revolve around the question of who killed high school football star and serial rapist Bryce Walker ― previously seen very much alive at the end of Season 2. 

In the trailer, returning faces ― including Dylan Minnette, Brandon Flynn and Aisha Boe ― stand over a casket, as Walker’s mother, played “Desperate Housewives” alum Brenda Strong, begs them to help find who killed her son. 

Per Entertainment Weekly on the new season and the show’s various characters: “Eight months after preventing Tyler from committing an unthinkable act at Spring Fling, Clay, Tony, Jessica, Alex, Justin, and Zach find ways to shoulder the burden of the cover-up together while helping Tyler move toward recovery. But when the aftermath of a tumultuous Homecoming game culminates in the disappearance of a football player, and Clay finds himself under police scrutiny, it’s up to a shrewd outsider to steer the group through an investigation that threatens to lay bare everyone’s deepest secrets. The stakes are raised in this riveting third season of ‘13 Reasons Why’ as the consequences of even the most well-intended actions can alter a life forever.”

The series creators have recently taken action in response to criticism of the graphic scene that depicted the suicide of Hannah (Katherine Langford), whose death was the central plot point in Season 1. On the advice of medical experts, Netflix announced last month that the scene had been edited after studies revealed the show has been linked to a rise in suicide rates among teens.

“We’ve heard from many young people that ‘13 Reasons Why’ encouraged them to start conversations about difficult issues like depression and suicide and get help — often for the first time,” Netflix said in a statement. “As we prepare to launch Season Three later this summer, we’ve been mindful about the ongoing debate around the show. So on the advice of medical experts, including Dr. Christine Moutier, chief medical officer at the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, we’ve decided with creator Brian Yorkey and the producers of ‘13 Reasons Why’ to edit the scene in which Hannah takes her own life from Season 1.”

The series has already been renewed for a fourth and final season, which will reportedly chronicle the cast’s senior year, as they prepare to embark on their hopefully much less eventful college years. 

Is Sourav Ganguly Interested In Becoming India's Cricket Coach? He Responds

$
0
0

KOLKATA — Former skipper Sourav Ganguly on Friday said he aspires to be India’s cricket coach some time in future but has no interest in the high-profile position at this point.

The hunt is on for the new India coach with incumbent Ravi Shastri’s tenure coming to an end with the conclusion of the tour of the West Indies.

Ganguly said he’s definitely interested in the India coach’s job but not at the moment as his plate is full.

“Definitely, I’m interested but not at this point of time. Let one more phase go then I will throw my name into the fray,” Ganguly said.

For the latest news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

The 47-year-old is currently the Cricket Association of Bengal (CAB) president, besides being associated with IPL franchise Delhi Capitals as the team Advisor. He also does cricket commentary and is the host of a popular Bengali quiz show.

“Currently, I’m associated with too many things — IPL, CAB, TV commentary. Let me complete this. But I will definitely put my hat at some stage. Provided I get selected. But definitely I’m interested. Not now but in the future,” Ganguly said after unveiling a new range of men’s collections by Senco Gold & Diamonds.

One of the most successful Indian cricket captains, Ganguly was the chairman of the previous Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC), which picked Shastri as the India coach last time.

The recently-appointed CAC, led by Kapil Dev with Anshuman Gaekwad and Shanta Rangaswamy as other members, is all set to pick the new coach.

But it seems that Shastri, who has reapplied for the post, would get another term with the India captain Virat Kohli openly endorsing his candidature.

Kapil Dev also said that the skipper’s opinion needs to be “respected”.

Ganguly said there were not many big names in the fray this time around.

“Going by the applicants, I don’t see any heavyweight names. I heard Mahela (Jayawardene) would apply but ultimately he didn’t. There are not many big names who have applied for the coach’s job.

“Ultimately I don’t know what the panel will decide. They have been around for a while. We will see how long the term the coach will give. Not many names have applied for.”

The former left-hander however refused to comment on Shastri’s tenure.

“I will hold my opinion on that. I don’t think it’s right for me to say about that. I’m too far from the system that decides the coach,” Ganguly said.

After the ODI World Cup, where India lost in the semifinals, they will be back on the road with a full series in the West Indies, beginning with the first T20I in Florida on Saturday.

Ganguly, meanwhile, said India’s upcoming series would be tough against the reigning World T20 champions, who also defeated England 2-1 earlier this year at home.

“West Indies in West Indies will be a lot stronger. T20 is their preferred format. They enjoy playing T20s and they are the current World T20 champions. The two matches in Florida will be tough games. 

“Test matches will also be tough as they played very well against England. It won’t be an easy West Indies tour as it was five years ago. India will be challenged. There are a lot of young players in the team,” Ganguly said.

“As I’ve said before you want to see these young players get consistent opportunities. You keep saying horses for courses but I feel ‘don’t judge a horse if you want to keep them on the course’. Consistency is important for rhythm and confidence,” he added.

Ganguly heaped praise on Steve Smith whose brilliant century helped Australia recover from 122/8 to reach a competitive 284 in the opening Ashes Test.

“Class is permanent and you could see it. These sort of hundreds will remain in everybody’s memories. Now they have a big chance of winning the match. First innings scores are very important. From that point of view, it’s a fantastic hundred.

“To be away for a year and play the World Cup...he has had a quiet World Cup. And then to start the Ashes with a century, especially when the team was down was a remarkable effort. Ashes is the biggest England-Australia battle,” Ganguly said.

Can Board Games Help Young Indians Engage With Politics?

$
0
0

BENGALURU, Karnataka—Indians have just about finished processing the results of the mammoth general elections that concluded a couple of months ago. But election or no election, politics is never far from our mind. 

At least, that’s what the makers of a number of board games centred around the elections, that have launched recently or are set to launch, are counting on.

Leading the charge is the Kickstarter-funded Shasn, which opened for pre-orders a couple of weeks ago. In less than a day, it had hit its funding goal of $25,000 (around Rs 17 lakh) and at the time of writing, was at almost $115,000 (almost Rs Rs 80 lakh), with the campaign set to continue until August 17.

The team behind Shasn, Memesys, also made the documentary An Insignificant Man, about Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal. Speaking to The Hindu, Anand Gandhi—who co-produced the documentary—said the game is meant to get people to think about how the elections work.

For the latest news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

“It is a policy-thinking game, and focuses on the larger political framework and democratic procedure,” he said.

While many older Indians may still associate board games with children’s toys, there is now a burgeoning market for games aimed at adults, especially those who want to relax away from screens with their friends and family. There is also a growing number of people who are tired of the nightly shouting matches on news channels, and yet want to think about and engage with politics.

Learning about politics from games

While Shasn and its Kickstarter are getting a lot of attention now, it’s not the first election-related board game to try and woo users. A few months before the Lok Sabha elections, The Poll, a board game designed by journalist Abeer Kapoor was launched in India. 

At one level, both games seem similar. You’re competing for votes and you start off trying to stay true to the political ideals you’re standing for in the game. But then you quickly descend into realpolitik, unleashing booth-capturing and fake news, gerrymandering and managing the media while spending money to influence the results.

The Poll, however, is meant to be more educational. HuffPost India caught up with Kapoor briefly in Delhi, and we played the game to understand how it works. The goal of creating The Poll, he explained, was not just to make a game around the elections, but to make young people talk about the way politics operates in India, and to help people develop a framework in which to think about politics.

The resulting game can sometimes feel overwhelming—despite having carefully read through the instructions, it was very helpful to have Kapoor walk us through the game. The good news is that the team has also put together a YouTube channel, which includes a tutorial on how to play it.

In The Poll, you're competing for constituencies based on the issues people face there.

In the game, each player takes control of a fictional political party. You have to manage its finances, policy decisions and design a manifesto with which to contest the elections. You’ll be playing against up to three other players, and will have to make arguments to convince them that your manifesto is most aligned with the issues of the different constituencies, which could range from delays in trains to communal violence.

As the game progresses, you’ll find yourself running short on funds, and having to trade your policies for some corporate backing, which can be used to control the media, or launch a booth-capturing campaign.

Since the goal is to teach young people about politics, Kapoor has been touring the country, visiting small towns and hosting sessions for students. He said that he observed trends in the way people in different parts of the country were playing.

“In UP and Bihar, the voting [in the game] is completely transactional,” he said. “In Maharashtra the game was played in a much more deliberative and argumentative manner, whereas in Trichy, the boys weren’t so much into it, but the women really got into the game, and were holding serious talks.

“The idea is to help people build a vocabulary of policy, and it emerged from my work as a journalist. I wanted to make this as a board game because games have retention,” he added.

Your manifesto is made up from different cards that speak to specific issues, and these are how you win votes in constituencies.

Kapoor and his team did a lot of research and testing to develop the interlinking systems, and then did a limited print run. 

“The next step is to print it in Hindi, and then we’ll take it to small towns to play the game with grassroots activists,” he said.

One of the reasons why The Poll is touring the country is because, at a selling price of Rs 2,000, the game is out of the price range for many people. Although that price is low compared with most new popular board games, it’s still high for a country used to Scrabble and Monopoly.

Kapoor admitted that this is a limiting factor, and said that he’s looking at different ways in which the price can be brought down. One possibility could be a print-and-play version, where you download the cards as PDFs and print them out; or a freemium model that includes a stripped-down version of the game at a lower price.

Turning politics into a game

Shasn, which has already raised four times more than what the creators asked for on Kickstarter, is an even more expensive game. The game will be sold for $80 (approximately Rs 5,500), and while the Kickstarter edition offers a slight discount, it will also set you back $59 (approximately Rs 4,000). 

Although many people have backed this edition, which includes a single campaign (India or US elections), the biggest number of supporters is for the ‘Presidential Edition’ which, at $120 (approximately Rs 8,200) gets you all four campaigns—USA, India, Earth 2040 and Rome 40BCE.

Although the city with the most backers is Mumbai (68), followed by Bengaluru (28), overall, orders from the US hugely eclipse India, perhaps a result of Shasn’s pricing. The US has 650 orders, while India has 185, and then Canada and the UK both have 73 each. So it’s not surprising that Shasn’s makers are taking it to Gen Con, the biggest tabletop gaming convention in the US, from August 1 to August 4.

Shasn is much more ‘gamelike’ effort — although the game is thematically about politics, it is defined by the various systems of play. You might choose to develop your character as a capitalist or a strongman, but that’s driven by strategic choices in the game.

At the start of each turn, you answer a question related to politics, and your answer determines your ideology, and which resources you get that turn. You can then use those resources to buy votes, or conspiracy cards that can influence seats.

Along the way, you see how trying to win certain resources — from money to the media support — will require giving up your ideology, and you’ll also learn to make compromises and trade your ideology for votes, but unlike The Poll, where the experience is more focused on making players talk about real issues, here the idea is to get them to scheme.

You can spend money, build up trust and influence the media in order to win over voters, and capture areas on the board. It’s also possible to gerrymander in order to win a majority despite not having the votes.

The game-like aspects of Shasn are much more straightforward than The Poll, resulting in a fun and fast-paced game.

There’s scope for cooperating with other players, backstabbing them, and scheming your way to the top—the ‘game’ focus is clearer here than with The Poll. Across ten rounds, you’ll gain control of territory, and whichever player has the most majority votes at the end wins. The result is a fast paced, strategic game that’s a lot of fun, but because of its pricing, might not reach too many players.

’Trump’ing everything

Apart from The Poll and Shasn, another interesting new game is Mantri Cards, which is also being crowdfunded on Wishberry. At the time of writing, there are two weeks left for the campaign—which has raised Rs 2.2 lakh out of its target of Rs 4 lakh—to end.

Mantri Cards are like the trump cards that we’ve all played with as kids — the classics featured everything from race cars to wrestlers, and Mantri Cards also has a number of details on each card, featuring different politicians.

Mantri Cards takes its data from PRS Legislative Research, which is based on candidate affidavits. The team behind Mantri Cards—Besides.in—says that the goal is to help people familiarise themselves with the leaders we have and what they stand for.

Mantri Cards is a simple trading card game that even kids can play, which teaches you about Indian politicians.

So you have cards like Narendra Modi, and Rahul Gandhi, based on the data they have submitted, to familiarise people with Indian politicians. 

They say: “Besides stands for transparent and participatory governance, positive civic behaviour, and generally being informed as citizens of a country. With Mantri Cards, we hope to cultivate an interest in the Indian political landscape, especially in the wake of a new parliament coming into power.”

The cards list the candidate’s age, highest educational qualification, criminal cases, declared assets, terms served in Parliament and vote share, along with an illustration of the candidate. The idea is that by playing with these cards, people will become more familiar with the background of the people they’re voting for.

Priced at Rs 500, this is definitely the most accessible, but also the most basic game we came across that engages with politics. However, all three represent something in common—the need to connect with other people in the real world, letting people engage with politics away from the shouting matches on TV, or the endless anxiety of social media.


'Judgementall Hai Kya' Director Prakash Kovelamudi On The Criticism, The Praise And Kangana Ranaut

$
0
0

Kangana Ranaut-Rajkummar Rao-starrer ‘Judgementall Hai Kya’ has opened to mixed reviews from critics. While the film has been universally praised for its compelling performances, the Ekta Kapoor-produced drama’s depiction of a serious mental health illness has been received with scepticism, with some suggesting that it stereotypes those grappling with neurological disorders.

Writing for HuffPost India, psychologist Scherezade Siobhan said, “I dislike harping on accuracy of depiction because clearly this is a film, not an academic paper, but some of the commingling seems like a really amateurish cocktail. This matters simply because mental illness is a scale or a spectrum and one can’t eschew the significance of choosing specificity when it is such an integral part of the storyline.”

HuffPost India caught up with the film’s director Prakash Kovelamudi to ask him how he’s processed the criticism and the praise, and if he’d have changed anything about the film. Spoilers below.

Many people have compared the broad idea of ‘Judgementall Hai Kya’ with the British play ‘Gaslight’.

I didn’t know of the play, or is it a movie, until the reviews came in.

Probably Kanika (Dhillon, the film’s writer) knew of it?

A lot of the things in the film came in organically and I feel that there’s a larger intelligence that was responsible for it.  Our opening shot was never her being upside down looking at the world. It was a little girl looking at the world through a marble which looked upside down. The idea was to show a normal childhood, which slowly starts getting traumatic due to domestic violence.

In our edits, that portion went out. We opened with the abuse as opposed to showing the events preceding it and somehow, this happened to be the opening shot of the adult Bobby. Later on, you also see multiple reflections of her in mirrors. That way, we were aware of the symbolism so we didn’t have to adhere to spoon-feeding a thought. Some cases were just happy accidents.

At least in this film, many elements were defined by a larger intervention. From Kanika to Kangana to Ekta, we are all eclectic people that came together for this project. The rough edges smoothed out and ultimately you will see everyone’s expression in this film. I’m happy that every department is spoken about and everyone is being appreciated.

In her past films, Kangana has been collaborative to the point that the director got sidelined. How did you negotiate that space with her?

We had differences but nothing that threatened the project, because all of us knew what we were making. And the creative conflicts weren’t only restricted to Kangana. There were conflicts between me and the writer, me and Pankaj Kumar (the film’s cinematographer), me and Kangana, Rajkummar Rao and even Ekta Kapoor. These are different creative players with very strong voices. But I always felt that the creative conflict came from a place of all of us having a certain vision for the film that we were trying to achieve. Ultimately everyone arrived to the same point but they arrived through their own route.

I come from a theatre background. I like engaging with actors. I like to see how they interpret a character and what they can do with it. If I’m only stuck to what I’m looking at, I’m not looking at the possibility of what it can be. That training I’ve got from theatre. I like to see other people express themselves and to see how much they can go and where they can go and then choreograph or steer the narrative to my broader vision.

I always felt that the creative conflict came from a place of all of us having a certain vision for the film that we were trying to achieve. Ultimately everyone arrived to the same point but they arrived through their own route

Can you tell me a specific instance of a creative conflict and as a filmmaker with an individualistic vision, how you resolved it to everyone’s satisfaction ?

So, when Pankaj and I had really elaborate discussions on how to film the climax. For me, the (literal) world of the stage had entered Bobby’s mind in the second half and was slowly spilling out into the real world. She first absorbs it and then it starts manifesting into her reality. Now how do we capture that manifestation? Should we do it in a realistic way or with an overdramatised, surreal aesthetic? We decided to go with the surreal. Some of the sequences appear bizarre to the audience but it’s an expression of her fragmented state of mind. It cannot be cohesive or contained in the norm you see.

I felt the film started off steady but towards the end, it kind of started going off the rails.

I don’t think it’s muddled, it’s quite simple in the way it’s told. What gets muddled is her expression of the state of mind and you’re not able to follow a narrative thread in that, which is a conscious choice. If you’re going to view this film with reference to an existing template, it will fall off expectations because it is far beyond. The plot is designed to keep you hinged but what you’re experiencing, through Bobby’s character, is a world from the perspective of a broken mind and her sense of reality and her struggle to find the truth of her own reality.

That was the primary reason to tell the story. The reality of a person with a mental disorder is very different. Nobody can deny them their reality or what their existence is. The first half of the film is told through her point of view and the second half is an objective point of view where you keep shifting between what she’s feeling and how that impacts the proceeding outside and how that further influences her mind.

To me, the film questions the way we look at things and it turns on its head and asks you to look at it differently. My critique is against a society that enables violence. It’s not so much the character as much as the society at large that we fail to see the disorder and point elsewhere. We persecute people with mental illnesses but obviously, they aren’t the ones with the problem. It’s the violence in society that causes this, that’s the root. The person is only a symptom of the disease that exists in our social spaces.

We got a psychologist to review the film and while she appreciated certain aspects, she was also of the opinion that the film uses Bobby’s illness as a prop, instead of looking at it with an investigative gaze.

We had sent the script to a couple of psychiatrists and their feedback was that while it’s not clinically accurate and that we’ve used symptoms from one or two other specific illnesses, at a broad level, to call it psychosis kind of covers everything. For instance, dissociative identity disorder is different from schizophrenia, although there are some overlaps.

The psychiatrists told us to not get into the technicalities of it because our film isn’t A Beautiful Mind or a Silver Linings Playbook where the patient is suffering from an illness and is on the road to recovery. That’s not our narrative. The movie is closer to Black Swan, where the illness propels the narrative without becoming exclusively about it. 

Moreover, we have to communicate this in an entertaining manner so the conversation impacts a larger audience emotionally and makes them look inward about how we judge and straitjacket people easily.

When you watch a sports film, your protagonist may not display the technique in its most authentic form but the point is to get the emotion right. I think that to a large extent we were able to do that, thanks to Kangana’s brilliance.

An extension of the same criticism was how her condition was used as a quirk.

I disagree. If we had left with her being Rowdy Rani or Zara and other characters and how her reality spills into the real world and how that creates funny moments, you could call it a quirk and that’d be fair.

But we’ve gone way beyond that. We’ve shown where the trauma stems from, we’ve shown where it’s manifesting in her everyday life and how it disrupts the work that she does. Which makes her condition even more acute. Then there’s the cockroach which is a metaphor for an itch that you can vaguely locate but can’t scratch—that’s precisely what Bobby is going through.

So I don’t think it’s just a quirk. It takes you into the depths of Bobby’s mind, her helplessness and the manner in which it derails her.

When the action moves from Bombay to London, some felt that the film begins to get slightly implausible, especially with the Ramayana angle.

The second half is about Bobby finding herself. And yes, a lot of people had problems with Ramayana because they felt it didn’t justify itself well. For me, her identifying with Sita and finding her truth in that character by getting lost in this story was fascinating. Like finding your reality through fiction.

For her, it’s not about proving that she’s right to the cops or to the audience but to herself. I read a lot of mythology and like to recontextualise it. It’s a richer way of telling a story. Without Ramayana we could’ve done something else and kept the suspense. Some people say that the idea that she’s Sita and he’s Ravana is already a giveaway. I don’t agree because there’s many times that Ravana is only inside her head.

We’ve shown where the trauma stems from, we’ve shown where it’s manifesting in her everyday life and how it disrupts the work that she does.

But doesn’t he (Rajkummar Rao) encapsulate both, Ram and Ravana, projecting one, living another?

Yep. In fact we had a scene where he says that when she talks about herself being Sita she’s going to be looking for Ravana. He says you should be looking inside your head and that he’s going to protect his wife from her insanity. In this case he is projecting himself as Ram and is calling her Ravana.

Another criticism is on the number of coincidences in the film. She goes all the way to London and finds out that out of all people, her cousin is married to him?

Hmmm. Let me explain. If you look at Indian folklores, a lot of them are tied into the ideas of karma and destiny. There are no coincidences. Everything is designed by a larger force. A bigger energy. I’ll take Sita and Ravana’s analogy itself. In her previous life, Sita takes an oath saying she will come back and destroy Ravana. The Ramayana happens because of this oath, at least this is one of the many interpretations. Which is the beauty of our mythology. If you look at it from Ravana’s point of view, he’s the good guy, he’s the victim of the society we’ve created and is lashing out against that. The idea of him kidnapping her was predestined. In a lot of our mythologies, there’s a lot of coincidences and leaps of faith. Because of mythology, you suspend your beliefs and you don’t question these things because they exist to make a larger point.

That argument works if your film is a fantasy. ‘Judgementall Hai Kya’, to me, didn’t feel like one, although I bought into the universe of the film.

Who’s to say that? I’m telling a story, I’m using mythical elements and a mind that’s fragmented to say the story. It’s a storytelling device. If you’re going to look at it as a logical lapse, there are going to be many.

Once she becomes Sita, she’s no longer Bobby. The scepticism that you project on her is an indictment of how society doubts women. I also wanted to ask—what is Sita’s role in the modern day? She was a goddess in our mythology but it took an agnipariksha for her character to be validated. Which exists even today. We still don’t believe women.  So I wanted to recreate and invert the idea of discovering the truth by having to walk through it. 

It is important that she is Sita. We could’ve chosen Draupadi, or different women from Hindu mythology as pretty much all of them have been persecuted, but this was important because of the idea of agnipariksha. It ties into Bobby’s search for truth. For both herself and for people who are judging her. It ties into fire being a cleansing tool. It ties into what the antagonist feels. There was a reason we didn’t dive that deeply into the psyche of Rao’s character.

Why was that?

Because that would’ve been too much. I wanted the audience to make of what he could’ve been. With male violence, the reasons are irrelevant. You don’t need to know the different reasons but what you need is to recognise that it exists. 

As far as the character development was concerned, where do you open him up? We made a choice that we wanted to open him up in the climax and not before to keep the ambiguity.

He gets off on hearing people scream in pain. For him it’s a power trip. He’s an arsonist who burns one identity down and creates another. In contrast, hers is a condition that is making her recognise that she has a condition and wants to overcome it. She wants to find harmony and balance without harming others. His is a condition that he doesn’t want to recognise and even if he recognises, he thrives on it.

It is important that she is Sita. We could’ve chosen Draupadi, or different women from Hindu mythology as pretty much all of them have been persecuted, but this was important because of the idea of agnipariksha. It ties into Bobby’s search for truth.

Yes, it can also be read as how men and women view violence. More often than not, women are the ones trying to escape it, while the men are the ones inflicting it if not actively seeking it as a way to reinforce their staid notions of masculinity. 

Absolutely. From the feedback that I got, many women have viewed it with her being right and men have viewed it with her being the deranged one giving him the benefit of the doubt. 

The best part about making this movie was how a lot of things started coming out in sharp focus towards the end. Some of it was by design, some appeared on their own. About the pervasiveness of abuse and violence and what it does to people. Ultimately the wounds that you have are the ones that can heal you. The first thing is recognise the wounds, then to embrace them and give them love.

Once Bobby transitions into Sita, she has to hunt Ravana down. He’s gaslighting her with the whistling in the corridor. When she starts chasing him with the axe, the background song that is going on is “Don’t cross the Laxman Rekha, it can destroy you, it can tear you apart” and what you’re seeing is her tipping over, she’s crossing it in her mind and going to the dark side and then the accident happens. When the accident happens, she runs away and when everyone tries to send her back to the asylum, the characters come alive in her head to help her. It’s very much like Sita after she got abducted by Ravana, Hanuman comes and gives her a ring. In the movie, Hanuman comes and tells her that Ramji has sent you a message. These characters help her discover her truth. 

Hers is a condition that is making her recognise that she has a condition and wants to overcome it. She wants to find harmony and balance without harming others. His is a condition that he doesn’t want to recognise and even if he recognises, he thrives on it.

Were you prepared for a polarised response?

If more and more people resonate with it, great, but if not, that’s fine too.

What we consume affects us and it makes us who we are as people. It’s a part of larger human consciousness, a driving force.

I think that I would continue to want to tell stories that have an impact even if it’s a little difficult, even if 30% get it as opposed to 60%. Sure, there could’ve been better ways of telling the story and certain things could’ve been executed better. One choice was if we decided to open him up and say he’s the killer much sooner than what we do now.

Given the current trend of how the box-office draw of a film is looked at as a yardstick to judge its merit, how do you gauge the success of your film?

I don’t want to look at numbers because unfortunately what has happened to cinema is that numbers are dictating the quality of a story, it’s happening a lot in the south. The first thing people ask is not how good your film is, but what is the opening week? I feel the quality should never be determined by the box-office number. That’s a very silly, asking for quantifying art. Now we made a film that is profitable for the people who produced it and it has also made some kind of an impact on the audiences and contributed in some way, I think, in a positive direction to a larger human consciousness or awareness. That itself is a big success. That it didn’t do Rs100 crore is not a yardstick on which you should determine the quality of what this film is and not just this film, I am talking about many other films. For me, even Manmarziyaan was such a beautiful film and the numbers spoke about it not being successful which is a tragedy, because it’s such a well-made film, such a beautiful story, it is a successful film, it should be a successful film and like that there are so many other films.

Tell me a little about extracting that performance from Kangana Ranaut.

It’s Kangana. You don’t have to tell her anything, she understands. The only one thing I told her was that because of the character having this mental disability, your reactions cannot be predictable. Which she knows as an actress. The way she internalised it and the way she would give a comeback, how she would talk, walk etc was astonishing.

Even with Raj, he just needed to keep it real and play it on the edge. The only thing we told him was that he has to be on the edge. Just the half-smile he has and the look he gives, it nails it. It’s the talent that both of them, they feed off each other’s energy.

Kangana is especially gifted for this character as it requires a certain connection to your instincts. The first thing I noticed was that she might decide to pitch a scene differently but at the end of it she’ll give you the same thing you wanted and she’ll give it to you better than you expected because she trusts her own acting instincts and her spontaneity in the moment to deliver it. She might have prepared for it or it could have been spontaneous. We don’t know which one is what. It’s fascinating and sheer joy just to see her perform.

How Biology Is Driving Hindu Nationalism: From Modi To The Zomato Delivery Guy

$
0
0

“Biology” is at the core of Hindu nationalism, and driving the Bharatiya Janata Party’s call to return to the Hindu way of life in India, says Banu Subramaniam, a professor of Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

In her book, Holy Science: The Biopolitics of Hindutva, Subramaniam, who is a trained plant biologist and a PhD in Zoology, writes, “One of the hallmarks of Hindu nationalism is the centrality of “biology” and the scientific within the imagination, teaching, and practices of political nationalism ― claims of common blood, indigenous DNA, unique theories, native ecologies and regimes of bodily discipline are all grounded in a vision of thoroughly scientific nationalism.”

While “bio-politics” was a term first coined by French philosopher Paul-Michel Foucault, Subramaniam, in an interview with HuffPost India, explains it in the context of Hindu nationalism, this prevailing sense of urgency to be a good “Hindu,” and the bigotry leveled at the Zomato delivery guy, this week.

What do you mean by the centrality of biology in Hindu nationalism?

Before I get into “biology” as one particular field within the sciences, let me talk about the sciences in general. One of the striking aspects of Hindu nationalism is its embrace of the sciences. This is unique and striking for a religious nationalist movement. So for example, the rising Christian white nationalism in the United States sees science as a godless threat to humanity, and as oppositional to religion. But, in India science is comprehensively embraced in the nationalist vision. Unlike other religious fundamentalists, modern Hinduism has produced not a scriptural return to a singular sacred text as do most fundamentalisms, but rather a political nationalism through a melding of science and religion. Where other religious nationalisms refuse science, Hindu nationalism embraces science as a central project for Hinduism. But at the same time, they also support patriarchal and casteist values and power structures. What I argue in the book is that this combination results in what I call an “archaic modernity” - Hindu nationalism brings together the past and present, modernity and orthodoxy, science and religion; they embrace capitalism, globalisation, science, and technology as elements of a modern Hindu nation. In the western schema this formation would seem oxymoronic and anachronistic, but within modern India, it is the reassertion of a very Indian modernity aptly captured in the slogan: “Be Modern, Not Western.”

So, Hindu fundamentalism embraces science. It’s fundamentalism all the same. Isn’t that dangerous? 

As I explain above, it’s best to understand it as Hindu nationalism rather than fundamentalism - there is no fundamental scriptural text for Hinduism. My project in the book is to describe and analyse the current situation. Yes, I think Hindu nationalism as it is developing is dangerous, but some of the emerging bio-nationalism isn’t necessarily so, and even has liberatory potentials.

Where other religious nationalisms refuse science, Hindu nationalism embraces science as a central project for Hinduism.

What is the biology of Hindu nationalism? 

“Biopolitics” is a term from the philosopher Michel Foucault who argued that the modern nation state consolidates its power through “biopower” - i.e., modern populations are controlled and regulated through bodies. Modern states use all kinds of popular instruments to control birth and death rates, illness and well being etc — so biology becomes centrally important. I’ve detailed the history and the idea much more in the book. Biology is important everywhere but is central to the Hindu nationalist imagination in very particular ways. 

To give you some examples – we see a call for a return to Hindu ways of life – resurgence in the importance of daily bodily discipline regimes - exercise regimes, meditation, and yoga are extolled because a central tenet is that “strong minds need virile bodies.” These practices form the cornerstone of training young cadres in local shakhas. Hinduism also has widespread laws of purity and pollution, regimes of body care, codes of endogamy, and metaphors of “pure” Hindu blood, and blood ties. Taken together, these are very striking. Body discipline, the centrality of biology and the body in the imagination of the “good” and pure Hindu are thus a core belief or ideology of Hindu nationalism. This is ubiquitous in the speeches of politicians and political platforms. 

Biology is important everywhere but is central to the Hindu nationalist imagination in very particular ways.

Again, isn’t this dangerous? 

Here, I would say not. All cultures have different ways of living. In many ways, one could argue that a model that understands the body and the mind as a connected whole is far more progressive than a western model that creates a mind/body split. In fact, much of modern biology is moving towards more integrated forms of knowledge. It is when these beliefs become violent, supremacist and intolerant of others that I think they become dangerous.

Have these beliefs become violent and dangerous in India right now?

Yes, some of them have been, I agree.

What you are describing asserts homogeneity.  Widespread laws of purity and pollution, regimes of body care, codes of endogamy, and metaphors of “pure” Hindu blood, and blood ties — sounds like Nazi Germany propaganda. How can this not be dangerous? 

These ideals of Hinduism have always existed - so in that sense, yes, it’s always dangerous when some people think they are superior, and other people are “impure” and pollute just through their presence. Some of this is not new in terms of belief - what is new is that we have a Hindu nationalist government in power, and with a majority. How much of this moves from individual and religious community beliefs into governance structures remains to be seen.

Is vegetarianism part of bio-politics? This man refused to get food delivered from a non-Muslim delivery guy because of a Hindu festival. Is this a fallout of bio-nationalism? 

Yes, I would agree. This is a particular understanding of the bio-ethical and moral role of the “cow” in India today that is driving politics to very dangerous and violent ends. Whether something is “beef” is being adjudicated both by a mob and then by “science.” 

Whether something is “beef” is being adjudicated both by a mob and then by “science.”

What are the similarities between Hindutva bio-nationalism and the Nazi race theory? For instance, RSS leaders like Gowalkar and Savarkar argued foreign races in Hindustan must adopt Hindu culture and language. Is bio-nationalism similar to Wilhelm Stuckart’s Nuremberg laws, which led to the persecution of Jews in Nazi Germany.?

At a very broad level, you could argue that all nationalist movements have common elements – all are trying to build and promote a “nation” of some kind. As you say, we could also see elements of an exclusive and nativist vision in both – Aryan and Hindu supremacy. In both, we have also seen violent tendencies – in India the rise of vigilante killings of rationalists, and violence against minorities’ places of worship, beef bans etc. – and these are worrying. More alarming are the direct homage paid to Nazi Germany by some Hindu nationalists. But in many ways they are not the same. 

What I describe in the book is a bio-nationalism in India that is very unique, one that emerges from the long, and very rich, pluralist and syncretic traditions of South Asia.  Sometimes bio-nationalism promotes progressive ends, and at others supremacist politics. The book is trying to explore the richness of the entanglements of science and religion in the subcontinent. As I argue in the book, we should be researching and promoting the rich and robust sciences emerging in the sub continent. Yet we are not.  

Sometimes bio-nationalism promotes progressive ends, and at others supremacist politics.

You write that the alleged hyper-fertility of minority women, especially Muslim women, continues to haunt Hindu nationalists? What does this mean?

If you look at the history of many conflicts in the world, women and women’s reproductive ability consistently become a key political target. Minority communities are always seen as reproducing too much and as threats to the majority community. Women, and their reproductive abilities become the “problem.” For example, India and the Indian population, and Indian women’s fertility have long been such a target to the world – which is why India has been such a central focus of world population control. Today, I point out that within India and the rhetoric of Hindu nationalism, we hear repeated concerns about the hyper-fertile Muslim woman.

But what do Hindu nationalists hope to gain by fixating on it? 

Fear of the “other” is a powerful motivation in many nationalisms. Creating religious minorities as “others” - as non-Indians, and unworthy of citizenship is powerful politics. Part of “othering” is claiming that religious minorities are increasing in numbers through high reproductive rates - so minority women become central sites of control. The same pattern is currently playing out in the United States as well — as it has during much of world history.

You write about Prime Minister Narendra Modi evoking Hindu mythology to talk about plastic surgery. Evoking Hindu mythology to claim that there was plastic surgery in ancient India or that planes were first mentioned in Ramayana seems unscientific and opportunistic. But you cite these examples in the context of science, religion and nationalism. Could you explain?  

What fascinates me in India is this effortless melding of the past and present. The “modern” is given a Hindu/Vedic prehistory in claims by some that modern inventions like airplanes, internet and satellite technology, atomic power, theory of evolution, plastic surgery, genomics and other modern sciences were already present in Vedic times. I use Prime Minister Modi’s statement that “We worship Lord Ganesha. There must have been some plastic surgeon at that time who got an elephant’s head on the body of a human being and began the practice of plastic surgery.” to illustrate how modern science is invoked in the context of a mythological narrative.

Prime Minister Modi could well have claimed that a god could, through divine powers, connect the bodies of an elephant and human, or that god does not need circulating blood or a central nervous system. Rather, he invented a plastic surgeon to perform an operation to connect the two interspecies body parts. This is precisely the imagination of Hindu nationalism that I find fascinating and significant—science and technology and their practi­tioners mediate mythological and divine worlds. Even Hindu gods need doctors. Central to these claims is the idea that modern science was invented in and by Vedic India. It is interesting that these claims are always projected backwards – modern science prefigured in the Vedic period – never the other way around.

“May the force be with you.” PM Modi quoting Star Wars in NYC. How does this relate to science, religion and bio-nationalism? 

Here I was using the quote to signal how thoroughly modern and global Hindu nationalism is. There is much support for Hindu nationalism in the Hindu diaspora. This is not an insular parochial nationalism – but a nationalism that is expansive and open to embrace modern and popular culture to promote itself. 

A nationalism that is expansive and open to embrace modern and popular culture to promote itself.

But the plastic surgery and planes claims are not true. Isn’t this dangerous? 

Yes, it is dangerous for many reasons. It creates an imaginary and false history, it obfuscates what is true and false. Any politics that causes people to follow leaders or movements without questioning, and prevents people from critical thinking is dangerous, I’d agree.

Is science in India secular? Is this a western notion? Does it need to be?

We need to understand and explore why and how science in India plays out differently than science in other parts of the world. This is part of my project in the book – I am trying to move beyond the simplistic characterisations of science and pseudoscience. In India, I show through five case studies, how science and religion are thoroughly entangled – both in the everyday lives of people and at the national level. So for example, medical practitioners may encourage a patient to visit a holy shrine or explore alternative medicine alongside medical treatment. Individuals may go to multiple doctors and religious gurus, even though the systems are completely unrelated and even contradictory in some cases. The claims of whether Adam’s (Ram Setu) bridge is really the bridge Hanuman built in the Ramayana go all the way up to the Supreme court for adjudication. Understanding this, it should not surprise us to hear that the head of ISRO offered pujas before the launch of the Mars orbiter in 2013. This resurgence of Hindu nationalism has also seen a rise in an exuberant consumerism of Vedic India today — ancient wisdom bottled into household products ranging from toothpastes, pulses and spices, to soaps, cleaners and insect repellents. 

We have seen a proliferation of Vedic sciences in Vaastushastra, Ayurveda, Yoga, and other medical technologies. Rather than science being seen as oppositional to religion, Hinduism and science are melded together into a formula that is seen as the best of the east and the west. At the same time, as I show in the book, western scientific technologies have been used by grassroots struggles, activist organisations, and nationalist groups, and the government to make various claims – for example, how genomics is used to make claims about the population genetics of India.  

This resurgence of Hindu nationalism has also seen a rise in an exuberant consumerism of Vedic India today.

Is it secular? 

About secularism, this is a complex question and much has been written about it. Indeed many scholars would argue that science is not secular anywhere in the world.  A case in point is the long history of debates around evolution in the U.S. But it is important here to recognise that secularism in India also isn’t the same as that in other countries. The founders of India constituted a democratic country with a secular and pluralistic vision that was to actively include, support, and encourage all religions (in contrast to an American model of a separation of church and state). 

Hindu nationalists have rather redefined both secularism and democracy – secularism as tolerance and democracy as majoritarianism. Thus, they argue that while the presence of religious minorities should be “tolerated,” the majority Hindus should define and govern India. Religious nationalists imagine a Hindu India for a Hindu people. This is what is at stake – how we imagine India. Ultimately, Indians define the India they want – at present through elected representatives in government. To what extent people voted for the BJP because of their Hindu supremacist agenda versus the promise of good and effective governance is something that time will tell. What is worrying is that the two – Hindu supremacy and good governance – may become the same thing.

Religious nationalists imagine a Hindu India for a Hindu people. This is what is at stake – how we imagine India.

How would Hindu supremacy and good governance become one thing? Could you explain? Would failure to generate jobs, grow the economy, improve the lot of farmers, not matter?

I’d agree that they shouldn’t but might they not? If religious minorities are constructed as THE problem facing the country, might not the two interests converge? This worries me. Also, there are plenty of periods in history where people vote against their economic interests in order to shore up the nation. Politics and political interests can be very complex.

What is worrying is that the two – Hindu supremacy and good governance – may become the same thing.

You write that understanding bio-nationalism is an attempt to understand modernity, but not in the superior mode that Modi invokes. What do you mean? 

The subcontinent does indeed have a rich and diverse history – to reduce that heritage to Hindu supremacy seems like an impoverished reading of the past. Hinduism itself is astonishingly heterogeneous and multifaceted. In addition, we have many ancient animist traditions, religions that were brought into India and several that emerged within India. These rich legacies did not appear yesterday but have coexisted in the subcontinent for centuries. There is a bountiful gift that India inherited in 1947. Yet postcolonial India has done little to draw on this legacy to imagine and develop the sciences. India has constantly looked westward to craft that future, and today, backwards. There is a tremendous opportunity here that I’m afraid has been squandered. Therein lies both my worry and hope. 

India has constantly looked westward to craft that future, and today, backwards.

 

 

 

 




 

How Normal Is Peeing In The Middle Of The Night?

$
0
0
If you are peeing more than once during the night, it might be because of one of these reasons.

If your bladder acts as a middle-of-the-night alarm clock, you might be curious whether it’s a cause for concern.

Turns out you’re in good company if you’re wondering. “Is it normal to pee in the middle of the night?” is one of the most common questions that Marcelino Rivera, a urologist with Indiana University Health, said he gets asked in his practice.

In general, if you are waking up to pee once during the night, it’s likely that is normal for you, Rivera said. The kidneys’ main function is to filter out toxins from the bloodstream and concentrate those toxins into urine. According to Rivera, this is done continuously ― “during the day we are typically [going] every two to four hours depending on hydration status and fluid consumption” ― but at night, the body releases hormones to concentrate the urine more than during the daytime. Hence why we don’t typically wake up as much at night to urinate. 

But if you are peeing more than once during the night or running to the bathroom is disrupting your sleep, you might need to examine other areas of your waking life. 

Here are a few of the most common reasons you may be getting up to pee, whether they’re considered normal and expert advice on what to do about them.

You’re drinking too much H2O, especially close to bedtime

This is pretty obvious: What goes in must come out. If you are drinking several glasses of fluid, you are properly hydrated and have properly functioning kidneys, you will likely wake up to go at night. 

“If your nighttime peeing is due to fluid consumption, stopping two to three hours prior to going to bed will reduce waking up at night,” Rivera said.

It could be your medication

Some prescriptions may cause an increase in nightly bathroom visits, explained Rivera.These may include pills like high blood pressure drugs, some alpha blockers, muscle relaxers and sedatives.

You’ve had some alcohol or caffeine

Alcohol and caffeinated beverages are diuretics, which means that drinking them causes your body to produce more urine. “Consuming alcohol or caffeinated beverages in excess can lead to nighttime waking and needing to urinate,” said Clare Morrison, a general practitioner and medical adviser at MedExpress.

You’re dealing with a sleep disorder 

If you’re peeing multiple times a night, you might have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a condition that causes you to involuntarily stop breathing while you are sleeping. In fact, 84% of patients with sleep apnea have reported frequent nighttime urination.

According to Emily Clionsky, a clinician and researcher with Clionsky Neuro Systems in Springfield, Massachusetts, this can occur in people of all ages and genders. She added that you also don’t have to be overweight or snore while sleeping to have OSA.

Additional symptoms include waking up with a sore or dry throat, restless sleep, loud snoring, morning headaches or mood changes. OSA can be treated through the use of nighttime breathing masks, upper airway stimulation therapy, surgical procedures and oral appliances.

You’re pregnant 

Pregnant women will often experience increased urination. This is due to the pregnancy hormone called human chorionic gonadotropin, or hCG, which can cause an increase of blood flow to the kidneys and your expanding uterus, which then puts pressure on your bladder.  

Aging could be a factor

As people age, bladder capacity tends to dwindle. So even if you are drinking the same amount of liquids as when you were younger, you may have to use the bathroom more often. This can be a normal cause of having to wake up in the night to pee.

Rita Starritt, an internal medicine doctor with Weight Loss MD San Diego, added that as we get older, we tend not to sleep as deeply, “so the urge to pee is more capable of awakening us.”

Starritt noted that “as women go through the menopausal and peri-menopausal period, there are changes in the urethral tissue ... which makes the urge to pee more prominent in our brains.” In addition, there is more leakage as we age, so we may feel compelled to keep less in our bladder, she said.  

You have swollen legs

If you have issues with lower leg swelling, that can contribute to nighttime bathroom trips, according to Rivera.

“When people lie down at night, all of that fluid in the legs starts to redistribute into the bloodstream and then gets filtered by the kidneys and made into urine,” he explained.

Raising or elevating your legs a few hours prior to bed will help, he said. But keep an eye on your leg swelling because lower leg edema may be a sign of cardiovascular disease.

“A weakened cardiovascular system may not be able to pump blood against gravity from the lower part of the body to the heart. Therefore, the legs get swollen and lots of fluid is retained in the body,” added S. Adam Ramin, a urologic surgeon and medical director of Urology Cancer Specialists in Los Angeles.

You have a UTI or prostate issue

If the waking up to pee is also associated with urinary urgency or burning with urination, then it could be a symptom of an issue like a urinary tract infection or an enlarged prostate.

Ramin added that an enlarged prostate leads to thickening of the bladder wall, as the bladder wall muscle has to push against the obstruction of the prostate in order to empty. “Thickening of the bladder wall leads to reduced bladder capacity [and] reduced bladder elasticity, and therefore frequency of urination day and night,” he said.

You have another medical disorder

On rare occasions, peeing in the middle of the night could indicate something more serious. Ramin said an increased urge and increased frequency of urination can exist in patients with disease processes that affect brain function. These may include dementia, Parkinson’s disease, brain tumors, history of brain stroke, radiation to the brain and brain surgery.

Rivera explained that other potential causes of nighttime peeing that are rarer include hormone-secreting tumors. Chirag Shah, co-founder of Push Health, an online health care services platform, added that recurring nighttime urination can also be an early indicator of diabetes. 

When to be concerned

If you are concerned about your nighttime peeing habits, keep a diary of your drinking and urine output, Morrison suggested.

If you’re urinating more than eight times in 24 hours, that’s too much,” she said, adding that it also depends on your age. “If you are between 65 and 70 and going up more than twice a night, you should make an appointment with your general practitioner.”

If your frequent urination is accompanied by things like an increased thirst, weight loss or increased appetite, you should most definitely see your doctor, said Eudene Harry, an emergency and integrative medicine doctor in Orlando, Florida.

Henry added that if you have made changes to your routine to combat some of the above and the problem does not improve or if it gets worse, this is also a cause for concern.

And finally, “if your urine contains blood, you have a fever, pain with urination or you urinate frequently but only in small amounts, these are all signs to give your doctor a call,” Henry said.

Beautiful Quotes About Parenthood From Jason Momoa

$
0
0
Jason Momoa and Lisa Bonet welcomed Lola in 2007 and Nakoa-Wolf in 2008.

Jason Momoa has shared many reflections on the power of parenthood. 

The “Aquaman” star has a daughter, Lola, and son, Nakoa-Wolf, with his wife, Lisa Bonet. He’s also stepfather to Bonet’s adult daughter, Zoë Kravitz

In honor of his birthday, here are 10 lovely parenting quotes from Momoa. 

On His Hopes For His Kids

“The biggest thing I’m trying to do for my children is just let them have their imagination, their creativity and to let that flourish. I hope they get to see I’m striving for my dreams and building new ones always.”

On Becoming A Father

“I really can’t tell you what the hell I was doing before I had kids. Just fucking off. Wasting time. I think I was pretty reckless and definitely a bit out of control. Now I’m more focused. I probably love myself more and take care of myself more because I want to stick around.”

On His Legacy

“I want to be remembered as, I hope, an amazing husband and a great father. My kids are my greatest piece of art. If I can pump them full of amazing stuff and surround them with beautiful art and music, then I’m going to live out my life watching them. They’re already way smarter and just way better than me. God, I love it. It’s beautiful. I want it to be the greatest thing I ever do: make good humans.”

On Teaching His Kids To Love Nature

“If I teach them to learn respect for our natural resources, because if they can admire nature’s truest colors, then they can begin to see the beauty in all things. To be aware of those inconspicuous and overlooked details of life. I want to give them my eyes.”

On His Fatherhood Dreams

“Ever since I was a little boy, I have always wanted to be a father.”

On Traveling For Work

“The nomadic lifestyle that once inspired me ― it now takes me away from the things that I love most: my ohana, my family. I’m afraid of what I’m going to miss the laughs, the cries, being able to help them, teach them. I don’t want to miss those moments.”

On Building A Motorcycle With His Kids

“My wife was like, ‘You’re not allowed to ride with the kids on the bike, absolutely not.’ I went, ‘What if I built the kids a sidecar?’ She goes, ‘I’ll think about it.’ ...  It’s something that’s very dear for me. And just being able to do that with my children. I never really grew up with that. I was from a single mother who taught me many, many, many things but I didn’t grow up with a father-figure who I was wrenching on cars with ... All I have is being at home and being a papa. I don’t want them to know me as my job. I just wanted to build a Harley with my kids. And I’m really happy my wife let me do it because ultimately she’s the boss.”

On Growing Up Without A Father

“The great thing is all my friends were fathers, I didn’t have a dad around all the time but it’s my buddies and uncles who raised me. The things I learned from them and what we passed on to each other. I’ve learned so much from my friends.”

On The Power Of His Children

“With them, my dreams finally came true. I’m a father. I found my place, my home.”

On Single Moms

“God bless all the single mothers. You are truly superheroes.”

How To Resolve A Dispute With Your Landlord

$
0
0

There are plenty of benefits to renting instead of buying your home. For one, you don’t have to pay for major repairs and maintenance out of your own pocket. Plus, you can pick up and move with relative ease, since you aren’t tied down by a mortgage.

But if you find yourself in disagreement with your landlord, things can turn ugly quickly.

As a renter, conflicts with your landlord are bound to occur at some point. Whether you disagree over who pays for a repair or how much of your security deposit you should get back when moving out, it can feel like you don’t have much negotiation power as a tenant. That’s not necessarily the case, however. Here’s what you should know about landlord-tenant disputes and how to resolve them. 

3 Common Sources Of Landlord-Tenant Disputes

Many disagreements between landlords and tenants happen when there are conflicting interpretations of clauses within the lease. It can be helpful to know what potential disputes might arise, and to do your best to clarify the terms of your rental ahead of time.

Wear and tear vs. damage

Baseball through the kitchen window? Damage to your drywall? Accidents happen, and sometimes those accidents cost you.

“However, sometimes tenants are blamed for damages that aren’t necessarily their fault,” said Lance J. Robinson, a criminal defense and personal injury attorney in New Orleans. “When the landlord requests money to make repairs and the tenant believes they aren’t at fault, heated conflict may ensue.” 

The problem is that the line between what’s considered normal wear and tear and actual damage can be blurry, according to Brian Davis, a landlord, real estate investor and co-founder of SparkRental.com.

“Sometimes tenants will feel that landlords have deducted money from the security deposit for what should be considered normal wear and tear,” Davis said. A general rule of thumb, he said, is that damage is usually caused by one singular incident, whereas normal wear and tear is something that happens gradually over time. Think a red wine spill on the carpet vs. a trail of discoloration in a high-traffic area. Of course, both parties want to interpret the difference in their own favor, he said. 

Nonurgent repairs

It’s in the best interest of a landlord to take care of emergency repairs such as a damaged roof or burst pipe as soon as possible. After all, the longer the problem exists, the more damage that results. However, when it comes to less urgent repairs and upgrades, landlords are more likely to push back, since every penny they spend on a rental property is a business expense that counts against their bottom line.

“Repairs are one of those issues where landlord and tenant interests aren’t always aligned,” Davis said. “If a tenant feels that there’s an important repair that the landlord is dragging their feet on, that’s often an area where landlords and tenants really butt heads and tenants get upset.”

Davis noted that some lease agreements will have a clause stating that the tenant is responsible for repairs that cost less than $50, and the landlord handles repairs worth more than that amount, for instance. But typically, the landlord is responsible for all repairs and maintenance other than routine things like replacing light bulbs and air filters. “There are just too many things that can come up for a lease to spell them all out in detail,” Davis said.

Subletting and guest policies

Davis said there are two sections of your lease agreement that you should pay special attention to. The first is the guest policy, which refers to the point at which a guest needs to be added to the lease as a tenant. This, he said, is particularly important for single tenants who are dating or have a significant other who spends a lot of time at the property. “A thorough lease agreement will restrict the number of nights that the guest can spend the night in a given month, without being added to the lease as full tenant who’s liable,” Davis said. 

The other section you should review carefully is related to subletting, or renting out a space that you’re currently renting to someone else. Davis said this has become more of a point of contention in recent years with the rise of Airbnb and other short-term rental services.

“If a tenant is thinking about renting out rooms or even renting out the entire unit on Airbnb, that person should pay particular attention to subletting clauses,” Davis said. Many rental agreements explicitly prohibit this practice without the landlord’s written consent.

Robinson added that subletting is a luxury that not all landlords offer. Even so, “it’s a rule that a lot of tenants break,” he said. 

How To Handle A Conflict With Your Landlord

If you do end up in a battle over money or interpretation of the lease, your goal should be to resolve the issue quickly ― the roof over your head might depend on it. Here are the steps you should take.

Be a good tenant. Working out a resolution with your landlord will go a lot smoother if you have a history of being a good tenant. “If you pay your rent on time, try your absolute best to follow their rules and always be communicative and transparent, any conflict you encounter with your landlord should be many times easier to manage,” Robinson said. When discussing the problem at hand, remain calm and respectful, and remind your landlord you’ve been a stand-out tenant. They would probably rather keep a good tenant happy than to lose out on rental income while they find a new one. 

Understand your lease agreement top to bottom. Next, you should re-read your lease and make sure you fully understand all the terms. “The better you understand your lease, the more leverage you have,” Robinson said. You’ll also have more power to negotiate if you disagree with a particular clause. “You’d be surprised how reasonable landlords can be if you know your stuff and they trust you,” he said.

So, before you contact your landlord with a few strong words, read the contract thoroughly so you can best state your case.  

Keep detailed records. When it comes to landlord-tenant disputes, many disagreements boil down to he-said, she-said situations. That’s why you should keep records of your home’s condition, communications with your landlord and anything else that could be used as proof should a conflict arise.

“One of the most important things you can do when you move into a new apartment is to take photos and keep a detailed log of all the pre-existing damages,” Robinson said. “This way, the landlord will have no reason to be suspicious of you if they come across damage they weren’t aware of previously.

When it comes to communicating with your landlord over a dispute, it’s a good idea to keep a paper trail in case things end up in court. “Certified mail is best, because it’s independently verified through the Postal Service,” Davis said. He noted that email is also acceptable and usually holds up in court.

Take them to court. Finally, if you can’t come to a resolution on your own, you might need to take a more serious approach. Davis said the threat of legal action can be effective, especially if the communication comes from an attorney. Most landlords don’t want to take time off from work and go through the hassle of small claims court, especially if it’s over a relatively small about of money.

“It depends on whether the landlord feels that they have a very strong case ... if they don’t feel confident that they can defend themselves in court and win, they will often back down at that point,” Davis said.

Davis also pointed out that some cities and states are much more tenant-friendly than others, and landlords will be especially hesitant to go to court when the judge is unlikely to rule in their favor ― a situation he’s personally experienced. “There were times when tenants did threaten legal action, and even though I was quite confident that I was legally within my rights as a landlord to deduct money to repair damages, I still ended up budging on it and giving the money back because I knew that the judge was probably going to side with tenant,” he said.

Apartment hunting site Rent Cafe examined landlord-tenant laws in 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, comparing 10 common aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship such as security deposits, rent increases, eviction notices and more, to rank which side each state’s legislation tended to favor. Of course, you shouldn’t threaten legal action with the assumption your landlord will back down, but it can be helpful to know where you might stand a better chance.

Ultimately, every tenant-landlord relationship is different. And, as many know from experience, some are much better than others. The best thing you can do to prevent conflicts with your landlord is to take the time necessary to find the right place.

“The absolute worst thing you can do when apartment hunting is to settle,” Robinson said. “Although it’s common to make compromises when comparing landlords and properties, you should never settle and hastily sign a lease just because you’re ready for the search to be over.”

The 10 Wildest Celebrity Looks Of The Week

$
0
0

August is officially upon us, and to celebrate all its hot and humid glory, Hollywood’s boldest and brightest are stepping out in their boldest and brightest fashions.

This week, the red carpet saw no shortage of deep necklines, fun patterns, bright colors and, in Renée Zellwegger’s case, puffy sleeves.

Lena Dunham looked on fire in orange sequins and feathers at the London premiere of “Once Upon A Time... In Hollywood.” The week also featured quite possibly the fanciest pajama set we’ve seen. And we even got a tie-dye moment, courtesy of Jason Sudeikis.  

Check out the 10 wildest celebrity fashion looks of the week below. 

Carly Rae Jepsen performing during her "Dedicated" tour in Atlanta on July 28.

Carly Rae Jepsen

Carly Rae Jepsen performing during her "Dedicated" tour in Atlanta on July 28. Paras Griffin via Getty Images
Jason Sudeikis at the premiere of "Driven"  in Hollywood, California, on July 29.

Jason Sudeikis

Jason Sudeikis at the premiere of "Driven"  in Hollywood, California, on July 29. Jon Kopaloff via Getty Images
Lena Dunham at the U.K. premiere of "Once Upon A Time... In Hollywood" in London on July 30.

Lena Dunham in 16Arlington and Jimmy Choo

Lena Dunham at the U.K. premiere of "Once Upon A Time... In Hollywood" in London on July 30. David M. Benett via Getty Images
Marlo Hampton at a "Brian Banks" screening in Atlanta on July 30.

Marlo Hampton

Marlo Hampton at a "Brian Banks" screening in Atlanta on July 30. Paras Griffin via Getty Images
Deanne Reynolds at the premiere of "Them That Follow" in Los Angeles on July 30.

Deanne Reynolds

Deanne Reynolds at the premiere of "Them That Follow" in Los Angeles on July 30. Amanda Edwards via Getty Images
Kaitlyn Dever at the premiere of "Them That Follow" in Los Angeles on July 30.

Kaitlyn Dever in Andrew Gn

Kaitlyn Dever at the premiere of "Them That Follow" in Los Angeles on July 30. Amanda Edwards via Getty Images
Renée Zellweger as Moet & Chandon at the Hollywood Foreign Press Association's Grants Banquet in Beverly Hills, California, on July 31.

Renée Zellweger

Renée Zellweger as Moet & Chandon at the Hollywood Foreign Press Association's Grants Banquet in Beverly Hills, California, on July 31. Michael Kovac via Getty Images
Fredrik Eklund visits "Extra" in New York on July 31.

Fredrik Eklund

Fredrik Eklund visits "Extra" in New York on July 31. Jamie McCarthy via Getty Images
Kerry Washington attends Hollywood Foreign Press Association's Annual Grants Banquet in Beverly Hills, California, on July 31.

Kerry Washington in Elie Saab

Kerry Washington attends Hollywood Foreign Press Association's Annual Grants Banquet in Beverly Hills, California, on July 31. Kevin Winter via Getty Images
Emily Tremaine attends a photo call for Netflix's "Otherhood" in Hollywood, California, on July 31.

Emily Tremaine

Emily Tremaine attends a photo call for Netflix's "Otherhood" in Hollywood, California, on July 31. Leon Bennett via Getty Images

29 Tweets About Anxiety That Will Make You Say 'Same'

$
0
0

Dealing with anxiety is part of being human. Now a trending Twitter hashtag is reminding people just how normal it is to feel anxious in everyday situations. 

On Wednesday, the popular Hashtag Roundup account called on Twitter users to share #ThingsThatGiveMeAnxiety. Needless to say, the responses were quite relatable.

Keep scrolling for 29 highlights. 


Car Driven By IAS Officer Mows Down Journalist In Kerala

$
0
0

Thiruvananthapuram, Aug 3 (PTI) A young journalist of a local newspaper was killed early Saturday when a car driven by an IAS officer, allegedly in an inebriated state, mowed him down.

The 33-year-old IAS officer, Sreeram Venkitaraman, who was appointed Survey Director by the state cabinet on Thursday, was behind the wheel when the accident occurred, a senior police officer said.

Venkitaraman, also a Medical doctor and Fullbright Fellow, had recently returned to the state after completing higher studies abroad. He was accompanied by model-friend Wafa Firoze, the owner of the luxury car.

The rashly driven car hit the stationary motorcycle of K Muhammed Basheer (35), Bureau Chief of Malayalam newspaper ‘Siraj’, at Museum road in the heart of the city as he was returning home from work.

Parts of the motorbike and the car were strewn around and Basheer’s slippers and some articles were found metres away from the accident spot. Blood stains were seen on the road.

According to police, a case has been registered under section IPC 279 (rash driving on a public way) and 304A (punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder) against the two accused.

Eyewitnesses told television channels that the car overtook some autorickshaws and hit the motorcycle at a high speed.

Due to the impact of the collision, Basheer was thrown off his bike, suffering serious injuries and died on the spot.

Though Venkitaraman had earlier reportedly stated that his friend wad driving the car, the woman later in her statement told police categorically that it was the IAS officer who was behind the wheel at the time of the crash.

“There were conflicting statements on who drove the car. We have now confirmed from independent witnesses that Sreeram Venkitaraman was driving the vehicle,” IGP and Thiruvananthapuram Police commissioner, Dhinendra Kashyap, told PTI.

The blood samples and statement of the official has also been taken.

Venkitaraman, who is also said to be injured, was admitted to a private hospital here.

Kerala Union of Working Journalists (KUWJ) has demanded a proper and truthful investigation in the case to bring the guilty to book.

Transport Minister A K Saseendran said IAS officers should set an example for others by following rules and regulations strictly.

Steps would be taken to cancel the driving license of the accused, he told reporters.

Expressing deep shock and grief, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan said the media fraternity had lost a member who had a bright future.

Leader of Opposition, Ramesh Chennithala and Devaswom Minister, Kadakkampally Surendran, were among those who expressed grief on the death of the journalist who leaves behind his wife and two children.

The KUWJ has also shot off separate letters to Vijayan and DGP Loknath Behera, demanding an impartial and transparent probe into the incident and that culprits be booked.

Sacred Games Season 2: We Don't Want To Provoke, Says Vikramaditya Motwane

$
0
0

Mumbai, Aug 2 (PTI) Filmmaker Vikramaditya Motwane says any political commentary made on the show “Sacred Games” comes from a responsible space and is never done to “poke” people.

Last year when the show started streaming, a certain section took offence over alleged use of derogatory language while talking about politics and politicians.

When asked if the team was cautious going forward with season two, Motwane, who is the showrunner for the Netflix Original series, told PTI that the intent is never to provoke anyone.

“We haven’t gone out there to poke or unnecessarily needle anyone. We don’t want to provoke. We are all responsible filmmakers. So even if we are making a political statement, we are making it from a specific point of view,” he said.

The first season of the series was directed by Anurag Kashyap and Motwane. It featured Saif Ali Khan and Nawazuddin Siddiqui in lead roles.

Motwane said if the makers have to make a statement, they would always make them from a genuine space.

“If you’re making a statement just to poke, people can see that. If you’re making it to say something genuinely, people can understand that as well. They are smart enough to see the difference,” he added.

The sophomore season of the show, based on author Vikram Chandra’s novel of the same name, will pick up from Sartaj Singh (Khan) pursuing his relentless battle of saving Mumbai and Ganesh Gaitonde (Siddiqui) facing bigger challenges to retain his position as the legendary kingpin of the city.

Like season one, Kashyap is at the helm of the portions featuring Siddiqui, while Neeraj Ghaywan of “Masaan” fame has come onboard to direct the scenes with Khan.

Motwane and Varun Grover return as the showrunner and the lead writer, respectively for the show which starts steaming from August 15.

Govt. Assured Us No Move To Repeal Article 35-A, 370. Want Statement In Parliament: Omar Abdullah

$
0
0

Srinagar, Aug 3 (PTI) National Conference leader Omar Abdullah on Saturday said Jammu and Kashmir Governor S P Malik has assured his party that no moves are planned on repealing Articles 370 and 35A of the Constitution, or the state’s trifurcation.

However, the former J&K chief minister said he wants an assurance on these issues from the Centre in Parliament on Monday.

Abdullah and some of his party colleagues met the Governor Saturday on these issues. “He assured us that there was no movement on (repealing) Article 370 or Article 35A or delimitation (of constituencies in the state),” he told reporters here.

Abdullah said he has asked his party MPs to move a motion in Parliament on Monday seeking a statement from the Union government on the situation that has developed in Jammu and Kashmir over the past few weeks.

“We want the government make a statement on situation in the state in the Parliament,” he said.

Abdullah appealed to the people of the state to keep calm and control their emotions and not take any step that may align with the aim of the people with vested interests.

20 Dead In Texas Walmart Mass Shooting

$
0
0

Twenty people have been killed in a mass shooting at a Walmart store in El Paso, Texas, authorities said, and police have a 21-year-old male suspect in custody.

The Saturday morning massacre also injured 26 people, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said at a press conference. 

“Texas grieves for the people of El Paso today,” Abbott said. “A day that would have been a normal day for someone to leisurely go shopping turned into one of the most deadly days in the history of Texas. Lives were taken who should still be with us today.”

Del Sol Medical Center spokesman Victor Guerrero told HuffPost the El Paso hospital has 11 patients from the shooting, nine of whom were in critical condition. The other two he listed as stable condition.

Police said blood donations are “needed urgently.” 

Law enforcement officers outside the El Paso Walmart where the mass shooting occurred.

Sgt. Robert Gomez of the El Paso Police Department at an earlier press briefing confirmed the arrest of the one male suspect. El Paso Mayor Dee Margo previously said three suspects had been taken into custody, but Gomez said police did not believe there “is anybody outstanding.” 

The suspect has been identified by multiple outlets as 21-year-old Patrick Crusius, originally from Allen, Texas, a town near Dallas that’s some 650 miles east of El Paso.

KTSM-TV in El Paso showed a photo of what appears to be the shooter holding a long gun and entering the Walmart. 

The El Paso Police Department responded at 10 a.m. Saturday to the area of the Cielo Vista Mall where reports came of the shooting.

Video posted on Facebook by a person claiming to be a witness shows a body lying on the floor of the Walmart with blood near its head. Parents can be seen shielding their children’s eyes as they rush them out of the store.

Another video posted to Twitter appears to show multiple bodies in the parking lot. A woman can be heard asking, “Who needs CPR?” The videos contain graphic images so HuffPost is not linking to them. 

Other stores in the area were evacuated.

Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke, who had represented El Paso in Congress from 2013-19, said backstage at a forum for Democratic presidential candidates in Las Vegas that he would be returning home to El Paso. 

“We know that there’s a lot of injury, a lot of suffering in El Paso right now. I’m incredibly sad,” O’Rourke told reporters, as he choked up. “It’s very hard to think about this. But I’ll tell you, El Paso is the strongest place in the world. This community is going to come together. I’m going back there right now, to be with my family and to be with my hometown.”

'Hobbs & Shaw' Director Addresses A Stomach-Churning Rumor

$
0
0

When it comes to one “Hobbs & Shaw” rumor, director David Leitch says not so fast ... and furious.

In the new “Fast and Furious” spinoff, which follows the exploits of Hobbs (Dwayne Johnson) and Shaw (Jason Statham) as they go around the globe trying to save the world from a super virus, there’s a moment where the two protagonists and Shaw’s sister/rogue MI6 agent Hattie (Vanessa Kirby) all have to pile into a cramped McLaren. It’s part thrilling as they evade the pursuit of superhuman villain Brixton (Idris Elba) and part comedic seeing all three of them squished into such a tiny space, but is it also part lies?

Gasp.

The Rock wasn’t actually there in that tiny car, Statham told Fox 5 entertainment reporter Kevin McCarthy in an interview. The actor claimed The Rock had to be added into the McLaren with CGI because he gets motion sickness and, to quote Statham, his “ass is too big.” The info then made its way around the internet faster than Dominic Toretto can get off the starting line in a street race.

In a later interview with McCarthy, The Rock said Statham was joking but also added that the McLaren was small, saying, “I don’t fit in a McLaren to begin with, let alone with two other people.”

So what’s the truth? Was Johnson added into the car chase using CGI because of motion sickness and a compact compartment? Or could Statham and Kirby have smelled what The Rock was cooking?

According to Leitch, who’s also helmed “John Wick” and “Deadpool 2,” the spinoff rumor is spinning its wheels.

“He fits in the McLaren. I’ll tell you that much,” the director said to HuffPost.

He continued, “We were all worried about it. And that was sort of the gag. That was my idea of they should all be jammed in there. That’s sort of comedic to me. I thought that was funny. And so we’re early on in production, we had all stunt doubles in the car just to see if we could make it happen. And by the way, it was not easy to get him in. But he’s in there, and he’s making it happen.”

Reps for DNEG, the VFX studio that handled the McLaren scenes, did not immediately return HuffPost’s request for comment, but when asked one more time to clarify things, Leitch laughed and reiterated that, “Yes,” the Rock was in the car and was not CGI’d. 

As that issue may be cleared up for now, it’s time to move on to even more important questions with Leitch, like what would really happen if The Rock lassoed a helicopter with a chain ... 

Can The Rock actually hold a helicopter with one arm in real life?

Absolutely. That’s not movie magic. Have you seen his workouts on Instagram? That’s a warmup.

One of the great things about “Fast and Furious” movies is they always take things a step further, like The Rock redirecting a torpedo in “Fate of the Furious,” but is there ever a feat The Rock can’t do? Or are you always trying to push things more?

I think that there’s an appetite, honestly, to always push it, but we had a great producer Chris Morgan, who’s like the architect of the franchise, and has been involved in most of these. And he’s been really good at knowing the barometer of what the “Fast” audience wants. I mean, he’s the guy I think that came up with the idea of Dwayne pushing the missile away in the last movie, at least the submarine bit of it all, so the long and short is that we want to go big. But I can’t tell you that there weren’t conversations like, “How long is he going to hold that chain?” Editorially, I have a couple versions which are a lot longer, and then we came up with like, “OK, this might be too much.”

So how long could he hold that helicopter chain?

[Laugh] I think we have just the right amount in the movie. How about that?

Fair enough. What set piece changed the most from the start to where it ended up on-screen?

The set piece with the cars hanging up the helicopter was kind of a last-minute addition. We’d already flown to Hawaii, and we were already three days out from shooting that section of the movie. And what happened was we realized we had some time with the second unit that was there and we had some resources ... and we can potentially make something bigger, and marketing guys were up for it. Chris Morgan had this idea of like what if the brothers are hanging trying to pull the helicopter down. And I like the idea that it was telling the story of the brothers coming together sort of metaphorically, like the family’s reuniting.

So the last minute, stunt department, special effects department and visual effects all had a meeting. And I’m like, “OK, guys.” I’d drawn up some quick sketches. And I’m like, “I know we start shooting tomorrow. But we’re here for a month. I have this big idea.” And normally a sequence like that you’d prep for three months on its own, but I had the right people, and everyone was willing. And we put together the actual, that section of the cars hanging off the helicopter, within a couple weeks, and then we shot it towards the end of that schedule.

Whoa. That’s awesome. What would’ve been there if you didn’t have the cars? Just the ending fight with Idris?

It was really just hooking the helicopter, and then tug of war off the cliff, that’s it. They hook the helicopter, they drive toward the cliff edge and everything sort of tumbles over the edge. That’s kind of what you had. And then you had the fight at the end. You didn’t have the brothers coming together, the reconnecting, the chain of cars, the dangling over the cliff, that was all added basically three days out.

That’s pretty cool.

Honestly, I have years of production experience and I would have never offered it up if I didn’t think we have the resources to make it happen. And we have the right people with the right sensibility. We had the time, and it just makes sense. Can we push the level and make that sort of iconic “Fast” moment?

As far as another scene that changed, The Rock said he originally was going to bite someone’s eye out during the fight at Samoa. Is that true?

He did. He really wanted to bite the guy’s cheek. He’s like, “I want to bite his face, rip his cheek off and spit it out.” I’m like, we can do that, not for real, we can do that in movie magic. But I was always like, “I don’t think we’re gonna get the PG-13 rating on that, buddy.” So he knew that, but I also think he was so fired up to fight, in that sort of “Braveheart”-like passion, embracing his culture that way like a Samoan warrior. He was just amped up. And we did some great stuff. And so he wanted to try some things. And obviously, that couldn’t make the PG-13 cut. A lot of bludgeoning.

How’d the cameos work out with Ryan Reynolds and Kevin Hart?

It was sort of my intention to take the tone of the “Fast” world to a different place. So especially because Hobbs and Shaw are known for their comedy and their banter, I wanted to make sure that that tone was sort of like sprinkled throughout the movie in the other characters that will come onboard. So getting Ryan to show up and play the Locke character was a big deal for me. I reached out, I asked him, “Hey, man, there’s a simple exposition scene, you kind of send Hobbs and Shaw on the journey, sort of a classic setup. Would you be interested?” He’s like, “Absolutely.” Then I sent him the pages. And he does what Ryan does best. He put it all in Locke’s voice and he created a bunch of jokes and there’s a ton on the cutting room floor. There’s just so much good stuff when Ryan shows up that a lot of it, you can’t even use it all.

In terms of Kevin, again, having him available to help with the tone of this movie was so amazing. And like, he’s friends with Dwayne. They were working it out,  how are we gonna wrap him into this movie and found a great role. He’s sort of like the Leo Getz of our world. And it’s perfect for him. And it gives us the promise that maybe Kevin comes back in this universe in the future. Fingers crossed.

You have a joke about the “Game of Thrones” ending in one of the post-credit scenes. How late did you shoot that, because “Game of Thrones” ended in May?

The movie, when we screened the premiere in LA, and the incident happened with the exploding seat or whatever, the print was still wet.

[At the “Hobbs & Shaw” premiere in LA, water spilled on an electrical outlet creating sparks and causing attendees to flee the theater.]

We were, like, constantly adjusting and changing things as long as we could because our post was so short. So we had shot that Ryan scene maybe two weeks before the premiere? Three weeks before the premiere?

The Rock and Ryan Reynolds had great chemistry together. What about a Dwayne Johnson cameo in “Deadpool 3”?

I love it. They do have great chemistry for sure. I think putting those guys together in anything is a good idea.

An appearance by another star, Keanu Reeves, didn’t work out. I know you’ve talked about this rumor before, but if it had worked out, what would he have done in the movie?

We still didn’t have the script locked down when we first talked to him, and we were talking about him playing a villain, and then as we pushed on later there were other opportunities for different roles. And, anytime I could get to work with Keanu would be great. So, we didn’t have anything super locked down in terms of what we could be. We just really wanted to just have a conversation with him. And so even when we got to the late stages, and I was able to show him pieces of the movie, we wanted it to be a conversation, but at the end of the day it just became ... he was good in the sense that there are so many things that we were already dealing with in terms of stories to tell and cameos we had that it didn’t seem like the right time.

Viewing all 46147 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>