Quantcast
Channel: Huffington Post India
Viewing all 46147 articles
Browse latest View live

2012 Delhi Gang-Rape Convict Vinay Sharma Approaches EC Over Mercy Plea

$
0
0
A Indian police vehicle believed to be carrying the accused in a gangrape and murder case, leaves the Saket District Court following the verdict in New Delhi on September 10, 2013.  An Indian court convicted four men of the gang rape and murder of a physiotherapy student on board a moving bus in a crime that sickened the nation.   AFP PHOTO/  MANAN VATSYAYANA        (Photo credit should read MANAN VATSYAYANA/AFP via Getty Images)

Vinay Sharma, one of the convicts in the 2012 Delhi gang-rape case on death row, has now approached the Election Commission of India challenging the rejection of his mercy plea. 

IANS reported that Vinay Sharma told the EC that deputy chief minister of Delhi Manish Sisodia was ineligible to quash is mercy plea because the Model Code of Conduct was in place in Delhi. 

Advocate AP Singh represented Sharma in the case. 

According to the report, Sharma claimed only a WhatsApp screenshot was sent to him rejecting his plea, even though digital signatures of Sisodia were needed in the plea. 

This comes a day after Sharma reportedly self-harmed at the Tihar Jail in Delhi. 

NDTV reported that Sharma approached a court for medical treatment for injuries to his head, right arm and even treatment for schizophrenia. 

According to his lawyers, he Sharma is reportedly unable to recognise his mother. 

Sharma, along with Pawan Gupta, Akshay Thakur and Mukesh Singh are scheduled to be hanged on March 3 art 6 am. 


Bengaluru Woman Charged With Sedition For Saying ‘Pakistan Zindabad’ At Anti-CAA Event

$
0
0
Bengaluru woman charged with sedition.

A young woman who raised “Pakistan Zindabad” slogan at a protest event against the CAA, NRC and NPR in Bengaluru was arrested on Thursday evening and charged with sedition. She has been sent to 14 days in judicial custody.

In a video of the incident, the woman, identified as Amulya Leona, is heard saying her “Pakistan Zindabad” thrice as she the took stage after the event organisers invitation to address the gathering.

AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi, who was present on stage when the woman began to speak, shook his head and interrupted her to say “Kya bol rahein hain aap (What are you saying)?”.

As Leona tried to continue speaking, other men—including the event organisers—surrounded her, attempting to take the mike away and remove her from the stage.

Amidst the commotion, she then said “Hindustan zindabad” while a man said “Aap nahi bol sakte (You cannot speak)”.

As men on stage tussled with her to take the mike away, Leona held on and said,“I will speak... the difference between ‘Pakistan zindabad’ and ‘Hindustan zindabad’ is that...”

While she attempted to finish her sentence a few times, Leona was stopped and dragged away from the stage by a group of men, which included police officers.

Owaisi, who addressed the gathering later, said he did not agree with the woman, whom he described as “so called liberal” and asked all liberals to refrain from any events involving Muslims.

“Neither me nor my party has any link with her. We denounce her. The organisers should not have invited her here. If I knew this, I would not have come here. We are for India and we no way support our enemy nation Pakistan. Our entire drive is to save India,” the AIMIM MP said, according to PTI.

He then asked people to stay away from liberals. “If they (liberals) were so concerned about the Muslims and CAA, they should have their own Shaheen Bagh kind of protests,” he reportedly said.

Kavita Krishnan, activist and politburo member of the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist), said the Leona’s words must be seen in the context of a Facebook post she put up on February 16, in which she wrote, “Hindustan Zindabad, Pakistan Zindabad, Bangladesh Zindabad, Sri Lanka Zindabad, Nepal Zindabad, Afghanistan Zindabad, China Zindabad, Bhutan Zindaba. Be it any country Zindabaad to all Nations.”

NDTV said that Leona was denied bail and sent to judicial custody for 14 days. Her bail petition will be heard in court on Monday.

According to The NewsMinute, Leona is a student of NMKRV College in Bengaluru and was among the three women who asked Mahesh Vikram Hegde, founder of the fake news website Postcard News, to sing ‘Vande Mataram’ at the Mangaluru airport in January.

Both the BJP and the Congress condemned the woman’s actions.

The Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) members and Karnataka Rakshana Vedike (Praveen Shetty faction) staged separate demonstrations in Bengaluru, demanding the externment of Amulya Leona.

Meanwhile, at the anti-CAA event, Owaisi slammed the BJP government in Karnataka for charging a parent and the headmistress of a school with sedition following an anti-CAA play staged at a school in Bidar.

On CAA, Owaisi said it “smacked of governments hatred” towards Muslims and was against poor. “The law is aimed at making Muslims stateless,” he charged.

12 'Little' Relationship Milestones That Are Actually A Big Deal

$
0
0
The little milestone moments can be just as eventful as the bigger ones.

The big relationship moments — like the first date, meeting the parents, moving in together, getting engaged and getting married — seem to get all the attention. Sometimes the smaller (but still significant!) moments don’t nearly get the credit they deserve.

We asked people to reveal the “little” relationship milestones that were actually a big deal to them. Here’s what they said: 

1. The first time they cry in front of you. 

“My husband is a big guy. I nicknamed him ‘Bear’ because he’s so huge. But he’s also so mushy. When I was first leaving London (we were long-distance at the time), he started crying. It was so beautiful to see a man be so vulnerable with me. He cried basically the whole way to the airport and, from what I hear, the rest of the night. He is such a darling. Crying in front of your partner is a true moment of clarity. It shows you the levels this person feels and emotions they’re capable of.” ― Gigi Engle, sexologist and author of “All the F*cking Mistakes: A Guide to Sex, Love, and Life”

2. The first time you put up an Instagram pic together.

“This one was actually a massive one for me but probably extremely minuscule and even laughable to others. It was when we posted photos together on Instagram (aka #IGofficial). It was a little bigger of a deal for me since the 215,000 people who follow me didn’t even know I was in a relationship and that we had secretly been traveling together for about four months before I posted about it!” — Alyssa Ramos of “My Life’s a Travel Movie”

3. The first time they take you as a date to a work event. 

“My husband, Amit, owns a performing arts company (AATMA Performing Arts) and works with kids as well. It was really special when he actually took me to meet all the kids and their parents. It was as if he was making it official that I’m his life partner. Especially being South Asian and identifying as part of the LGBTQ+ community, that is a big and courageous move, which proved that we were really in this forever.” ― Aditya Madiraju, blogger 

4. The first time you go on a trip together.

“The third date for my now-wife and me was a cruise, which felt like a real make-or-break situation for a new couple. Packing. Flying. Keeping track of passports and documents. Living in a small space together for a week. A bathroom with very little privacy. It went great, which boded really well for our future together. Four years and many cruises, resorts, flights, drives and hotels later, we are a great pair at home and on the road.” — Jenny Block, author of “Be That Unicorn: Find Your Magic. Live Your Truth. Share Your Shine”

5. The first time they refer to you as ‘Mommy’ or ‘Daddy’ to their pet. 

“My wife had a dog when we met. It had been a long time since I had a dog, and I forgot how much I missed having one. I instantly bonded with him and grew so attached to him. So the first time she referred to me as ‘Daddy’ to him instead of ‘Dan’ was huge to me. Up until that point, I wasn’t sure if I won her over yet, but after that day I was 100% sure.” — Dan Regan, comedian 

6. The first time you reveal your kinks in the bedroom.

“While for some people it might be silly or weird, it felt really good to tell my partner that I’m submissive. Trying choking and bondage with him was incredibly healing and bonding for us. It’s helped our relationship grow in so many beautiful, sexy ways. He’s super wonderful and adventurous. Being able to explore your sexuality to its fullest in a relationship is pretty dang magical.” —Engle

7. The first time they proudly display your artwork. 

“Once we moved in together, my wife hung up my illustrations around our apartment. She didn’t ask to, she just did it. It was such a big deal to me, more than she realizes.

I grew up poor, on and off food stamps and in small, cramped one-bedroom apartments shared with four family members and millions of cockroaches. When I lived with my abusive ex, that space didn’t really feel mine because of how tumultuous the relationship had been; everything felt more like a shared space and less like a home. I never truly had a space of my own.

When I came home one day and saw that she hung up my artwork, it was the first time I ever felt like I fit in anywhere and was truly loved. Something as simple as hanging up a picture told me, ‘You belong here.’” ― Tevy Khou, illustrator 

8. The first time you meet each other’s friends. 

“Sometimes that little act of meeting each other’s friends is more stressful than meeting each other’s family (especially so in many gay or LGBTQ relationships, where your friends may be your chosen family). That first brunch, that first time out with their group of friends to the karaoke bar — you want to make a good impression, seem relatable, friendly, act engaged, and, of course, you’ve got to make a good impression. Because it’s the friends who just might end up having the biggest impact on what happens in the relationship.” ― Adam Groffman of “Travels of Adam”

9. The first time you collaborate on a project.

“The ‘little’ milestone that comes to mind is when my (now) spouse and I collaborated on our first art project. I can’t remember what it was because we have made a ridiculous amount of art together in the seven years we’ve been a couple, but it was probably a GIF of our cat.

This milestone quickly led us to start an art and animation company together. We call the company YoMeryl as a reference to our first date and the discussion we had that night about how amazing Meryl Streep is and that she could literally be anywhere so it’s best to not shout her name too loudly.” ― Bronwyn Lundberg, artist at YoMeryl

10. The first time they open up to you emotionally. 

“When my partner shared deeper parts of himself, it mattered to me because it meant he was opening up and learning to trust me. As a writer, I’m pretty open about a lot of things, and I’ve learned (and am still learning) that everyone is not able to access their feelings so easily, so I always appreciate the unraveling of layers in relationships.” — Renée Cherez, writer 

11. The first time they say ‘I love you’ to your dog.

“One milestone was when I caught him saying ‘I love you’ to my little Pomeranian, Oscar, for the first time. The two of them tend to have a like/hate relationship because they both battle for my attention and affection, which my dog always wins, so hearing him say he loves Oscar was a huge milestone for us.” ― Ramos 

12. The first time they see you perform on stage. 

“Before I met my wife, some women I dated would say, ‘I thought you would be funnier’ (because I’m a comedian). I didn’t think I was supposed to perform while I’m eating jalapeño sliders at Applebees, but OK.

So when I met my wife, I was happy she never questioned my lack of stage performance when we were on a date. When she finally saw me on a stage, I thought this will either enhance our relationship or could be the beginning of the end. Luckily, she liked my set and is now my biggest fan and harshest critic, and I wouldn’t want it any other way. ― Regan 

Responses have been lightly edited and condensed for clarity. 

Also on HuffPost

Susan Fowler Perfectly Illustrates Why You Shouldn't Silence Women

$
0
0
Susan Fowler dared to speak up and sparked change at Uber.

NEW YORK ― Before Susan Fowler, then 25, took down the CEO of Uber with a blog post exposing the company’s toxic, sexist culture, she’d already overcome some daunting obstacles.

The daughter of an evangelical preacher, she grew up dirt poor in rural Arizona, Fowler writes in a new memoir, “Whistleblower.” She and her six siblings were homeschooled until their mother was forced to go back to work. Fowler then taught herself at night, with a curriculum she designed, while working at less-than-minimum-wage jobs during the day. She landed a full scholarship to Arizona State University and from there elbowed her way into a transfer to the Ivy League. 

Yet there’s one obstacle that she hasn’t been able to get around, Fowler writes. And that’s sexism. Multiple incidents of humiliation, gaslighting and retaliation during her time in college and then at a series of Silicon Valley startups culminated with her “very strange year” at Uber. 

Fowler’s 2017 blog post went viral, leading to the ouster of Uber’s co-founder Travis Kalanick as well as the firing of 20 other people inside the high-profile company. It helped drive the Me Too movement. Now, her book comes at a time when the conversation around sexual harassment seems to have lost some of that drive. 

One sharp example: after years spent criticizing Donald Trump for the way he treats women, Democrats are contemplating nominating Michael Bloomberg, a presidential candidate with a history of sexist remarks and a track record of harassment and discrimination lawsuits against him and his company. The details of those claims are murky because the women who complained ended up signing non-disclosure agreements that bound them to silence.

Fowler’s experiences are a reminder of what happens when a woman is not silenced. She chose to write a blog post, knowing that if she filed suit against Uber, the company would force her into arbitration and her story would never come to light.

And she wanted to go public to help others who had been mistreated, Fowler told a small gathering in New York City on Wednesday night. 

“I knew I had to do it on my own blog because no one else is going to tell my story for me,” said Fowler, who is now the technology op-ed editor at The New York Times.

Her new book goes far beyond the blog post, offering up more details about how Uber treated its workers during Fowler’s time there. 

She exposes the ride-sharing company’s human resources department as a tool for gaslighting workers and enforcing the status quo. According to the memoir, HR representatives at Uber told Fowler on multiple occasions that she was the problem ― not the supervisor who propositioned her or the manager who threatened to fire her for speaking up.

“I felt like I was losing my mind,” she said during her talk on Wednesday.

Fowler showed up to the event, an interview with former Fox News host Gretchen Carlson (another woman who spoke truth to power), wearing a black leather motorcycle jacket. “I wore the jacket for a reason,” she said, recalling one of the more absurd moments of her time at Uber.

Fowler said she and a few other female engineers were told they wouldn’t be receiving the leather jackets that the company was giving its male engineers. Because there were so few women, Uber could only get a bulk discount on the men’s jackets.

“They decided it wouldn’t be fair to the men if the women had more expensive jackets. If we really wanted equality, we should realize that’s what this was,” Fowler said to laughter in the audience.

After Fowler reported the jacket incident to HR, her manager told her that if she ever complained to the department again, she would be fired.

She’d contacted HR before. Each time she did, there was retaliation, Fowler said Wednesday night.

“Have you ever considered that you might be the problem here at Uber?” one HR representative asked her in a meeting to discuss the jackets ― a moment recounted in Fowler’s book. “All the complaints you’ve made to HR have one thing in common, and that thing is you.”

The conversation ended with the rep explaining to Fowler that the reason more white men are engineers is because they are just really good at engineering. (Fowler notes in “Whistleblower” that actually there are more Asian male engineers at the company.)

Despite the reactions from her manager and HR to her complaint about the jackets, Fowler was undeterred.

“While I was sitting in the meeting with him, I was typing a letter to HR,” Fowler told the audience, explaining that she documented every instance of wrongdoing that happened during her time at Uber. 

“I wanted a record,” she said.

A Culture Of Abuse

Working in Silicon Valley was Fowler’s Plan B after she was blocked from graduate school in physics because of blatant sexual discrimination at the University of Pennsylvania, she writes in her memoir. Surely, the tech world wouldn’t be as bad, she thought.

But she was propositioned by her boss on her first day at Uber, Fowler memorably recounted in her 2017 blog post. After she complained to HR, she was told that it was his first offense, that he was a high performer and that they weren’t comfortable disciplining him. Instead, they give her the “opportunity” to transfer to another group at Uber so that this guy wouldn’t give her a bad performance review.

Learning later that it wasn’t the first time he’d done this, she led a group of colleagues to file HR complaints.

Once she transferred to another group, she writes in “Whistleblower,” she got a new male manager. He didn’t try to hook up with her ― but he bullied, yelled and humiliated her.

“How did you get hired?” he asked her. He and other male managers told her repeatedly that she was not a real engineer. She writes that demeaning comments like that were typical at Uber. Employees were made to feel inferior and less-than; they were berated for “mistakes” and driven to work long hours at their bosses’ whims. 

At Uber, women and people of color were humiliated, isolated and driven to depression, Fowler writes. One Black employee, Joseph Thomas, died by suicide. His widow and friends said publicly that job stress played a role.

Fowler portrays Thomas’ death as a turning point for her. She stopped seeing herself and her colleagues as the problem and stopped believing her bosses when they berated her. 

“The problem wasn’t me or any of Uber’s other low-level employees but Uber’s culture ― a culture created and sustained by multiple levels of executives and managers who gradually, cruelly ground employees down until they felt life was no longer worth living. I was determined not to be the next victim.” she writes.

Since Fowler posted her initial allegations three years ago, Uber has made changes, implementing the recommendations from former Attorney General Eric Holder’s internal investigation, strengthening its human resources policies and bringing in a new legal team led by a former Justice Department official. The company has forced out many bad actors in addition to Kalanick. Insiders have told HuffPost that the culture is vastly different. 

Uber’s new CEO, Dara Khosrowshahi, essentially went on a two-year apology tour to help revamp the company’s image, reported New York Times writer Mike Isaac. Recently the company, which has been struggling financially, even came clean about the number of sexual assaults that take place during its customer trips.

“Susan’s courage to speak up was a catalyst for much-needed change at Uber and in countless other organizations around the world,” an Uber spokesperson told HuffPost.

Fowler said Wednesday night that she is still banned from using the service, however.

How Discrimination Destroys Women’s Careers 

In one of the best insights in the book, Fowler dismantles the diversity, inclusion and work-life balance policies that tech companies use to signal their virtue. 

At one point, she learned that her then-supervisor at Uber had been giving women poor performance reviews to stop them from transferring out of his group via promotions. That, in turn, kept up his “diversity numbers.” 

“The issue wasn’t that Uber needed to be more diverse and inclusive,” she writes. “The issue was that Uber had a culture that ignored and violated civil rights and employment laws.”

Fowler wryly points out that copies of Arianna Huffington’s book on the importance of sleep were stacked up all over the Uber offices, even as employees were shuffling around on little sleep. (Huffington served on Uber’s board of directors from 2016 to 2019.)

Perhaps even more disturbing than what happened to Fowler at Uber is what happened after she left the company and came forward with her blog post. In the book, she writes that she was followed in San Francisco by a private investigator Uber had hired. Her friends and family told her they received strange phone calls from people looking to learn more about her. 

“I was followed and stalked by private investigators up until the writing of this book,” she recounts. “Several people warned me that my life was in danger.”

When Fowler eventually asks Khosrowshahi if the company still had investigators following her, he told her “that he ‘killed all that crap,‘” she writes. “Uber’s use of private investigators, he said, was ‘just insane.’ It was ‘unreal what was going on.’”

It’s not always easy to describe how sexual discrimination works. Harassment and discrimination on the job can be harder to identify when they’re not clear-cut assault or Weinstein-level monstrosity.

Fowler, though, is able to perfectly articulate the horror at Uber. Crucially, her book also broadens the view beyond Uber, offering a clear-eyed exploration of what workplace sexual discrimination looks like, why it’s so toxic and how it destroys ambitions, careers and lives.

“[T]he institutions were stronger and more powerful than I was, and they’d always had something I desperately wanted, something they could hold over my head, something they could take away,” she writes, recalling the day she published her blog post. “Until today.”

Trump Complains South Korea’s ‘Parasite’ Won Best Picture Oscar: ‘Was It Good?’

$
0
0

President Donald Trump complained during a rambling rally in Colorado Springs about the South Korean blockbuster “Parasite” winning the Academy Award for Best Picture earlier this month, saying he wished an English-language movie akin to “Gone with the Wind” had won instead.

“How bad were the Academy Awards this year?” Trump asked the crowd on Thursday. “‘And the winner is a movie from South Korea.’ What the hell was that all about?”

“We’ve got enough problems with South Korea with trade,” he continued. “On top of it, they give them the best movie of the year? Was it good? I don’t know.”

The president went on to say that when the Best Picture award went to “Parasite” — a history-making decision in which it became the first non-English-language movie to nab the honor — he thought it was merely for “best foreign film.” (“Parasite” did win the award for International Feature Film as well.)

“I’m looking for like … let’s get ‘Gone with the Wind,’ can we get ‘Gone with the Wind’ back, please?” Trump rambled, naming the 1939 epic that romanticizes slavery. “Sunset Boulevard. So many great movies. The winner from South Korea, I thought it was best foreign film. Best foreign movie. No… did this ever happen before?”

It hadn’t.

Director Bong Joon Ho’s film shattered expectations, nabbing four Oscars and bringing praise to South Korea’s long-overlooked film industry. Bong has been hailed as a hometown hero in Seoul.

Neon, the U.S. distributor of the film, responded to Trump’s comments with a terse statement of its own on Thursday. 

“Understandable,” Neon wrote on Twitter, “he can’t read.”

Trump spent his time in Colorado touting his accomplishments in office, lambasting the recently concluded impeachment inquiry and reflecting on why he hasn’t earned more praise. He said he was disappointed not to have been made Time’s “Person of the Year” (the honor went to Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg), and said he and his supporters deserved the honor in perpetuity.

“When the world revolves around all of us, we should be chosen; there’s nothing wrong with it,” Trump told his supporters. “I mean, we’ve won it, but we should win it every single year.”

Bhim Army Chief Chandrashekhar Azad Permitted To Hold Rally In Front Of RSS Premises In Nagpur

$
0
0
Bhim Army chief Chandrashekhar Azad speak to media during a press conference at the Press Club of India, on February 12, 2020 in New Delhi.

NAGPUR, Maharashtra — The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court on Friday granted permission for a rally of Bhim Army chief Chandrashekhar Azad in front of RSS’s Smruti Mandir in Reshimbagh area of the city to be held on Saturday.

The Bhim Army had earlier secured permission from CP & Berar Education Society, which owns the Reshimbagh ground, after making the stipulated payment but had been denied permission from the local Kotwali police station, under whose jurisdiction this ground comes. Police has claimed Azad’s rally could lead to law and order issues.

One of the objections put forward by the police was the Bhim Army’s anti-RSS stance which, they said, could create law and order problems if the rally was allowed at this location.

For the latest news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

The Bhim Army’s Nagpur unit had moved to the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court against the Kotwali police station.

The Reshimbagh ground is situated right next to the RSS’s Smruti Mandir, which is the administrative headquarter of the RSS and is situated just a kilometre away from its headquarters in Mahal. When in Nagpur, the top officer bearers of the RSS including its chief Mohan Bhagwat and general secretary Bhaiyyaji Joshi are put up at the Smruti Mandir.

All major RSS events in Nagpur including the RSS chief’ Vijayadashmi speech, which is considered the most important speech in the Sangh Parivar, take place on this ground every year. 

While granting permission for the Bhim Army’s event, a division bench of  Justice Sunil Shukre and Madhav Jamdar set the condition that the event shall not be converted into a public demonstration or public protest and shall not be used for any political purpose.

“No inflammatory speeches and no such speeches that would tend to or incite violence or spread hatred amongst citizens or communal ill feelings or which would lower down the dignity and reputation of the citizens and nation or prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India or public order shall be given by anybody taking part in the meeting,” the court observed in its ruling.

On Thursday, the court had reserved the order but both the judges had come down heavily on the police for  “for not relying on any specific inputs” while denying permission for the Bhim Army’s event.

“Mere difference of ideology of any organisation located close by can not be a reason for denial of permission for a rally. Suppression can prove to be adverse and such protests, on the other hand, provide a safety valve,” the Bench had observed

“Not giving permission would mean curtailing fundamental rights and that would not serve the cause of democracy,” the court had said.

Donald Trump Is Finally Visiting India, But Why Now? Experts Tell Us

$
0
0

The friendship between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump has survived a slap on the wrist, outrage over the latter’s mediation offer on Kashmir and a vague rebuke over India’s “very high” tariffs. And now, after turning down earlier invitations, the US President will finally be in India in a couple of days. 

Trump, whose off-the-cuff remarks have sent the Indian government into damage control mode several times (see here and here), has a packed schedule over his two-day visit, ranging from attending an extravagant event at the Motera Stadium in Ahmedabad to potentially fending off raucous monkeys at the Taj Mahal.  

The highlight will undoubtedly be the ‘Namaste Trump’ event — on the lines of ‘Howdy Modi’ at Houston in the US last year — in Ahmedabad, though the government is now facing uncomfortable questions about the mysterious organisation that is apparently paying for it.   

ALSO READ: Here’s Everything Modi Govt Is Brushing Under The Carpet For Donald Trump’s Visit

While his “good friend” Modi is going OTT in the preparations, Trump’s visit begs the question: why now? Why is the US President visiting India during the heat of election campaign there? What does he hope to gain out of this trip? 

After Trump took office in 2017, Modi had invited him to visit India during a telephonic conversation, but that didn’t materialise. 

Trump also turned down India’s invitation to be the chief guest at the Republic Day celebrations in 2019 due to “scheduling issues”. He was again invited by Modi last year to visit India while addressing the ‘Howdy Modi’ event. 

“We want you to come to India with your family, and give us the privilege of welcoming you. Our friendship, and the Indian-American shared dream...we will give it a new future,” Modi said during the event.

HuffPost India spoke to two experts to understand how Trump hopes to benefit from his India trip.

‘Modi and Trump: Two populist leaders who understand each other’

“Modi knows how important the size of crowds and being in a favourable spotlight is to President Trump and so is going out of his way to promise a large crowd in Ahmedabad,” said Rani D. Mullen, Associate Professor at College of William & Mary, Virginia, and a senior visiting fellow at Centre for Policy Research, Delhi. 

“Yet there is also a clear understanding in India that Trump is a president who loves to make deals, particularly in an election year in the United States. This has lent the impending visit a transactional hue, which is a change from the narrower foreign policy prism through which India has historically dealt with the United States.”

The timing of the visit, Mullen said, speaks to Trump’s need to show that he
can deliver deals, particularly with the US election coming up at the end of the year.

Mullen said that this visit is expected to focus on three areas — greater economic cooperation, a recalibration of the US-India relationship, and a reintegration of India at the heart of a strategic rebalance in Asia.

“Under the Trump administration, there has been a greater focus on the US-India bilateral economic relationship than under previous US presidencies and, showmanship aside, economic issues will dominate the visit,” she predicted.

Mullen also pointed out three possible outcomes from this visit:

  • Ideally both sides would like a deal hammered out before the visit, even if it is a small trade deal, like the recently signed Phase 1 U.S.-China trade deal.
  • India has already signalled that it is open to providing greater market access for American dairy and farm ranging from pecan nuts to cranberries, as well as lowering of duties on American Harley-Davidson motorcycles. India’s high tariffs on Harley-Davidsons has been frequently cited by Trump as a barrier to a trade deal and it does not cost India much to compromise on this issue since India does not import many of these bikes, nor does it produce motorbikes of this size.
  • For its part India would like to gain an exemption from steel and aluminium tariffs that the Trump administration has imposed, as well as restoration of India in the preferential trade programme that, until last year, enabled India and other developing countries to export approximately 2,000 products duty-free to the US.

Both sides, Mullen added, would also want to refocus the relationship to the “India-first” South Asia policy which Trump set out at the beginning of his term.

“At a time when the Trump administration is desperate to deliver a key election-year victory in the form of a peace deal with the Taliban, even if it is only a paper peace deal, there is also more recognition of the greater weight of India in its neighbourhood. This includes the importance of India to peace in the South Asia region.”

ALSO READ: Hugs Aside, Donald Trump Is Probably Not Modi’s ‘True Friend’. Here’s Why

India is also one of the key actors in the US’s strategy to counter China’s growing influence. “While India’s importance in American efforts to balance China were downgraded over the past couple of years, there is growing recognition within the Trump administration that India will be key to balancing China in the Indo-Pacific region,” Mullen added.

‘India is a safe bet for Trump’

Sangeeta Mahapatra, a research associate at the Institute of Asian Studies, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), told HuffPost India that “India is a safe bet” for President Trump. 

“He has just been acquitted from impeachment by the Senate. In a visit to India, where a foreign leader like Prime Minister Modi, who also has high approval ratings like Trump (this is something that matters to him when it comes to his political messaging) has gone all out to give him a grand welcome, he can present himself as a superstar global leader to his core voter and woo the Indian-Americans, the richest ethnic diaspora in the U.S., before the November Presidential election.”

It will also give him a chance to show economic, energy, and defence agreements, cementing his claim of the money flowing back home, Mahapatra added. 

Speaking about the timing, Mahapatra said that coming to India earlier wouldn’t have been appropriate for Trump as the countdown to the impeachment process had started.

“The impeachment process is done and dusted for him. Now it is time for re-election and while India did not figure in Trump’s State of the Union speech, it, unlike North Korea (which is a priority for Trump), can give him something concrete to show to his domestic constituency.”

Even if there are no major trade deals, Mahapatra said that the public relations exercise will go a long way in image-boosting, funding, and lobbying before the election.

“The role of the India lobby in America like the Overseas Friends of the BJP, the Indian American Committee for Political Awareness, the Indian American Forum for Political Education, and the U.S.-India Political Action Committee in building up bilateral ties has to be acknowledged here,” she added.

For the latest news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

'Trance' Review: What Critics Said About The Fahadh Faasil-Starrer

$
0
0
Fahadh Faasil and Nazriya in 'Trance'

The highly anticipated Fahadh Faasil-starrer Trance finally hit theatres in Kerala today.

The film has been on a rocky road to its release after run-ins with the Censor board, multiple postponements of its release date in Kerala and disappointed fans over further delay in its release outside the state.  

In Trance, director Anwar Rasheed’s first film since 2013, Fahadh re-unites with actress Nazriya on the big screen for the first time since they got married in 2014.

The cast also includes Soubin Shahir, Chemban Vinod Jose, Vinayakan, Gautham Menon, and Dileesh Pothan.

The film has been shot by cinematographer Amal Neerad, with sound design by Oscar-winner Resul Pookutty.

Here’s how critics have reviewed the film: 

Fahadh delivers a great performance in this psychedelic film, writes Cris for The NewsMinute

“Anwar’s filmmaking keeps you engaged the entire first half during which a captivating story begins to unfold. The last half does not keep up to the first, scenes that you enjoyed earlier becoming stretched, almost like you took a pill yourself and everything seems to take too long. But it doesn’t let you down, with some excellent performances coming from a very promising cast – Fahadh, Chemban Vinod, Dileesh Pothan, Nazriya, Soubin Shahir, Vinayakan, Sreenath Bhasi and, in his first Malayalam performance, Tamil director Gautham Menon.”

Fahadh Faasil is charged up, but the film is a half-hearted mess, writes Aswathy Gopalakrishnan in Silverscreen

“Trance, evidently, cannot quite put its finger on the rights and wrongs of the situation. The faith-healers are greedy and corrupt, but what about the society that lets this business thrive? By creating easy villains out of a corporate company, the film bypasses a larger responsibility to analyse the big picture, of organised religions and the herd culture it propagates.”

A half-baked attempt, despite a sensational Fahadh Faasil, writes The Hindu’s SR Praveen

“Trance might still manage to ruffle quite a lot of feathers across various religious cults among their wide fanbase, but as a serious critique of corporate spirituality and as a piece of cinema, it is a half-baked attempt. Having experienced its potency at half-bake, one can only wonder what they would have achieved with a little more patience and ingenuity.

 

“Trance is definitely a bold attempt for its theme, as far as Malayalam cinema is concerned. But it fails to do justice to the theme it explores with its weak script that becomes so cluttered and confused towards the third act.”

Fahadh and faith star in a vibrant canvas, writes Prem Udayabhanu for Manorama Online

“Vincent Vadakkan’s screenplay is watertight in this alluring first half. There is no flab to be shed and the editor, Praveen Prabhakar, has marvellously played on with the tight script. Trance assumes innumerable twists and turns in the second half. And it is slightly wobbly like Nazriya’s character who makes an appearance after the break. Then there are countless characters unleashed to the screen, much like the mega miracle meetings we know of. Our man, his masters, their acquaintances and the creators slightly lose the plot from then on. So it meanders aimlessly through the grey terrains of faith, psychedelic imageries swanky indoors and what not.”

Fahadh Faasil elevates Anwar Rasheed’s film, writes Goutham VS in The Indian Express

“Anwar Rasheed’s Trance is not everyone’s cup of tea and definitely not an easy watch. The movie is a one-man show featuring ace Malayalam actor Fahadh Faasil. Of course, there are other elements like Amal Neerad’s cinematography, Sushin’s background score, Anwar Rasheed’s visualisation that make Trance a one-of-a-kind Malayalam movie. However, Fahadh steals the limelight by portraying a character that is hysteric and disturbing at the same time.”

For the latest news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.


What Even Is Donald Trump Nagrik Abhinandan Samiti? Twitter Has A Lot Of Questions

$
0
0
A hoarding welcoming U.S. President Donald Trump ahead of his visit to Ahmedabad.

Two days ahead of US President Donald Trump’s visit to India, there’s one big question that everyone is asking, and it is all thanks to India’s foreign ministry: what on earth is the Donald Trump Nagrik Abhinandan Samiti?

Until Thursday, no one had heard of this shadowy committee that is apparently organising the “Namaste Trump” event that the US President is really excited about. And then, in reply to a question about whether opposition leaders would be invited for the event, Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Raveesh Kumar said that this would be up to this mysterious association.

He didn’t give any more details, but this was enough. The Congress immediately swung into action, at least on Twitter, questioning who the officebearers of this organisation were, and why the Gujarat government was paying for a presumably private organisation’s programme. 

Mahesh Langa, who reports for The Hindu from Ahmedabad, tweeted tongue in cheek on Thursday night that the announcement had set off a furore in the city.

The Telegraph reminded its readers that like ‘covfefe’, this may be destined to remain one of the big mysteries of our time. It also pointed out that this samiti is not mentioned on the posters that have been put up all around Ahmedabad.

The media coverage passes for Trump’s event at the Motera stadium have also been issued by the Government of Gujarat and does not mention the samiti. 

Officials involved in the preparations for the ‘Namaste Trump’ event are also unaware of this committee. “I don’t know about the committee. We are only concerned about the preparations and logistical support,” a top official told The Hindu. Another told the newspaper that he only “learnt about existence of the committee today (Thursday)”.

The ‘Namaste Trump’ event is modelled on last year’s ‘Howdy Modi’ extravaganza in the US, which the BJP has claimed was paid for by party volunteers. That event had been hosted by the Texas Indian Forum and Business Standard said the organisers raised $2.4 million in donations, mostly from the Indian diaspora, with help also coming from “two-three corporates”.

Twitter users had many, many questions about this committee. While some asked about the office bearers, others asked why the government was spending over Rs 80 crore on the event. 

While some reports claim the Gujarat government has spent Rs 80-85 crore on Trump’s visit, others say it has cost the state exchequer Rs 120 crore. It is not clear whether these estimates include the cost of the ‘Namaste Trump’ event as well.

There is some good news though—the search in Ahmedabad seems to have finally paid off. The Hindu’s Langa tweeted earlier in the day that the chairperson of the Samiti is none other than Ahmedabad mayor Bijal Patel, a BJP member known to be close to Home Minister Amit Shah. And fear not, it’s not just her—according to Langa, Durgesh Buch, the president of the Gujarat Chamber of Commerce & Industry, is also a member. 

But questions still remain. Why was this samiti unheard of till Raveesh Kumar disclosed the name to reporters? And who is funding the ‘Namaste Trump’ event?

'Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan' Movie Review: A Full-Blown Attack On Patriarchy And Homophobia

$
0
0
A still from Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan

From the onset, Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan makes it clear what it’s about. In the opening scene, Ayushmann Khurrana’s Kartik and his lover Aman (Jitendra Kumar) plot to help a friend (Bhumi Pednekar) elope with her boyfriend. As she jumps out of her balcony, the motorcycle which is supposed to be her vehicle of liberation doesn’t start smoothly, and her father catches the trio. As Kartik gets beaten up and Aman is caught in the commotion, Bhumi kickstarts the bike and escapes into the night. The message is clear: there are no saviours in this film, only rebellious romantics.

Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan is one of the few mainstream Hindi films that wears its gay heart proudly on its rainbow cape, treating sexuality as a cause of celebration, directing the shame and humiliation at those trying to inflict it. The ‘those’ here are a predictable lot: Aman’s family, in whose Allahabad household the drama mostly unspools.

There’s the family patriarch, Shankar Tripathi (Gajraj Rao), the mother who’s never shy of dropping dark zingers (Neena Gupta), Manu Rishi as Tripathi’s bumbling brother and a delightfully hysterical Sunita Rajwar, who plays his wife. Maanvi Gagroo is their ‘neglected daughter’, whose wedding gets called off after the groom learns about Aman’s sexuality. The rest of the film is set against this context: societal diktats in the Northern hinterland are so strong, that a straight marriage has to be called off because a family member is gay.

ALSO READ: A Lesbian Bollywood Buff, I’ve Waited For ‘Ek Ladki Ko Dekha To Aisa Laga’ All My Life!

Now, from Bareilly Ki Barfi to Badhaai Ho, it does feel like we’ve suffered an overdose of the comical North Indian family who communicates exclusively through wisecracks. In Shubh Mangal..., too, we occasionally see a quiet moment of reflection before the tension is released with yet another zinger. In that sense, much of this film depicts quarrelling within the family, and despite our familiarity with the ‘flavour’, the dialogue here is objectively hilarious. In a film that’s also about how patriarchy moulds the roles of women, Neena Gupta and Sunita Rajwar get some of the smartest lines, as they deliver sharp comebacks to the casual remarks of their husbands.

And it’s crucial to note that the humour is always at the expense of those grappling with the ‘taboo’ of same-sex romance while the relationship between Kartik and Aman itself remains quietly dignified, never becoming a target of ridicule, something Bollywood has been notorious for. It’s an important distinction: eliciting laughs from a family’s overdramatic meltdown at something that is - and is shown as - pretty normal and straightforward is different from making the protagonists the source of derision. 

Another aspect that stands out in the film is its subversion of iconic Bollywood characters and moments which have so far existed in a heteronormative context. From DDLJ and Aashiqui to references to Deewar, Sholay and most importantly, to the ultimate vintage symbol of masculinity - Amitabh Bachchan - Shubh Mangal... pulls celebrated Bollywood imagery out of its past and embeds them with a queer narrative. This is a massive leap for Bollywood.

And what isn’t? There are moments towards the end where it appears that the film is going progressively out of hand. A couple of sub-plots don’t quite add up while the repeated emphasis on black cauliflower which Gajraj Rao grows, gets a bit annoying. Maybe the metaphor there is about how cultivating something against nature doesn’t quite work, but it feels a bit OTT. 

Rao, though, is exceptional in the film as is the entire supporting cast, especially Gagroo as Goggle. 

ALSO READ: What the ‘Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan’ Trailer Means To A Gay Man From Small-Town India

Although, in parts, I found the normally dependable Khurrana to be a bit unsure and jumpy, as if he’s not certain how he should anchor this character, the actor is still quite remarkable, powering through the role with a restless energy and a dogged optimism that has come from having endured a difficult past. Without showing him as overtly effeminate, which falls in the caricature territory, Khurrana is shown rocking a nosepin and an occasionally blingy wardrobe, small touches that never overpower but quietly add to our reading of his character.  

It’s Jitendra, though, who’s more endearing here, allowing his vulnerability to take over even in moments of strengths. It’s a difficult role and he makes it look easy.

While it’s admirable that an A-list Bollywood star is challenging archaic notions of masculinity and queering heteronormative stories, Shubh Mangal... leaves us with some difficult questions too.

Should people who’ve been violently oppressed be beholden to their oppressors for simply not oppressing them anymore? And what happens when the violence is being directed by your own parents?

It’s a complex dilemma that warrants a deeper interrogation and perhaps Shubh Mangal Zyada Savdhaan is not that film, for it doesn’t even delve too deeply into the structural oppressions faced by the community. The film exists within the confines of the mainstream template that binds Bollywood, something that also makes it accessible to a huge population. 

For now, this is a commendable beginning, just like Article 15 was, but we must work to reach the stage where our movies go beyond simplistic, fairytale renditions to answer more searching questions as well. And, like Sidhant Kumar Behera wrote in HuffPost India after this movie’s trailer was released, that we will soon have openly gay actors playing important roles as well.

We Have 10 Years Left To Save The World, Says Climate Expert

$
0
0

The next decade will determine what kind of a world we will create. We can do nothing in the face of a climate crisis that is showing its strength through devastating fires, floods and extreme heat, and usher in a dystopian world of choking pollution and huge swaths of unliveable land.

Or we can act. Everyone, from individuals, to companies, to cities, to countries, works to cut their emissions in half by 2030, steering us away from catastrophe and towards a low-carbon, healthier, happier world.

These are the two worlds Christiana Figueres sets out in her new book “The Future We Choose: Surviving the Climate Crisis,” written with her former senior adviser Tom Rivett-Carnac.  

Figueres has every reason to feel despair. As the lead U.N. negotiator for the landmark Paris climate summit in 2015, she pulled off the seemingly impossible. She wrangled with 196 nations to produce a historic climate agreement, with countries agreeing to genuine commitments to slash emissions. 

Christiana Figueres at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Jan. 20, 2020. 

Fast forward to 2020 and the world is a different place. President Donald Trump will pull the U.S. out of the Paris agreement if he gets a second term, the Madrid climate summit in December ended in failure and watered down promises, and most global leaders are refusing to step up to the urgency of the climate crisis. 

Yet Figueres remains stubbornly positive. Here she talks to HuffPost about the dire situation we are in, and why she has written an ode to optimism in the face of an existential crisis.

The interview has been edited for length and clarity. 

You say this is the most important decade in the history of humanity. What’s at stake? 

What’s at stake over the next decade is nothing less than the future of the planet and of humanity on the planet. That’s no exaggeration, that is no hyperbole. That is actually scientific fact. 

It is in this decade that we will either reach a concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere that is so dangerous that we will not be able to manage the negative consequences for years to come and the increasingly destructive forces of nature will wreak havoc upon, not just infrastructure and biodiversity, but also on the ability of humans to live on this planet.

Or, the other choice is that we wake up to the fact that during these 10 years we can decisively change the course of those greenhouse gases, we can bring them down to one half of what they are now, and along that journey, we can actually do a lot of good.  

A protest against climate change, in Parliament Square, London, on Feb. 14, 2020.

We can increase public health, we can increase the quality of urban life, we can increase the comfort and smartness of transportation. And actually, I also think that we can rise as a human species; we can rise to a higher level of consciousness and a higher level of understanding of who we are on this planet. 

So it’s a pretty simple choice if you ask me, we just have to make the choice!

In the book you set out a vision of the future in 2050 if we do nothing ― it is a bleak scene of air thick with pollution, contaminated water, searing temperatures. It’s a really scary picture. What role do you think fear plays in climate action?

I put fear into a broad family of sentiments: fear, grief, despair, hopelessness, helplessness. All those sentiments that we usually think of as being negative sentiments, I actually think that they’re very helpful, because what they do is they raise the alarm, they raise the flag that something is wrong. They wake us up and force us to come out of our comfort zone.  

The question then is, where do we go from there? If we wake up from that comfort zone and push ourselves on to a meaningful path toward constructing a different world, then we have done the right thing by future generations.

A firefighter sprays water while battling the spread of the Maria Fire as it moved quickly towards Santa Paula, California, on Nov. 1, 2019. 

If we realize that we’re in grief, despair and helplessness, and we consciously choose to stay there and we give up, and we say actually this is too much, this is overwhelming and we’re not up to it ― then that will become our reality, it will be a self-fulfilling prophecy.

We stand at the most crucial crossroads, not only in the evolution of the planet, but in the future human experience on this planet, and we need to make a conscious wakeful choice. Because if we don’t, we will be dragged by business-as-usual forces that take us to the first absolutely horrible world.

At its heart, this book is about optimism and you write in the book “optimism is not soft it is gritty.” What did you mean by this? 

Optimism has actually become a very controversial term within the climate field. So it’s important to understand what we mean by optimism. 

We don’t mean naive ignorance of what the consequences are. We also don’t mean an irresponsible sense that things are going to work out and we don’t have to do anything.

What we mean by optimism is, firstly, a conscious choice to acknowledge, understand and educate ourselves about what the reality is out there and the consequences that we may be facing. 

It is difficult. Anything that is new and different and unknown is always difficult. So we have to be gritty.

The second part is to make a mindful decision that we are going to change the course of where we’re currently going. It is like we’ve been going down a highway at full speed and all of a sudden we have an exit sign, and we have to decide, are we going to exit or we just going to go down the highway?

We call it a “stubborn” or “gritty” optimism because we have to understand that taking this exit and constructing a completely different trajectory is not going to be easy. It is difficult. Anything that is new and different and unknown is always difficult. So we have to be gritty; we have to be determined; we have to be very focused on what we want to attain and how we’re going to attain it. 

There’s absolutely no space for giving up. We have to construct a different future. But the good news is that we can and we have 10 years, and it is amazing what we can do in 10 years if we make the decision now and start right away.

The book talks a lot about individual actions to tackle climate change. Some people balk at putting an emphasis on individual action because they say it ignores companies’ and governments’ responsibility. What is your take on that? 

Well, the fact is that these don’t operate in completely unlinked universes. They feed on each other.

I cannot tell you how many CEOs tell me that they are preparing for a low-carbon future for two very clear reasons. They’re recognizing consumer demand [for low-carbon products] is increasing, certainly in industrialized countries, but also in developing countries. And secondly, they want to be able to access young brains and young brains do not want to work for companies that are irresponsible.  

The same thing can be said for governments, and the ultimate individual power that we all have, in democracies at least, is voting. When we begin to see that there is a critical mass of people for whom climate change responsibility is a voting issue, governments begin to act accordingly. 

The United States is a very interesting case. Four years ago, there was barely any mention about climate change, even among the Democratic candidates. Today, four years later, every single aspirant to be the Democratic nominee has a solid, climate change platform. Why? Because they know that voters in the United States are beginning to get more and more concerned, and they know that they have to be responsible in order to get those votes. 

What individuals do trickles up both to corporations, as well as to government. 

Often individual actions that make a difference ― quitting flying, quitting meat, not owning a car ― are framed as actions that will lead to a reduced quality of life. What would you say to that?

I would say that is completely wrong. There is much more quality of life to be had from a low carbon economy. 

Let’s start with cities. Cities that turn their transport systems, their infrastructure, their built environment, their living spaces to low carbon are actually much more livable because they’re less congested, they’re less polluted, they have more greenery ― all leading to much better breathing conditions. They will be cities that are more energy self-sufficient, more water self-sufficient. It’s just a much much better quality of life.

Flowers bloom on the green roof at the World Wildlife Fund building in Washington D.C. 

A world that goes beyond two degrees [warming], to three or four degrees, is a world of increasing health challenges: whether it is pollution that causes asthma, causes all kinds of respiratory diseases, causes a diminishment in IQ because brains can’t develop. Or if it is the rampant increase in dengue and malaria and other diseases that will spread due to warming temperatures. 

[If we don’t tackle climate change] we will have hugely escalating health costs. If we avoid all of that, we will have health savings that we can then invest into smarter energy, more green in cities, better food ― we will be able to support the funding of many measures that address climate change.

So, it is not true that a low carbon society is a poor quality society, it is exactly the opposite. 

The book talks about the need for a redefinition of our relationship with each other and the world around us, moving away from individualism. How can we achieve this fundamental mind shift over a short period of time? 

It is simply a choice, an active choice of starting with small things in our daily lives and being much more mindful of the impact, and making a decision to have a smaller impact on what you buy and how much you buy.

Oh my goodness. Do we really need everything that we buy? When is enough, enough? Do we really need the fourth or fifth or sixth pair of shoes? Or the fourth or fifth or sixth sweater?  

We are already getting out of single-use plastics in many countries. That’s a really good start. But we should move away from single-use anything: single-use fashion, single-use appliances, single-use furniture. We should get out of that single-use mentality and understand that a sharing economy, a circular economy, is the only way to go. 

And we reach that conclusion as soon as we are much more mindful about our carbon footprint and how we walk upon this earth. 

What would be the biggest things you would suggest that we as individuals could do to start tackling that carbon footprint?

Figure out what your carbon footprint is per year, then start to identify what you can do today, tomorrow and the next day to begin to lower that carbon footprint.

Food is a very clear one. If you’re still eating red meat every single day, you do yourselves a favor, you do your body and your health a favor, by starting to diminish red meat. Choose one day where you don’t need red meat, and then a second day, a third day. You can also start to be much more mindful about the foods that you eat, which, in as much as they’re seasonal and local, have a lower carbon footprint. 

In your home you can be much more conscious about energy consumption. We don’t tend to think about energy, which is amazing because we do track our finances, and we know where our salary goes and what we spend it on. We should also know what we spend on energy.  

Solar panels on the roof of a house in Rockville, Maryland. 

Be mindful of the fact that you don’t necessarily have to have all the lights on in every single room in the house when you’re not in that room. Be mindful of the fact that you can insulate your home much better so that in the winter, you can heat your home more efficiently.

You can also choose what quality of energy you use. Move toward more renewable energy, whether you use it from the grid or whether you put solar panels on your roof. 

Then of course transport is a big issue. Are we being conscious about the way we transport ourselves, whether by land or by air? There are just so many things that we can do to just cut down on unnecessary transport. And if it is necessary, then share that transport mode, so that the emissions are also shared. 

President Trump is trying to withdraw from the Paris agreement, the Madrid climate summit ended in failure, and governments around the world are failing to act. In this context, what is it that gives you the most optimism?

I would actually point to two things. The first is the fact that just a few days ago, we had confirmation that global greenhouse gases, contrary to all expectations that they were going to be increasing in 2019, were flat. And that is very good news. 

It doesn’t mean that with that flattening out of emissions that we’ve actually done our job. One year does not a trajectory make, so the question to be answered over the next few years is: Have we started to de-link economic growth from growth in carbon emissions? Because that is what we need to do.

And the second cause for optimism is the fact that financial markets seem to finally have understood that investments in high carbon assets are just hugely risky, and that there is less risk and more reward in shifting capital over to low carbon assets. 

You have the asset owner Alliance, which is a group of the largest institutional investors in the world, totaling more than $2 trillion, which has already come out and said we understand that in order to protect the value of our assets we have to move over to a net zero carbon portfolio by 2050

You also have the letter from Larry Fink, who heads up the largest asset management company in the world, BlackRock, which manages $7 trillion. He says he has understood that high carbon is highly risky. BlackRock will no longer be investing in coal, they will be shifting their investments, and they’re asking all other asset managers to do so.

Finally, what do you want people to take away from this book?

The conclusion that climate change is real, and it is affecting us already, we have 10 years to address it, and I personally can contribute to the solution.

The Future We Choose: Surviving the Climate Crisis by Christiana Figueres and Tom Rivett-Carnac will be published on February 25, 2020 and can be preordered here.

For more content and to be part of the “This New World” community, follow our Facebook page.

HuffPost’s “This New World” series is funded by Partners for a New Economy and the Kendeda Fund. All content is editorially independent, with no influence or input from the foundations. If you have an idea or tip for the editorial series, send an email to thisnewworld@huffpost.com.

 

Phoebe Waller-Bridge Lifts The Lid On Her Work On New James Bond Film, No Time To Die

$
0
0

Phoebe Waller-Bridge has spoken about her “really challenging” work on the upcoming James Bond film, No Time To Die.

The Fleabag and Killing Eve creator served as a co-writer on the latest 007 outing, which will be the last to star Daniel Craig in the lead role.

“It was really challenging, and my role there was to try and be helpful and to offer things,” she recalled during an appearance on Radio 4’s Woman’s Hour.

Revealing a script had already been written when she signed on to the project, Phoebe continued: “Cary [Joji Fukunaga, the film’s director] had a really specific vision for the movie and so did Daniel, and it had been in development for a really long time and they had a script, so that process for me was about stepping back and just saying, ‘I’m going to give you these options and then you can use any of them or you can get rid of all of them’, because everybody was writing on it.

“I mean, there were just so many ideas and (it was) so clear to so many people. I was just throwing things out there and hoping that anything sticks. I was going ‘pew, pew, pew!’”

Phoebe Waller-Bridge at the SAG Awards last month

Describing her highlight of the experience, Phoebe added: “It was actually seeing the stunt people, the stunt guys practising… Practising? Drilling? I don’t know.

“And they would actually hold their hands like guns, like kids, when they’re rehearsing it. I was walking past, and then they all go ‘pew, pew, pew’ for the gun sound! That was my favourite take away from being on a Bond set.” 

Back in December, Phoebe spoke out to clarify reports about why she’d been recruited to help write No Time To Die, after several outlets suggested she’d been brought in to make the film’s women more well-rounded. 

No Time To Die marks Daniel Craig's fifth and final time playing James Bond

“That didn’t really come into the conversation,” she insisted. “That’s only really the press that have made that thing, in terms of me being a woman, you can see it is a button-pressing thing.

“The reality was I got a call from Barbara [Broccoli, the film’s producer] and Daniel [Craig] saying, ‘We like your work, can you come in and help us?’.

“There wasn’t ever really a conversation about can you come in and help us with ‘the ladies’.”

No Time To Die hits UK cinemas on 2 April, with Rami Malek and Lashana Lynch joining returning Bond stars including Ben Whishaw and Naomie Harris.

Mum Shares Heartbreaking Video Of 9-Year-Old Son Traumatised By Bullying: ‘If I Don't Stand Up And Speak Out For Him, Who Will?’

$
0
0

* CONTENT WARNING * 

Nine-year-old Quaden faced bullying everyday at school.

Queensland mum Yarraka Bayles has been flooded with support after live-streaming a heartbreaking video of her nine-year-old son’s despair after being bullied over his short stature.  

Bayles, an advocate for Indigenous issues and disability awareness, told NITV that she went to pick her son up from Brisbane’s Carina State School on Wednesday and witnessed another student picking on Quaden because of his height.   

Quaden was born with achondroplasia, a common form of dwarfism. 

After returning to the car, a fed-up Bayles started to film her son’s anguish in hopes of urging parents to take action against the nonstop bullying her son endures.  

“I’ve just picked my son up from school, witnessed a bullying episode, rang the principal, and I want people to know – parents, educators, teachers – this is the effect that bullying has,” Bayles said in the Facebook Live video. 

“All it takes is for one more instant. You wonder why kids are killing themselves.” 

Bayles explained in the video that the taunting and teasing of her son is constant and he often has thoughts of taking his life. 

In tears, Quaden said in the video: “I just want to die right now.

“Give me a knife I want to kill myself.” 

As of Friday afternoon, the Facebook Live was viewed 25 million times. 

“A lot of my favourite celebrities are messaging me on Instagram, my favourite rappers,” Quaden told NITV in an exclusive interview. 

US comedian Brad Williams, who describes himself as a “Part time dwarf” on Twitter has launched a GoFundMe Page to raise funds for Quaden and his mum to visit Disneyland. 

The page had raised nearly $400k on Friday, Brad has reached out to Ellen Degeneres for help managing the campaign. 

“The love you have shown is unbelievable. Thank you! Money donated will not be wasted! We have a team of people making sure everything is completely legitimate,” Williams said on Friday. 

“We thank you for your generosity and patience while we make sure all this is done the right way.”

Prominent community members, including sports stars and actor Hugh Jackman, have pledged their support to Quaden online.  

“That is one of the saddest things I’ve ever seen,” Aboriginal artist Allan Mckenzie said before donating a print of his famous “Because of Her We Can” to Quaden’s mum.   

“I want you and your family Quaden to know we stand with you, brother we support you in your journey, brother.”  

“Quaden’s mother shared publicly a video of him begging for a rope to take his own life due to bullying. The thing about blackfellas is, you bully one of us,you bully all of us. We stand with you Quaden and we need you here, on earth,” shared activist Nessa Turnbull-Roberts

AFL legend Leigh Matthews called for a long-term plan to stop discrimination of short-statured people. 

“This is the impact on a nine-year-old kid that just wants to go to school, get an education and have fun,” Bayles explained in the video. 

“But every single freaking day, something happens. Another episode, another bullying, another taunt, another name-calling.”

Bayles told NITV there has also been criticism of the video, but she was prepared for that.  

“I have copped a lot of backlash for it, I thought twice about deleting it but I wanted people to see the effect bullying is having on my child,” she told the publication. 

“If I don’t stand up and speak out for him, who will?”

Bayles added that disability awareness needs to be raised within schools and the discrimination needs to be addressed in order to save lives. 

“Nobody knows the battles we face in private. I usually share all the positive highlights, but this stuff needs to be addressed to save our babies’ lives.”

NITV reports Quaden has since been removed from the school and will likely be home-schooled.

Bayles told the publication she does not blame any specific child, although she is urging the school to take more action to educate students and parents about the effects of bullying.  

The family thanked people from around the world for the support during a media conference on Friday: 

 

If you or someone you know needs help:

Kids Helpline on 1800 551 800

Lifeline on 13 11 14

Beyond Blue on 1300 22 46 36

Headspace on 1800 650 890

Outside of Australia, please visit the International Association for Suicide Prevention for a database of resources.

What Does The ‘Defend Julian Assange’ Campaign Say About The Labour Leadership?

$
0
0

You’re reading The Waugh Zone, our daily politics briefing. Sign up now to get it by email in the evening.

Dreyfus doofus?

John McDonnell has crafted an image over the past few years as a sweater-wearing bank manager, chuckling at and charming interviewers who suggested he was a dangerous revolutionary. While Jeremy Corbyn was Magic Grandpa, McDonnell was Uncle John.

But as the pair of them prepare for political retirement from the front bench (though Corbyn hinted he may stay on), it’s clear that on the issue of Julian Assange, they are both keen to champion the kind of backbench causes they have plugged away at for decades.

Today, McDonnell - who don’t forget is the shadow chancellor - decided that the most important issue for him was not the looming Budget but the fate of the Australian Wikileaks founder who is facing extradition to the US on a string of espionage and other charges over his leaks of classified material.‌

After a two-hour visit with Assange in Belmarsh prison, McDonnell emerged to make the extraordinary claim that this was “the Dreyfus case of our age, the way in which a person is being persecuted for political reasons for simply exposing the truth of what went on in relation to recent wars”.

Given Labour’s controversies over anti-Semitism, that sounded singularly tin-eared to the Jewish community and the CST charity (that provide on-street security for Jews in the UK) was quick to tweet it was “Disgraceful false equivalence to one of the key learning moments of modern Jewish history”.‌

But McDonnell is not alone among the current Labour leadership. Corbyn himself raised Assange’s case in PMQs only recently, telling Boris Johnson that “this extradition should be opposed” because Assange had exposed “war crimes, including the murder of civilians and large-scale corruption”.

Now, not everyone in the shadow cabinet is a fan of Assange and many women Labour MPs still revile his name because of the way he avoided justice in Sweden over alleged rape and assault in 2010. In fact, I vividly remember after a WaughZone Live event with Emily Thornberry last autumn one pro-Assange campaigner asking the shadow foreign secretary for support. Her response was a very firm message that she felt the priority was getting him extradited to Sweden. In fact, Thornberry has long said of the women involved “they deserve justice”.‌

But justice never came. Assange avoided extradition by seeking refuge in the Ecuadorean embassy, and last year prosecutors in Sweden dropped the case. Deputy Director of Public Prosecution Eva-Marie Persson said at the time that “I would like to emphasise that the injured party has submitted a credible and reliable version of events. Her statements have been coherent, extensive and detailed.”

Persson added “the reason for this decision is that the evidence has weakened considerably due to the long period of time that has elapsed since the events in question”. Assange’s decision to simply avoid court had paid off, but it left a nasty taste in the mouth of many.

McDonnell today said he discussed with Assange a startling claim made by his lawyer this week that Trump’s allies had offered to pardon him if he said Russia was not behind Wikileaks leaks of Hilary Clinton emails. During a visit to London in August 2017, congressman Dana Rohrabacher is said to have told Assange that “on instructions from the president he was offering a pardon or some other way out if Mr Assange...said Russia had nothing to do with the DNC [Democratic National Committee] leaks”.

A huge problem for Assange here is that there’s plenty of evidence of his close links to Vladmir Putin and the Russian regime, and that the DNC leaks were part of a Russian state-sponsored hack. One of his closest associates was also Israel Shamir, a pro-Putin anti-Semite. Your average voter may ask: is this the kind of company that McDonnell and Corbyn want to keep?

Now, of course it’s possible to oppose Assange’s extradition on grounds of press freedom and protection of whistleblowers, while at the same time loathing him for the way he avoided justice on the rape claims and for his long-standing associations with Russia. But given the way Corbyn’s own response to the Salisbury poisonings was effectively weaponised by the Tories in the last election, there are political costs for Labour in backing Assange.‌

Which brings us finally to Keir Starmer. When he was Director of Public Prosecutions, the Crown Prosecution Service fought hard for justice for Assange’s victims. When Assange claimed in 2012 that the Swedes were considering dropping the case, one email (leaked naturally) showed a CPS lawyer writing to their Swedish counterpart ‘don’t you get cold feet!’

But although Starmer has long fought hard as a lawyer for various causes, he is also a staunch believer in judicial independence. Leading politicians actually opposing an extradition is very problematic in the UK because our system is now a matter for the courts not politicians. Several Labour MPs were shocked when Corbyn actually opposed extradition in that PMQs.

Theresa May was the last home secretary to have the power to interfere in extradition, blocking Asperger’s sufferer Gary McKinnon’s removal to the US for hacking charges. But she changed the rules so that in future no successor would have such power, and it is now the courts rather than the home secretary who consider any human rights representations.

That fact alone, even without Assange’s track record on those rape allegations and his close links to Putin, will probably be enough for Starmer to avoid joining any ‘stop the extradition’ protests in Parliament Square. And there will be plenty of Labour MPs, both women and men, who breathe a sigh of relief.

Quote Of The Day

“Happy to serve the party in any capacity”

Jeremy Corbyn refuses to rule out staying in the shadow cabine

Thursday Cheat Sheet

Tony Blair used a speech to mark the 120th anniversary of the founding of the Labour party to warn that against “a situation where you’re getting rounds of applause from your activists and the public’s out there thinking ‘oh my god, what’s this’.” He added that’s “absolutely the risk of the Democrats in the US now”.

Home secretary Priti Patel faced allegations she tried to oust her permanent secretary Sir Philip Rutnam and created an “atmosphere of fear” and bullying at the Home Office, the Times revealed.

Robert Halfon led Tory MPs in vowing to oppose any plans to end the fuel duty freeze in the Budget, following reports that No10 adviser Dominic Cummings had suggested a hike next year to align with the UK’s climate change credentials.

Google is planning to move its British users’ accounts out of the control of European Union privacy regulators, placing them under U.S. jurisdiction instead after Brexit, Reuters reported.

Rebecca Long-Bailey vowed to make it Labour policy to scrap the anti-extremism programme Prevent. The plan goes significantly further than the 2019 Labour manifesto, which stated the party wanted to review the programme.

What I’m Reading

How Will Jeff Bezos Spend His £10bn On Tackling Climate Change? - Atlantic

Got A Tip?

Send tips, stories, quotes, pics, plugs or gossip to waugh.zone@huffpost.com. 

Subscribe To Commons People

Each week, the HuffPost UK Politics team unpack the biggest stories from Westminster and beyond. Search for Commons People wherever you listen to podcasts and subscribe. 

Touching Chinese Restaurant Campaign After Coronavirus Outbreak Gains Momentum In Australia

$
0
0

In the wake of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, a social media campaign encouraging Australians to support local Chinese businesses is gaining momentum.

The hashtag #IWillEatWithYou urges people to dine at Chinese restaurants, after several eateries have claimed a slump in business following racism and xenophobia towards Asian-Australian communities. 

Community action organisation GetUp! introduced the hashtag over the weekend, asking its supporters: “Can you pledge #IWillEatWithYou & eat at an Asian restaurant to show your support?”

“While other restaurants and public spaces are still buzzing, it is the Chinatown restaurants and Asian grocers that stand empty. Panic around the virus is unfairly impacting Chinese and Asian communities,” the organisation stated on its website

“If we don’t take action – people will lose their jobs, and their livelihoods. Can you take the pledge to defeat baseless fears and support these businesses in their time of need?”

Australians have begun to show their support, tweeting photos or messages along with the hashtag.

On Sunday Melbourne woman Susie Cole shared a photo of her family eating at a local Chinese restaurant. She also referred to the city’s once-popular Shark Fin restaurant in Little Bourke Street, which recently closed following the coronavirus outbreak. 

“Last week our family (Mum, Josie, Mason & granddaughters Poppy & Daniella & me) ate at Harmony(Chinese) restaurant & had no qualms about coronavirus or anything else, but this week, iconic Shark Fin restaurant in Little Bourke St has closed after nearly 40 years & countless other family run Chinese restaurants are in peril because people are avoiding them for baseless fears,” she wrote.

“Please keep patronising the Chinese restaurants you love, please visit fire affected rural communities & spend money there, small businesses need customers to survive. #IWillEatWithYou.”

Last week Gabriel Chan, the owner of Melbourne’s Chinatown restaurant Shark Fin, said he was closing the doors to the 30-year-old eatery after business had suffered. 

’’It’s very hard... With customer fears of coronavirus still high, ‘‘we can see numbers reducing’,” he told The Age

“We’re very sad, very unhappy, but we still have to work, so I would tell the people don’t scare, come to the restaurant, support us.”

Mr Chan also owns sister restaurant, Shark Fin Inn. He said he made the decision to close one of his businesses down in order for the other to survive. 

The restaurateur told the publication that customer numbers had dropped by 80 per cent, while more than 40 staff, plus 10 casuals had been let go. 

This photo taken on February 14, 2020 shows staff clearing a table at a Chinese restaurant in Melbourne's Chinatown.

Fearmongering And Misinformation 

Many people have expressed concern over some of Australia’s media coverage in relation to the coronavirus crisis, as well as coronavirus fearmongering on social media encouraging people to avoid certain suburbs or Chinese cuisine. 

 

One recent viral message doing the rounds on messaging platform WhatsApp made false claims that there had been three confirmed cases of the virus, which originated in Wuhan, China, in the Sydney suburbs of Eastwood, Rhodes and Burwood.

Fiona Martin, MP and Federal Member for Reid which includes Burwood, told HuffPost Australia: “There has been a number of social media posts and messages spreading misinformation about the Novel coronavirus.

“As Reid has a large Chinese-Australian community, they have been particularly vulnerable to hoax information causing undue fear or concern. I am encouraging all residents in my area to seek information and advice about the virus from official sources such as the NSW Government Health website and the Australian Government Department of Health website.”

NSW Health also advised that these social media posts were unauthorised, with a spokesperson saying: “NSW Health has been made aware of social media posts being widely circulated warning people to not consume certain foods or visit certain locations in Sydney.

“These posts have not originated from NSW Health nor any entity relating to us.” 

It appears the hoax messages mentioned suburbs with a significant population of people with Chinese ancestry. Most recent census data states that 38.4% of Eastwood’s population is Chinese ancestry, along with 44.5% of Rhodes’ population and 45.1% of Burwood’s population.

 

Australia has 15 confirmed cases of coronavirus (COVID-19), five in Queensland, four in NSW, four in Victoria and two in South Australia.  

 

I’m Sikh, Bisexual And A Dad – And Still Figuring Out What It Means To Be All Three

$
0
0
Getty Images

Growing up, I don’t think I even really knew what bisexuality was. 

I knew I wasn’t gay – I was attracted to both men and women – but not having any LGBT role models that looked like me prevented me from seeing who I could really be.

I knew I wanted children and a stable family too, but that just wasn’t seen as possible for a same sex couple in those days. Instead, there was never any doubt I would have an arranged marriage, have children, and live the future expected of me. At just 21, my family introduced me to a potential wife and, even though we had only met twice, we agreed to marry. 

Once we did there was an immediate expectation that we would have children, but we knew we weren’t ready. We wanted to get to know each other, get our careers off the ground and buy our own home before we had children. 

We did just that, and then had two beautiful daughters, two years apart. But life as parents felt different. Our dissimilarities became more and more apparent and we seemed to drift apart. Our marriage ended when my youngest daughter was just two.

Seeing a counsellor to help me deal with the breakup of my marriage, I experienced the turning point of my life.

Seeing a counsellor to help me deal with the breakup of my marriage, I experienced the turning point of my life. For the first time, I said the words: “I am gay”. After years of ignoring my attraction to men and shutting it away deep inside, I had admitted to someone that I was gay. Her response? Simply: “That’s okay”.

Understanding and accepting myself as a gay man, I now faced the challenge of reconciling my identity as a Sikh man who is gay – and as a gay man who is the father to two children. I didn’t know any Sikhs who were gay, and I was not convinced these two aspects of my identity were compatible – until I researched the Sikh view on homosexuality and learned (to my surprise) there was nothing forbidding or condemning LGBT people. Indeed, there was plenty of evidence of equality for all regardless of their faith, colour, race, sexuality, sex or any other personal characteristic. 

Now more secure in my identity as a gay Sikh man, I then had to reconcile what it meant to be be a gay dad. Again, there was little information to be found – until I found a Facebook group for gay dads, where hundreds of men shared the experiences and challenges they faced, and took inspiration from positive gay dad role models. Getting involved in this community, I was able to learn from other dads’ experiences of coming out to others, particularly ex-wives and children.

I now identify as a bisexual man, which presents its own challenges. Bisexual people are themselves marginalised by not just wider society but by some gay and lesbian people too; we’re told we’re not fully accepting of our sexuality as a gay person, or we’re not ‘trustworthy’ partners

Although I had reconciled these parts of my identity, I kept thinking about why it was so hard for me to find anyone to look up to

Being a visibly Sikh man with a turban and a beard had led to much prejudice in itself, but being a member of the LGBT community means I’ve faced far more discrimination and racism than I would in mainstream society. Coming out’ to potential partners as a dad to gay/bi men can also make dating difficult, and being a bisexual man within the Sikh community means I face yet more prejudice and homophobia.

Although I had reconciled these parts of my identity, I kept thinking about why it was so hard for me to find anyone to look up to. So I signed up as a volunteer for a charity called Diversity Role Models, who facilitate LGBT awareness workshops in schools for young people, teachers and parents. 

I decided I wanted to be a visible Sikh LGBT role model – both because within the Sikh community most LGBT people are unable to come out, but equally because I want it to be seen by the wider community that it’s possible to be religious and be LGBT. I want to inspire young people to be comfortable about who they are, so they can stride forward in life with confidence. By my last count, I have reached 1,369 young people and 71 staff and governors through working with DRM, and I feel incredibly proud. 

I’m extremely proud, too, to call my own children my biggest allies. They join me for Pride in London every year and tell me they are proud to have a bisexual dad. Despite this, there is still a lot of work to do to eradicate prejudice for people, let alone people like me: LGBT people who are ethnic minorities, LGBT people who have a visible faith identity, LGBT parents. If I can make a positive difference to even just one person’s life, then I can feel a sense of achievement.

Deep Singh is a father, HR professional and facilitator for Diversity Role Models, writing under a pseudonym. He contributes to the Rainbow Dads podcast.

Have a compelling personal story you want to tell? Find out what we’re looking for here, and pitch us on ukpersonal@huffpost.com 

5 Films/TV Shows To Watch On Netflix, Amazon, Hotstar This Weekend

$
0
0
A still from Taj Mahal 1989

With streaming platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Hotstar competing for our attention, it can be quite overwhelming to browse all of them to pick the perfect show for your weekend bingeing. To make matters easier, here’s our selection of shows that you can binge on this weekend. 

Taj Mahal 1989 - Netflix

 

One of the more underrated gems on Netflix - the streamer doesn’t appear to have marketed this the way it does some of its other shows - Taj Mahal 1989 is a consistently engaging drama that crisscrosses between multiple strands of narrative.

From campus politics to domestic disquiet, the show paints a vivid, complex portrait of the aspirations and ambitions of small-town India, stripping it off romance or fake flavour, and depicting fully-realised characters. It also has a terrific performance by Neeraj Kabi and Sheeba Chaddha. 

Yeh Ballet - Netflix

 

Sooni Taraporevala is a director we need to see more of. In 2009, she made a charming little indie called Little Zizou and now she’s back with Netflix’s Yeh Ballet, produced by Sidharth Roy Kapur. The film charts the journey of two boys from Mumbai chawls who dream of making it big in the world of ballet. 

Exceptionally performed and firmly rooted in its milieu, Yeh Ballet is a delight and makes for the perfect weekend viewing.

Zindagi In Short - Flipkart Originals

 

As rival Prime Video continues to grow, Flipkart too has joined the streaming boom. The e-tailer launched its first original - Zindagi In Short - an anthology of seven short films by a collective of fresh directors - Gautam Govind Sharma, Tahira Kashyap Khurrana, Punarvasu Naik, Vinay Chhawal, Vijayeta Kumar, Samrutika Panigrahi and Rakesh Sain.

Produced by Guneet Monga’s Sikhya Entertainment, the shorts have an interesting mix of stories, with Thappad being the most effective of them all and Chhaju ke Dahi Bhalle making a quietly profound political point.

Hunters - Amazon Prime Video

 

If you want to scale up your weekend and dive into some violent, dark, revisionist drama, Hunters might just be the show for you. Produced by Jordan Peele (Us, Get Out),

The sell is simple: a mysterious concentration-camp survivor leads a group of everyday folks to hunt down Nazis. If that doesn’t convince you, the fact that it has Al Pacino making his TV series debut should do the job.

Wake ‘n’ Bake - Amazon Prime Video

 

If you haven’t yet seen Rohan Joshi’s new stand-up special, maybe now is the time. The comedian is in fine form in this special, where he speaks about his experiences of navigating his mid-30s in a satirical, self-aware and occasionally cocky way. Most of the jokes land and while some set-ups seem contrived, there’s a certain earnestness in Joshi’s style of storytelling, which is delightful to watch. The part where Joshi speaks about his privilege is a sharp primer on any straight, upper caste, man still grappling to understand the concept.

With 3,000 Tonne Gold Deposits Found In UP's Sonbhadra, India Has 2nd Largest Gold Reserves

$
0
0
Gold reserves found worth 3,000 tonnes in Sonbhadra district of Uttar Pradesh is almost five times India's current reserve of the yellow metal

The Geological Survey of India (GSI) has discovered gold deposits to the tune of around 3,000 tonnes in Sonbhadra district of Uttar Pradesh, almost five times India’s current reserve of the yellow metal, officials said on Friday.

For the latest news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.


The gold deposits were found in Son Pahadi and Hardi areas here, district mining officer K K Rai said.

Work on finding gold reserves in Sonbhadra was started almost two decades back in 1992-93 by the Geological Survey of India, he said, adding that auctioning of these blocks through e-tendering would start soon.

The deposits in Son Pahadi is estimated to be around 2,943.26 tonnes, while that at Hardi block is around 646.16 kilogram, the official said.

Besides gold, some other minerals have also been found in the area, Rai added.

As per the World Gold Council, India currently has 626 tonnes of gold reserves. The new reserves are almost five times that amount and estimated to be worth nearly Rs 12 lakh crore.

The British reportedly were the first to initiate the process of finding gold reserves in Sonbhadra region, which is more in news for being a Naxalism-hit area.

Interestingly, Sonbhadra - the second largest district of Uttar Pradesh - is the only district in the country which shares borders with four states ― Madhya Pradesh to the west, Chhattishgarh to the south, Jharkhand to the south-east and Bihar to the east.

16 Lakh People Joined AAP From Across Country Since Delhi Polls: Gopal Rai

$
0
0
Supporters of Aam Aadmi (Common Man) Party (AAP) take part in the celebrations outside the AAP office in New Delhi February 10, 2015. The upstart anti-establishment party crushed India's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party in an election for the Delhi assembly on Tuesday, smashing an aura of invincibility built around Prime Minister Narendra Modi since he swept to power last year. REUTERS/Adnan Abidi (INDIA - Tags: POLITICS ELECTIONS)

A total of 16 lakh people have joined the Aam Aadmi Party since Delhi polls through its “nation-building” initiative launched to expand the party’s reach across the country, senior AAP leader Gopal Rai said on Saturday.

For the latest news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.


Right after the election, the AAP launched a campaign on February 11 under which it set up a phone number 9871010101. By giving a missed call on this number people can join AAP’s campaign.

Rai said 16 lakh people, including 1,72,269 in Delhi and 1,81,212 in UP, have joined the AAP using the phone number. The party will launch a mega campaign in 20 states from Sunday.

“The Aam Aadmi Party will pursue the ‘politics of work’ across the country. For this, from February 23, the party will start a campaign to join nation-building campaign in 20 states. As part of this campaign, posters will be put up in 20 states and the missed call number 9871010101 will be displayed on the poster,” Rai told reporters.

“Posters are being prepared in different languages for different states, so that people can be easily reached through local languages, he said.

Rai said in addition, volunteers’ meet will also be organised in all states.

“All our office bearers will hold press conferences in their respective states to spread the model of positive nationalism and development which has come up in Delhi, as the politics of work got a place in Delhi,” he said.

He also said coordinators have been appointed for different states for this campaign.

State coordinators include Lok Sabha MP Bhagwant Mann from Punjab and AAP member Elvis Gomes from Goa.

The AAP registered a landslide victory in the high-stakes Delhi Assembly polls, leaving the main rival BJP way behind and decimating the Congress in a bitterly-fought contest. Since then the party has again started building a national ambition.

The AAP is, at present, recognised by the Election Commission as a state party.

No Discovery Of Gold Deposits Estimated To Be Around 3,000 Tonnes in Sonbhadra: GSI

$
0
0
Gold reserves found worth 3,000 tonnes in Sonbhadra district of Uttar Pradesh is almost five times India's current reserve of the yellow metal

The Geological Survey of India (GSI) on Saturday said there has been no discovery of gold deposits estimated to be around 3,000 tonnes in Sonbhadra district of Uttar Pradesh, as claimed by a district mining official. 

For the latest news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

“Such data was not given by anybody from GSI.... GSI has not estimated such kind of vast resource of gold deposits in Sonbhadra district,” GSI Director General (DG) M Sridhar told PTI in Kolkata this evening.

“We share our findings regarding any resources of ore after conducting survey with the state units.... We (GSI, Northern Region) had carried out work in that region in 1998-99 and 1999-2000. The report was shared with UP DGM for information and further necessary action,” he said.

The exploration works of the GSI for gold was not satisfactory and the results were not encouraging to come up with major resources for gold in Sonbhadra district, he added.

Sonbhadra district mining officer K K Rai had said on Friday that the gold deposits were found in Son Pahadi and Hardi areas of the district.

The deposits in Son Pahadi are estimated to be around 2,943.26 tonnes, while that at Hardi block are around 646.16 kilogram, the official said.

Rejecting the claim, Sridhar said that in its report after exploration in the district “the GSI has estimated a probable category resource of 52,806.25 tonnes of ore with 3.03 grams per tonne gold (average grade) for a strike length of 170m in Sub- Block-H, Son Pahadi of Sonbhadra district of Uttar Pradesh”.

“The mineralised zone having an average grade of 3.03 grams per tonne of gold is tentative in nature and the total gold which can be extracted from the total resource of 52,806.25 tonnes of ore is approximately 160 kg and not 3,350 tonnes as mentioned in the media,” the DG clarified.

The GSI is headquartered in Kolkata.

Viewing all 46147 articles
Browse latest View live